No, we are not on the same page, because you included them two as part of your strike force back in June, and I didn't, because I knew they wouldn't feature, or at a push they'd make the odd cup appearance.
Fletcher was sold, so obviously not good enough. If Wilson wasn't injured he still wouldn't have featured. They are totally irrelevant, and totally irrelevant to what I'm saying now. Injured or not, sold or not, they wouldn't have made a difference.
The reason you needed another striker was argued in the summer, because Zlatan was an aging striker who wasn't proven in this league, and Rashford had to prove he was good enough. Wilson and Fletcher being unavailable means NOTHING in any context. The reason you needed to invest in a striker are the same now as they were in the summer, but since Wilson and Fletcher were fit and available you didn't seem to think it was needed.
I didn't need hindsight to make my point. I didn't have the benefit of hindsight back in the summer when you thought a strike force of Zlatan, Rashford, Wilson and Fletcher was good enough to challenge for the league and compete in the Europa League. When I said Martial would be classed as a wide player, and Rooney wouldn't play up front, and so you only had two recognised first team strikers in Zlatan and Rashford. I don't know why you keep mentioning Wilson and Fletcher when they were irrelevant then and they are even more irrelevant now.