• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • Entertainment
  • Football
Man United Supporters Thread (Part 50)
<<
<
68 of 388
>>
>
Nova21
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by Eddie hunter:
“You dont go from deciding the team needs a £60m playmaker and one of the best strikers in the world to getting rid of them and replacing them with youth. Its totally contradictory.

One philosophy (I now hate that word) would have seen us replace Di Maria and Falcao like for like and the other wouldn't have signed them in the first place.

If we had the attacking threat of a Di Maria type and a Falcao type the entire squad would have a completely different look IMO. We'd probably still be playing shite football under Van Gaal but there would be an added attacking quality even accidentally.”

Yep, was a tongue in cheek comment about youth thing as I know its a subject that you and other(s) like to debate!

Only he and the board know why he jettisoned two top class, albeit not delivering, experienced attacking players and didnt replace them
NorthernNinny
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by RevengeofthMojo:
“I've unfortunately given up on Jones having any consistency with us and I can never get excited at any of his "comebacks" because he will be out again within 5 games. He needs to go imo.

I notice Borthwick-Jackson is in the side too. I'd be happy to see him back in the first team.”

Hopefully not one of those given a debut never to be seen again.

He looked decent.
batdude_uk1
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by Eddie hunter:
“You dont go from deciding the team needs a £60m playmaker and one of the best strikers in the world to getting rid of them and replacing them with youth. Its totally contradictory.

One philosophy (I now hate that word) would have seen us replace Di Maria and Falcao like for like and the other wouldn't have signed them in the first place.

If we had the attacking threat of a Di Maria type and a Falcao type the entire squad would have a completely different look IMO. We'd probably still be playing shite football under Van Gaal but there would be an added attacking quality even accidentally.”

So now you would like us to sign another striker, even though you have said previously that there would be no point as we only play with one up front, so it would be pointless in signing anyone else!

Make up your mind!

In the case you are talking about, maybe LvG thought he would be fine with the amount of strikers at his disposal?
He would have been very wring on that, but that might have been part of the reason for not replacing Falcao or Hernandez/RvP.
TheMunch
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by Eddie hunter:
“You dont go from deciding the team needs a £60m playmaker and one of the best strikers in the world to getting rid of them and replacing them with youth. Its totally contradictory.

One philosophy (I now hate that word) would have seen us replace Di Maria and Falcao like for like and the other wouldn't have signed them in the first place.

If we had the attacking threat of a Di Maria type and a Falcao type the entire squad would have a completely different look IMO. We'd probably still be playing shite football under Van Gaal but there would be an added attacking quality even accidentally.”

The young players would benefit from having a player of Falcao's former quality, they learn from that. Takes pressure off themselves and they have someone to look up to and learn from.
batdude_uk1
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by NorthernNinny:
“Hopefully not one of those given a debut never to be seen again.

He looked decent.”

I agree, him and Varela have impressed me in the full back positions when they have been given a chance.

I am not getting my hopes up though about them getting more of a look in, if José arrives.
batdude_uk1
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by TheMunch:
“The young players would benefit from having a player of Falcao's former quality, they learn from that. Takes pressure off themselves and they have someone to look up to and learn from.”

This is something that I have been advocating for a while, another experienced striker would do wonders for us on and off the pitch.
TheMunch
11-04-2016
I didn't mean experienced, I mean world class. Talent breeds more talent, it raises the bar and other players raise their game as a result and can even play above themselves. With players like Suárez and Sturridge we had players like Raheem Sterling playing well and contributing towards our 13/14 title challenge, lose Suárez and they lose some of that drive.
Eddie hunter
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by batdude_uk1:
“So now you would like us to sign another striker, even though you have said previously that there would be no point as we only play with one up front, so it would be pointless in signing anyone else!

Make up your mind!

In the case you are talking about, maybe LvG thought he would be fine with the amount of strikers at his disposal?
He would have been very wring on that, but that might have been part of the reason for not replacing Falcao or Hernandez/RvP.”

Dont try to be smart, it doesn't suit you.

I have never said I didn't want another striker. I have said that when Van Gaal this season decided that he was only playing one up front and decided that Rooney was undroppable then there was no point bringing in another striker to not play either. Ive been through this a million times.

From last summer in order to kick on I would have replaced Falcao and Di Maria and I dont understand why we went from the situation of signing them in the first place to deciding we didn't need either of those type of established quality players in the space of a season.
Nova21
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by TheMunch:
“I didn't mean experienced, I mean world class. Talent breeds more talent, it raises the bar and other players raise their game as a result and can even play above themselves. With players like Suárez and Sturridge we had players like Raheem Sterling playing well and contributing towards our 13/14 title challenge, lose Suárez and they lose some of that drive.”

Same diff. They needed to sign a goalscorer. I think its hard to deny that really, whaetever system they play.
Jamesp84
11-04-2016
The talk doing the rounds was that Borthwick-Jackson had some sort of panic attack during the Shrewsbury cup game, leading to him being subbed at half time.

They don't know what caused it but it spooked the coaching staff sufficiently for him to be missing ever since.
batdude_uk1
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by TheMunch:
“I didn't mean experienced, I mean world class. Talent breeds more talent, it raises the bar and other players raise their game as a result and can even play above themselves. With players like Suárez and Sturridge we had players like Raheem Sterling playing well and contributing towards our 13/14 title challenge, lose Suárez and they lose some of that drive.”

Oh yes there is that aspect to think about as well, and it would be great to have that extra body so that others could learn and improve from.
If say Rashford could learn a few things from having (frlm a purely hypothetical basis) Ibrahimovic around for a season, and improved just being around and playing with him, then that would be to our benefit in the long run.
TheMunch
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by Nova21:
“Same diff. They needed to sign a goalscorer. I think its hard to deny that really, whaetever system they play.”

No there's a difference between what's considered world class and experienced. Sometimes it can be both but not necessarily.

I didn't say they don't need to sign a goalscorer though, and I haven't denied anything.
batdude_uk1
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by Eddie hunter:
“Dont try to be smart, it doesn't suit you.

I have never said I didn't want another striker. I have said that when Van Gaal this season decided that he was only playing one up front and decided that Rooney was undroppable then there was no point bringing in another striker to not play either. Ive been through this a million times.

From last summer in order to kick on I would have replaced Falcao and Di Maria and I dont understand why we went from the situation of signing them in the first place to deciding we didn't need either of those type of established quality players in the space of a season.”

It is nice of you to come round to my point of view eventually for once.

We have needed an extra for a while, we got very lucky with Rashford adapting to first team level as well as he has done, as really seeing as he was behind Wilson, Fletcher and Keane (and possibly even Powell) n the supposed pecking order for the striking position for our younger players, he really shouldn't have been as good as he was, so that was a huge break for LvG.

Bringing in another striker would have kept Rooney on his toes (and as we have seen LvG prefers Martial out wide rather than up front, as he had the option of doing so v Spurs, but decided in his wisdom to rather play Young up front than him), and it would have meant that we wouldn't have been scrambling around as we were for strikers when Rooney got his injury.

Not replacing Falcao (and in turn RvP and Hernandez) was a mistake, as this left us really short of options in the striking department, and we are still suffering to this day because of this decision.
Rashford, as good a talent as he is; is playing above himself at the moment, and we really could do with someone more experienced to just take the pressure off of him a tad.
Nova21
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by TheMunch:
“No there's a difference between what's considered world class and experienced. Sometimes it can be both but not necessarily.

I didn't say they don't need to sign a goalscorer though, and I haven't denied anything.”

Fair do's. Wasnt talking about you denying it, just any Man United fans in general.
batdude_uk1
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by TheMunch:
“No there's a difference between what's considered world class and experienced. Sometimes it can be both but not necessarily.

I didn't say they don't need to sign a goalscorer though, and I haven't denied anything.”

Would you say Ibrahimovic covers both the world class and experienced tag? If so then he could turn out to be beneficial on and off of the pitch.
TheMunch
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by batdude_uk1:
“Would you say Ibrahimovic covers both the world class and experienced tag? If so then he could turn out to be beneficial on and off of the pitch.”

Possibly, yes. He'll be a gamble, of course, could either turn out to be RvP or Falcao but he's in that bracket.
big brother 9
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by batdude_uk1:
“Would you say Ibrahimovic covers both the world class and experienced tag? If so then he could turn out to be beneficial on and off of the pitch.”

I'd be shocked if anyone said that Ibrahimovic wasn't world class and experienced.
Eddie hunter
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by batdude_uk1:
“It is nice of you to come round to my point of view eventually for once.”

I havent.

Quote:
“We have needed an extra for a while, we got very lucky with Rashford adapting to first team level as well as he has done, as really seeing as he was behind Wilson, Fletcher and Keane (and possibly even Powell) n the supposed pecking order for the striking position for our younger players, he really shouldn't have been as good as he was, so that was a huge break for LvG.”

He is playing only because of injuries. If we didn't have any injuries he wouldn't have been anywhere near the team and Rooney would still be up front on his own.

Quote:
“Bringing in another striker would have kept Rooney on his toes (and as we have seen LvG prefers Martial out wide rather than up front, as he had the option of doing so v Spurs, but decided in his wisdom to rather play Young up front than him), and it would have meant that we wouldn't have been scrambling around as we were for strikers when Rooney got his injury.”

You are talking the same way as the last time we had this discussion and it no more true no that it was then. Rooney wouldn't be "kept on his toes" because Rooney is never dropped. As long as we were playing one up front in the rigid Van Gaal formation nothing was going to change.

Quote:
“Not replacing Falcao (and in turn RvP and Hernandez) was a mistake, as this left us really short of options in the striking department, and we are still suffering to this day because of this decision.”

It was only a mistake if we were going to play with a more attacking formation but Van Gaal has bizarrely decided one the way we have been playing all season. I would have replaced them and Val Gaal should have but then Van Gaal should be playing a more expansive game than he is.

Quote:
“Rashford, as good a talent as he is; is playing above himself at the moment, and we really could do with someone more experienced to just take the pressure off of him a tad.”

Yet you have only just finished saying a couple of days ago that you didn't want a manager coming in and signing a striker that would hurt the development of Rashford.
Jamesp84
11-04-2016
Rooney played an hour tonight, from the bits I saw he still looks some way off being ready to return to the first team.
f_196
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by Jamesp84:
“Rooney played an hour tonight, from the bits I saw he still looks some way off being ready to return to the first team.”

Expect him to play Saturday then. In goal.
batdude_uk1
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by Eddie hunter:
“I havent.

By saying that you would have preferred that Falcao was replaced, by I am guessing here another striker, you are coming round to my point of view, which was that we should have signed another striker.


He is playing only because of injuries. If we didn't have any injuries he wouldn't have been anywhere near the team and Rooney would still be up front on his own.

Yes we know that injuries have played a huge role here.

You are talking the same way as the last time we had this discussion and it no more true no that it was then. Rooney wouldn't be "kept on his toes" because Rooney is never dropped. As long as we were playing one up front in the rigid Van Gaal formation nothing was going to change.

Bringing in an older, more experienced striker would have allowed for more options, and would have given LvG more chance to rotate.
Seeing as the manager clearly sees Martial as a player that can only really play out wide, then, another striker would have had his fair share of chances, as Rooney although a favourite of LvG, wouldn't have been able to play all of the matches.


It was only a mistake if we were going to play with a more attacking formation but Van Gaal has bizarrely decided one the way we have been playing all season. I would have replaced them and Val Gaal should have but then Van Gaal should be playing a more expansive game than he is.

It was a mistake as letting Falcao leave onto of RvP and Hernandez left us in a position of only having one experienced striker in Rooney.
Martial was brought in, and he is a great signing, but he is still young, and is apparently seen as only a wide player, so that leaves us really short of options.
We tried Keane, and Powell, those two didn't really work out, so we were really running out of options when we threw in Rashford, as a last gasp chance.


Yet you have only just finished saying a couple of days ago that you didn't want a manager coming in and signing a striker that would hurt the development of Rashford.”

Rashford as good a young talent as he is, is not at the stage yet where he can lead the line for a full season, so bringing in someone older, more experienced with whom he can learn from, and that can help us in terms if options to select from, as Rooney alone can't do it anymore.
batdude_uk1
11-04-2016
Originally Posted by Jamesp84:
“Rooney played an hour tonight, from the bits I saw he still looks some way off being ready to return to the first team.”

He came off and went down the tunnel with a medical person, hopefully nothing too serious.

With Spurs beating Sunderland, and our win tonight, we only need two points from our remaining two games I think it is to secure the title, which would be a boost to those at that level.
RevengeofthMojo
11-04-2016
I'd rather Rooney didn't come back anytime soon.

Yes he's been a great servant, yes he's broken records, yes occasionally he has a great input. For me though, the guy is shot and absolutely no good up front on his own.

This diabolical formation and constant messing about with people in the wrong positions is frustrating me more than anything else.

I mean FFS, Martial on the wing and Young up front. Darmian and F-M in the WRONG sodding full back positions.

I actually feel incredibly sorry for Darmian. He was heavily criticised for 2 if not 3 of Spurs' goals but the guy's confidence must be shot to bits. He is a very very good full back, an Italy international and he cannot get a sodding game in his natural position and is constantly either coming off ahead of his time, or coming on when it is so difficult for him to get used to the pace of the game.

I have seriously had it with LVG. Time for a clean slate and start again.

Yes I'm ranting, so sorry for that, but I had to let it out! It's just absolutely incredible to me how many ridiculously simple decisions he gets wrong. He is incompetant as far as I'm concerned.
Jamesp84
11-04-2016
Funny you should mention Darmian, for me he is the perfect example of how Van Gaal has mismanaged the squad. In his first few games he genuinely looked like the real deal. Since then he's succumbed to philosophy and looks a shadow of that player.

I struggle to accept that he's not good enough and that another manager wouldn't get more out of him, and the same applies to a significant number of our squad.
Conor McHale
11-04-2016
What would people here make of a potential deal for Ibrahimovic?
<<
<
68 of 388
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map