Originally Posted by hazydayz:
“If you are a pure wrestling fan, you will love WWE because it is full of wrestling matches but if you are a fan of old school wrestling, basically the way wrestling was for many many years, well over 3 decades then you will be used to big men, larger than life men and they all had their own way of doing things. People miss that kind of wrestling. They miss people that are larger than life. People take offence to me talking about wrestlers now looking like regular people and they think i say that as an insult, that's the way wrestling always was, it's always been full of big characters, people that if you didn't know who they were and had never watched wrestling, to look at them you would know they were somebody, they had presence.
I think WWE lacks that. Or they might dress it up and say "star power", the WWE lacks "star power" so we need to push these young guys and make them stars. That there is wrong. What they really mean by "star power" isn't making someone a star, it's what they WISH would happen. You can't just make someone a star, you can't give someone that gift. And dare I say it, guys like John Cena and Randy Orton were some of the last bunch from that old school way of working, that came up that way and if you compare them now, they are larger than life, they LOOK like stars, they look like they belong on TV.
I still think that's why people watch wrestling on TV. They want to see the big stars. They want to see things happen, they're not gonna sit there for 3 hours every week while nothing happens.”
Maybe I'm a bit old school, but imo it all comes down to the throw it away booking and lack of characterization and how they handle it rather than preferences of physique and/or charisma. The issues range from throwing away potentially interesting matches several times a month or even a week without any build. To the match content throwing away some devastating looking moves several times within 3 - 10 minutes. Throw into that many characters on the roster being barely defined.
It's the world we live in. TV shows and movies in particular are often more quick fire than before. WWE is trying to keep up with the times, but it doesn't help at getting people over as important factors. Especially when guys like HHH, Lesnar, 'Taker, Orton etc are lurking in the background, appearing on the video game covers, working more psychology based matches, never wrestling each other on 'free' television, being booked better, not being made to look weak etc.
Take these 10 guys from the roster: Zayn, Owens, Harper, Rusev, Big E, Cesaro, Kalisto, Crews, Ryback, Neville and Stardust. They all have strengths and weaknesses, but have upsides and all have a varying appearance to each other. But they've either been barely defined or faced and jobbed to each other many times already or will have done before the end of the year. It's like there's a growing midcard mafia, who are often exposed when a silly segment pops up, The Shield guys and Wyatt, and then the valuable veterans.
The WWE template is this: midcarder or upper midcarder face off - one of then jobs clean or is pinned after some sort of distraction. They have a rematch - the other guy guy wins. Then there's the rubber match. A DQ or count out usually means the match a rematch is set, again. It's all logical to the scripted sport, but again doesn't help anybody get over as important and isn't doing enough to hold ratings up. There is also the Monday Night Wars holdover, in which every potentially important match (Orton vs. Owens, Zayn vs. Styles) is dispensed of and the upper mid-carders face off several times during the year. Rollins/Ambrose and Wyatt/Ambrose is akin to the number of times Foley/HHH and Rock/HHH were booked. Unfortunately the latter had the benefit of more creative twists and turns.