Originally Posted by batdude_uk1:
“The main difference between the ones that you mentioned (Owen, Rooney, Sterling and Ali), they even at a young age were starters for their respective club sides when there was a push to include them in the senior side, Rashford due to having Ibra in his way, is not quite yet a regular starter for us.
So whilst there might be a push to give the younger players a chance, surely it makes sense if those young players are starting games, rather than just being a sub?”
Uh...okay...I'm not talking about those players, though, or making any comparisons or...well...anything. No need to focus on the use of those names in my post because it means nothing.
I didn't think I had to explain my post, but whatever.
Quote:
“with the cliché "if he's good enough, he's old enough" being muttered, and comparisons to other young strikers like Rooney and Owen.”
This means people will refer to the fact that Owen and Rooney started when they were young, when saying that Rashford should also be starting for England.
Quote:
“Then he fails to win England the World Cup and he's just another overhyped player. It's happening now with Dele Alli. In fact you only need to look at Raheem Sterling, he's still only 21 (22 in December).”
This means that Alli and Sterling were once the young players that should be given a chance, and are now being given the criticism for not being world beaters. Alli is only just starting to get it now, when before the Euros there were calls to give him a chance because of the season he had.
It's only three games into the season, it's too soon to be saying he's not a starter or whatever. When fixtures start piling up and the Europa League starts he'll be played. He became a starter last season, and can fight for his place again this season, with less pressure to succeed due to Zlatan being there.