|
||||||||
World Wrestling Entertainment Discussion 41 (Spoilers) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1001 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
|
Had a lovely few hours watching the Shane McMahon collection on the network. Just about to watch his match with Angle at KOTR 01.
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#1002 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,618
|
Quote:
Had a lovely few hours watching the Shane McMahon collection on the network. Just about to watch his match with Angle at KOTR 01.
|
|
|
|
|
#1003 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Manchester
Posts: 3,178
|
Quote:
It's an odd way to build a Mania feud to say the least where the two superstars involved are absent for 2 months of it. Not saying it can't be built that way but makes it rather clunky Shane appears one week then is off TV while Taker comes back the following week. Shane then comes back while Taker goes again. Lesnar has buggered off while Ambrose is to busy promoting a match at Roadblock...yet Lesnar appears at pointless house shows. Then you have Reigns off TV with a 'injury' yet appearing at the same time promoting WM32. Been a shitty way to build up the 3 main feuds so far. |
|
|
|
|
#1004 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 14,316
|
Quote:
You have 3 big matches this year with Taker/Shane, Lesnar/Ambrose and Reigns/Triple H. Yet with just 3 Raw's left how many Raw's have we had the two wrestlers in those matches to promote it?
Shane appears one week then is off TV while Taker comes back the following week. Shane then comes back while Taker goes again. Lesnar has buggered off while Ambrose is to busy promoting a match at Roadblock...yet Lesnar appears at pointless house shows. Then you have Reigns off TV with a 'injury' yet appearing at the same time promoting WM32. Been a shitty way to build up the 3 main feuds so far. Or do they not count if they're not TV appearances? I'd say on the Shane/Taker match at least it is being promoted weekly whereas it would be easy to forget the other two matches are even taking place. |
|
|
|
|
#1005 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,618
|
Quote:
The Lesnar house show appearances I don't get. From my understanding he has a limited number of appearances yet they seem to be having him on a fair few house shows which would all probably sell well anyway.
Or do they not count if they're not TV appearances? I'd say on the Shane/Taker match at least it is being promoted weekly whereas it would be easy to forget the other two matches are even taking place. |
|
|
|
|
#1006 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Manchester
Posts: 3,178
|
Quote:
The Lesnar house show appearances I don't get. From my understanding he has a limited number of appearances yet they seem to be having him on a fair few house shows which would all probably sell well anyway.
Or do they not count if they're not TV appearances? So why not let him wrestle every now again on Raw? Also would love them to stop the Suplex City stuff now, it is 12 months old soon and watching the Harper match last night it was a complete carbon copy of all the over house show matches. Some offensive from the other guy but then 5 suplexes and a F5. |
|
|
|
|
#1007 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,371
|
Quote:
its only on at 8pm if its live from the UK or Europe
|
|
|
|
|
#1008 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,618
|
Quote:
Not sure but what I really get pissed at is that Lesnar has not wrestled on Raw in what over 10 years. Yet he has wrestled on how many house shows this year? He has fought (off the top of my head) Rusev, Del Rio, Harper and Sheamus all within the last 12 months.
So why not let him wrestle every now again on Raw? Also would love them to stop the Suplex City stuff now, it is 12 months old soon and watching the Harper match last night it was a complete carbon copy of all the over house show matches. Some offensive from the other guy but then 5 suplexes and a F5. |
|
|
|
|
#1009 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 14,316
|
Quote:
Are we looking at another WM29 BFG?
It needs some good booking - which isn't impossible. But it'll be better than Mania 29. For one thing it doesn't have Swagger v Del Rio as a sodding World Title match! |
|
|
|
|
#1010 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,618
|
Quote:
Haha. Nope. The actual wrestling when we get to the night itself should be good enough but can't see it reaching the heights of Mania 30 or 31.
It needs some good booking - which isn't impossible. But it'll be better than Mania 29. For one thing it doesn't have Swagger v Del Rio as a sodding World Title match! And there's been worse Wrestlemanias than 29 too. Pretty sure WM11 which had Lawrence Taylor in the main event wasn't a great one. Lol |
|
|
|
|
#1011 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Manchester
Posts: 3,178
|
Quote:
Problem here is that Suplex City is over with the fans. Brock's suplex city shirt with the name of the town on the shirt sells good numbers (apparently) and the crowd really get into Brock's suplexes, so don't think its going anywhere soon.
Before people jump on me about taking about movez lol I just would like to see more offence from Lesnar that is all |
|
|
|
|
#1012 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 14,316
|
Quote:
Haha. It nearly had Braun Strowman in a main event match though.
And there's been worse Wrestlemanias than 29 too. Pretty sure WM11 which had Lawrence Taylor in the main event wasn't a great one. Lol That's true on Strowman. But then we were told he was a ring general and would be doing Shootinf Star Presses and all sorts so it's our loss I guess. ![]() Worst PPV of modern times? Obviously December to Dismember but I think if you remove Ziggler/Harper there's a strong case for TLC 2014. Awful gimmick matches,terrible match-ups and any matches that had potential were booked into oblivion. |
|
|
|
|
#1013 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,618
|
Quote:
Oh Mania 29 certainly isn't the worst ever agreed. But it was lifeless. And that World Title isn't one of the best - it even had a jobber entrance.
That's true on Strowman. But then we were told he was a ring general and would be doing Shootinf Star Presses and all sorts so it's our loss I guess. ![]() Worst PPV of modern times? Obviously December to Dismember but I think if you remove Ziggler/Harper there's a strong case for TLC 2014. Awful gimmick matches,terrible match-ups and any matches that had potential were booked into oblivion. There's certainly a couple from 2003-4 that should be submitted if that's modern era. But D2D was awful. One match announced before the show and he rest was just put together at the last minute. And Kelly Kely and Ariel had a match (apparently). |
|
|
|
|
#1014 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 14,316
|
Quote:
What counts as modern times?
There's certainly a couple from 2003-4 that should be submitted if that's modern era. But D2D was awful. One match announced before the show and he rest was just put together at the last minute. And Kelly Kely and Ariel had a match (apparently). The timing of that PPV didn't help - 2 bigger PPVs either side from memory. Apparently Shane's original idea for the new ECW was for it to basically be what NXT is now. |
|
|
|
|
#1015 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,166
|
What is the start time for this show tonight anyone? Assuming its two hours considering there are only 5 matches on the card, though I assume we may get a midcard match too. Zayn vs Miz maybe.
|
|
|
|
|
#1016 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,929
|
The problem with this year's WM is it will end on a flat note if it's Reigns cleanly pinning Triple H to win the world title. Everything is set up nicely regardless of who wins the other matches:
Jericho has been on great form after turning heel. They'll both probably be in a ladder match with Zayn, Miz, Ziggler, Owens and Neville. The talent there should make one hell of a match. Lesnar should bring the best out in Ambrose. McMahon/Taker will be a crazy Attitude Era throwback, complete with guest appearances. Likely the best women's match in WM, maybe WWE non NXT PPV, history. A big New Day entrance and toilet break second divas match to round up the show... A double turn in the main event would rival the last two in giving a memorable ending. Can't see it happening though. |
|
|
|
|
#1017 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,618
|
Quote:
However long you want modern times to be. Maybe 2000 as a cut-off point. Not sure why.
The timing of that PPV didn't help - 2 bigger PPVs either side from memory. Apparently Shane's original idea for the new ECW was for it to basically be what NXT is now. Also Badd Blood 2003, for the not really exciting HHH v Nash main event and the fact that Austin and Bischoff had a redneck triathlon all the way through the show. |
|
|
|
|
#1018 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 10,618
|
Quote:
What is the start time for this show tonight anyone? Assuming its two hours considering there are only 5 matches on the card, though I assume we may get a midcard match too. Zayn vs Miz maybe.
|
|
|
|
|
#1019 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,166
|
Quote:
1am UK time.
Also, just found the new best promo in the business: https://twitter.com/zunguzungu/statu...02811156918272 |
|
|
|
|
#1020 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,636
|
Quote:
But Vince isn't actually saying anything is he? Dave Meltzer is saying that Vince is saying. The title of the article is "Vince McMahon doesn't see NXT as a money brand". I probably should have read the whole thinge but when I saw it's another Meltzer says Vince says he hates NXT article, I tend not to bother because it's just Meltzer pandering to what people want to believe anyway.
For what its worth, watching NXT I don't believe there is all that many money guys. You have a couple but I can't personally see the future main eventers to a level that a main eventer should be with the exception of a couple. |
|
|
|
|
#1021 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
|
Quote:
Before commenting? Yeah you probably should've.
|
|
|
|
|
#1022 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
|
Loving the Joe vs Zayn match from NXT
|
|
|
|
|
#1023 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,166
|
Quote:
But Vince isn't actually saying anything is he? Dave Meltzer is saying that Vince is saying. The title of the article is "Vince McMahon doesn't see NXT as a money brand". I probably should have read the whole thinge but when I saw it's another Meltzer says Vince says he hates NXT article, I tend not to bother because it's just Meltzer pandering to what people want to believe anyway.
For what its worth, watching NXT I don't believe there is all that many money guys. You have a couple but I can't personally see the future main eventers to a level that a main eventer should be with the exception of a couple. |
|
|
|
|
#1024 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,401
|
Quote:
Loving the Joe vs Zayn match from NXT
![]() Zayn is great and could put on an amazing Iron Man match with somebody else in their prime but Joe just doesn't have that stamina any more. Unbreakable 2005: Joe vs. Styles vs. Daniels https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U28pyOAMXcI One of the greatest matches of all-time. This is the real Samoa Joe. |
|
|
|
|
#1025 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,401
|
Quote:
Well yeah but over the years I got fed up with 1am or 2am starts, just wish it was on earlier at a suitable timeslot.
The Network is 24/7. You can watch Roadblock any time you want. Why is its start time relevant unless you're staying up to post about it live on here? And if you're the sort of person who does that, it's start time is probably irrelevant as you're obviously a huge fan... |
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:35.





