Originally Posted by Grim Fandango:
“I hope so, I have this slightly irrational dislike of him. I know Fellaini gets a lot of stick and he's held up as representing how poor we currently are, but for me Memphis is the better representation of our struggles. I'd be delighted to be proven wrong but I think he's likely to be another dud that we've splashed millions on.”
“I hope so, I have this slightly irrational dislike of him. I know Fellaini gets a lot of stick and he's held up as representing how poor we currently are, but for me Memphis is the better representation of our struggles. I'd be delighted to be proven wrong but I think he's likely to be another dud that we've splashed millions on.”
For me i think the difference is that Memphis has demonstrated a possible potential there which as a club/manager we dont seem to be trying to realise. Fellaini, for me at least, has demonstrated nothing but being an average midfielder for both Everton and United. The rare good game doesnt remove the 90% of other very average ones he has. When was the last time Fellaini was remembered for having a good, noticeable impact on a game rather than being a awkward bloke with an inevitable booking?



