Oh dear, City not operating this play football from the back malarkey too well
Football Neutrals Thread - Part 2
370 of 441
That moment you trade Redmond out of your FF for Walcott because sky said Redmond was "doubtful" 
Also that moment you have Stones in your team and he has a perfectly good goal disallowed.
Also that moment you have Stones in your team and he has a perfectly good goal disallowed.
If that was disallowed for offside it was an iffy decision................someone was offside by a few inches but it wasn't Stones and these days with the convoluted offside rules I thought they'd get away with that.....
City are a mess at the minute. They looked imperious at the start of the season and now they look totally belaboured. Did one poor result really dent their confidence that badly or has Brendan just figured them out? Odd.
Originally Posted by swingaleg:
“If that was disallowed for offside it was an iffy decision................someone was offside by a few inches but it wasn't Stones and these days with the convoluted offside rules I thought they'd get away with that.....”
“If that was disallowed for offside it was an iffy decision................someone was offside by a few inches but it wasn't Stones and these days with the convoluted offside rules I thought they'd get away with that.....”
It was Aguero - and he was judged to have interfered with play by jumping for the free kick.
That's almost been the theme for the weekend with the goal that West Ham scored yesterday.
Originally Posted by Jamesp84:
“Sky were so busy jizzing themselves over the goal that they didn't know it had been disallowed.”
“Sky were so busy jizzing themselves over the goal that they didn't know it had been disallowed.”
You appear to infer a Sky Man City love-in? They've highlighted their flaws too to be fair. At the end of the day, Sky will seize on anything that generates a story, positively or negatively.
Originally Posted by TheSloth:
“You appear to infer a Sky Man City love-in? They've highlighted their flaws too to be fair. At the end of the day, Sky will seize on anything that generates a story, positively or negatively.”
“You appear to infer a Sky Man City love-in? They've highlighted their flaws too to be fair. At the end of the day, Sky will seize on anything that generates a story, positively or negatively.”
Sorry. By 'Sky', I meant Niall Quinn.
Originally Posted by batdude_uk1:
“City will go on and win this now.”
“City will go on and win this now.”
They're playing quicker as confidence returns following the equaliser - still have a mistake in them so who knows. They should win though although I hope they drop points. Wouldn't rule out a red card for either side either which could change things.
Originally Posted by Jokanovic:
“Stones is all over the place defensively.”
“Stones is all over the place defensively.”
Did you have this post saved from last season?
I'm not sure City deserve to win this one to be honest.
A massive game coming up next, especially if City do end up dropping 2 points today. It'll be very tight-up-top!
A massive game coming up next, especially if City do end up dropping 2 points today. It'll be very tight-up-top!
City from 10 wins in a row to 0 wins in the last 5.
Not looking too good for Guardiola especially if this slump continues.
Sterling and De Bruyne seem to have lost some of that magic.
Not looking too good for Guardiola especially if this slump continues.
Sterling and De Bruyne seem to have lost some of that magic.
A draw I will take that, thank you very much.
Now onto the main event of the day, where we have to win, to close the gap to the sides above us.
Now onto the main event of the day, where we have to win, to close the gap to the sides above us.
370 of 441
