Originally Posted by BanglaRoad:
“But he didn't do that.
Oh the next caller who thinks that he can't talk about Christianity at work has phoned in to complain about blasphemy in movies.”
If you're referring to that part of GS's post that says JOB "could have pointed out the error" of what a caller is saying more courteously, then yes, you're right:: JOB didn't do that. He could've, but chose not to.
If you're referring to that part of GS's post that refers to JOB "sounding like a school bully" as a result of choosing not to use courtesy to point out the error of the caller, then no, you're wrong. GS didn't say JOB
was a schoolbully, but that he
sounded like one.
As for NF, the caller who initiated the £5 petition was reasonable in his response. He said that the petition simply asked that the BoE consider and source out non-animal based alternatives to use when printing out any new money notes in future. Every other caller after that
and NF then engaged in farcical point-scoring. And yes, I say farcical because if we are going to say that some of the reasons offered by callers as evidence of Christian censorship justify JOB's scorn, then some of the reasons offered by callers as evidence of religious, vegan and vegetarian violations justify NF's scorn.
None of these reasons are evidences to stop any of these callers from
being and
living their lives as Sikhs, Christian, Vegans or Vegetarians - i.e. you don't cease being/living as a Christian (or prevented from being/living as one) because of a bit of shiny tinsle or a change in name from Christmas to Winterland (besides, if we are to make a point of it: Easter should be the more important festival for Christians than this Dec period that has slowly become a commerical monstrosity over the decades); you don't cease being/living (or prevented from being/living) as a Vegan because of a bit of animal fat (which probably makes up 0.000001% of
all ingredients and chemicals in the new £5 note) in a bit of paper you have to handle.
The day Christians in this country begin to suffer as those did in the 1st century church (literally hunted down, rounded up, imprisoned, tortured, and killed for their faith) or in countries that
forbid its practice on point of death, then I'll say we Christians are being prosecuted. Then again, I also don't read Peter, Paul and all the other apostles making a big song and dance over their prosecution in Rome: rather, as per the Sermon of the Mount, Christ called it a blessing for far deeper spiritual reasons that some so-called Christians seem to have difficulty grasping/understanding.