Originally Posted by Eddie hunter:
“You dont go from deciding the team needs a £60m playmaker and one of the best strikers in the world to getting rid of them and replacing them with youth. Its totally contradictory.
One philosophy (I now hate that word) would have seen us replace Di Maria and Falcao like for like and the other wouldn't have signed them in the first place.
If we had the attacking threat of a Di Maria type and a Falcao type the entire squad would have a completely different look IMO. We'd probably still be playing shite football under Van Gaal but there would be an added attacking quality even accidentally.”
“You dont go from deciding the team needs a £60m playmaker and one of the best strikers in the world to getting rid of them and replacing them with youth. Its totally contradictory.
One philosophy (I now hate that word) would have seen us replace Di Maria and Falcao like for like and the other wouldn't have signed them in the first place.
If we had the attacking threat of a Di Maria type and a Falcao type the entire squad would have a completely different look IMO. We'd probably still be playing shite football under Van Gaal but there would be an added attacking quality even accidentally.”
Yep, was a tongue in cheek comment about youth thing as I know its a subject that you and other(s) like to debate!
Only he and the board know why he jettisoned two top class, albeit not delivering, experienced attacking players and didnt replace them



