• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: US
World Wrestling Entertainment Discussion 41 (Spoilers)
<<
<
23 of 362
>>
>
James Frederick
01-03-2016
That was it.

Glad they explaned how Undertaker or Shane will be the heel.
pembo2004
01-03-2016
Originally Posted by Hollie_Louise:
“I waited 2 hours for that? TWO HOURS”

its laughable
calderyon
01-03-2016
That should have been the end of RAW really.
HaloJoe
01-03-2016
Vince sold that choke better than any 'sports entertainer' than his!
AlexiR
01-03-2016
WWE really need to flesh this whole Shane McMahon angle out.

Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“That was it.

Glad they explaned how Undertaker or Shane will be the heel.”

Casting Undertaker as the guy who just destroys/fights anyone that's put in front of him and it not being personal for him is about the best route they can go (even if I'm not sure it totally rings true). It still leaves the same basic problem as to who the audience is supposed to root for obviously but it at least means WWE aren't asking them to root against Taker. I think the sales pitch for the match itself is watch Undertaker throw Shane around Hell in a Cell/Shane will do some crazy bumps. As mentioned above they just need a much stronger and more focused McMahon story to sell the stakes for Shane.
calderyon
01-03-2016
I donīt like the Usos anymore.
AlexiR
01-03-2016
Originally Posted by calderyon:
“That should have been the end of RAW really.”

You mean not followed up by the Usos?

Uso crazy!
AlexiR
01-03-2016
Originally Posted by calderyon:
“I donīt like the Usos anymore.”

I'm a touch concerned by the use of the word anymore here
calderyon
01-03-2016
Iīd rather watch Roman Reigns wrestle than Usos tbh.
pembo2004
01-03-2016
i am wondering if wwe even care about buyrates anymore??
AlexiR
01-03-2016
Well that felt like a waste of everyone's time.
AlexiR
01-03-2016
Originally Posted by pembo2004:
“i am wondering if wwe even care about buyrates anymore??”

They don't. The months they spent calling people who still buy PPVs idiots wasn't a big enough clue?
AlexiR
01-03-2016
Kevin Owens vs. Big Show?

I'm done. Really don't understand what WWE is thinking
James Frederick
01-03-2016
What is this Goldust R Truth thing supposed to even be ?

Will they end up tagging or will one turn heel on the other it really makes no sense at all.
calderyon
01-03-2016
Originally Posted by AlexiR:
“I'm a touch concerned by the use of the word anymore here”

"Anymore" is used very loosely on this instance. I grew tired of them some time before they won their second tag team titles.
calderyon
01-03-2016
Owens vs Big Show.

Same match than last week. With the similar finish, just the opposite winner.

Owens has his WM opponent sorted there.
James Frederick
01-03-2016
Lana really has annoyed Vince and Co wouldn't think at one time she was one of the most over people on the roster and WWE was all for it one flash of a engagement ring and it's all over.
calderyon
01-03-2016
I guess the Rusev segment is going to close the show then.
James Frederick
01-03-2016
Lana did have a point Brie is a bit to so skinny she looks like she will snap in half when a move is done on her
James Frederick
01-03-2016
Why did Sasha fall back like that?
calderyon
01-03-2016
Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“Why did Sasha fall back like that?”

Because Beckyīs legs slowly "falling" on top of her had the same amount of power as the slam from the 2nd rope she made.

Apparently.
calderyon
01-03-2016
That "Chicken Ma Draz" commercial was more entertaining than RAW tonight.
calderyon
01-03-2016
Ambrose got off pretty lightly.
pembo2004
01-03-2016
pity the best part of raw was the last 5 minutes or so
James Frederick
01-03-2016
Not a bad ending I think they have got the Crazy gimmick down much better now.
<<
<
23 of 362
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map