Originally Posted by codeblue:
“You dont pay 50 million for a player who could develop into a world class defender (a world record fee) , you want the real deal.
Now they have very much the player not good enough for the Everton team, who looks lost at city and is making error after error. He even does this for England too with his calamity nature.
He is going backwards, the media give him all the plaudits, charitable forum members such as yourself argue he still has potential, but ignore his errors. Rather than progressing he has got worse. A liability.”
I don't disagree with you that 50 million was a stupidly over-inflated price for him. But that wasn't John's fault was it? Perhaps his 'real' value is closer to 15 million, but that doesn't mean he's an awful footballer does it? That's all I'm trying to say really.... let's stop blaming the player for the fact that other people may have misjudged his abilities.
Originally Posted by pete137:
“Agreed. People kid themselves with the "potential" line.”
Sometimes it's a gamble that pays off. Rio Ferdinand is a good example.
Originally Posted by TheSloth:
“Stones is a good footballer but ultimately a 22 year old defender. He'll make poor decisions as did the likes of Adams and Ferdinand at his age. Given his price tag and the club who paid it, every mistake will be highlighted. He's been told to play from the back so will take more risks. Decision-making is only honed through experience.”
Exactly my thoughts too.