DS Forums

 
 

So where is Class?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18-03-2016, 19:39
Abomination
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London or Valencia
Posts: 5,733
SJA was definitely far more mature than Torchwood, despite the intended audiences. Torchwood was essentially a teenager's show, even if it wasn't trying to be, indulging itself in things it thought made it adult and ending up looking more like the kind of ridiculous low-budget horror movie you rent from Poundland. SJA actually dealt with grown up themes that Torchwood didn't even touch until Children of Earth.

I don't have high hopes for Class, but if it's more SJA-quality than Torchwood then it's definitely on the right track.
In its defence there were still a small handful of stories I very much enjoyed in Series 1 and 2 that were handled very well. I felt that Out of Time in Series 1 was very good - no alien threat, no impending doom, just three ordinary people who fell out of the 1950's and landed in the present day. It was a great human drama which played out very well. Series 2's Adrift was also very human - just an ordinary teenager who was swept up by the rift and then spat back out, left insane after being sent to a burning world where he looked into the heart of a Dark Star. I looked into it after being somewhat surprised it was a Chibnall script (I don't usually rate them that highly) and it was produced after only a second draft, and was what essentially paved the way for Series 3 - more human stories, dealing with morality and loss. Fragments wasn't too bad either for very similar reasons.

It seems, to me at least, Torchwood was at its best when it was at its bleakest too
Abomination is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 18-03-2016, 22:23
Sam_Gee1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 697
I wonder if the show will be closer to SJA, in terms of tone or closer to Torchwood. That will definitely decide what its audience will be, and i have no clue what is in plan for the show. Which is a massive problem, people need to know more about this show.
Sam_Gee1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18-03-2016, 22:40
tiggerpooh
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: 100 Acre Wood
Posts: 4,110
I think SJA did well though, at least people generally seemed to like it. To be fair, it was Sarah Jane.
Yes it was. It was the same Sarah from the Third and Fourth Doctor's times, but older obviously, as it was 2007.

Something that has been playing on my mind on/off for a few days; I was watching The Five Doctors on DVD about a week ago. Sarah was there, and we got a glimpse of K9 just before she got taken by Borussa to The Death Zone on Gallifrey. Sarah doesn't remember any of this, does she? That part would have been wiped by the Time Lords after she went back to England and K9 in 1983. Am I right?
tiggerpooh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-03-2016, 23:09
Lord Smexy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,506
Yes it was. It was the same Sarah from the Third and Fourth Doctor's times, but older obviously, as it was 2007.

Something that has been playing on my mind on/off for a few days; I was watching The Five Doctors on DVD about a week ago. Sarah was there, and we got a glimpse of K9 just before she got taken by Borussa to The Death Zone on Gallifrey. Sarah doesn't remember any of this, does she? That part would have been wiped by the Time Lords after she went back to England and K9 in 1983. Am I right?
I'm not sure, but it's a reasonable idea and makes sense, so I'm going with that. :P

I think The Five Doctors often gets glossed over in Who continuity. The Eight Doctors picked up on it quite a bit, also written by Terrance Dicks, but if I remember right just raised a bunch of new plot holes of its own.
Lord Smexy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2016, 07:22
Theophile
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,831
There are many 19th and 20th century works for children now considered "classics".
Alice in Wonderland
Huckleberry Finn
Lord of the Flies
The Hobbit
Grimm's Fairy Tales
Pinocchio
Gulliver's Travels
Ender's Game
Theophile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2016, 13:24
Lord Smexy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,506
In its defence there were still a small handful of stories I very much enjoyed in Series 1 and 2 that were handled very well. I felt that Out of Time in Series 1 was very good - no alien threat, no impending doom, just three ordinary people who fell out of the 1950's and landed in the present day. It was a great human drama which played out very well. Series 2's Adrift was also very human - just an ordinary teenager who was swept up by the rift and then spat back out, left insane after being sent to a burning world where he looked into the heart of a Dark Star. I looked into it after being somewhat surprised it was a Chibnall script (I don't usually rate them that highly) and it was produced after only a second draft, and was what essentially paved the way for Series 3 - more human stories, dealing with morality and loss. Fragments wasn't too bad either for very similar reasons.

It seems, to me at least, Torchwood was at its best when it was at its bleakest too
There were the occasional episodes that told some pretty good stories, like the ones you mentioned. If I remember right, though, Out of Time was another one where the sex was a little on the excessive side.

I looked up what the writers were for SJA, not having seen it in a while, and it seems most of my favourite episodes from the show were done by Phil Ford. Which makes sense, as I've adored the two episodes he's worked on for Doctor Who (The Waters of Mars and Into the Dalek).
Lord Smexy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-03-2016, 15:42
dave_windows
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,365
Adult themes dosen't have to be about swearing and rumpy-pumpy. Plenty of printed sci-fi, as well as cinema, deal with adult issues without anyone loosing their knickers down the back of an acceleration couch.

Saying that, Class will be aimed at kids, so older viewers probably won't see much in it, no matter if it is good or not.
If it wasent for older adults the kids wouldnt see it in the first place. Only reason they watch who is parents forcing them to watch it and then they enjoy the show.
dave_windows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2016, 19:36
Whovian1109
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,689
Speaking as a huge fan of Patrick Ness' work, I think that there's a vast difference between young adult drama and the likes of SJA that was aimed predominantly at children. Young adult drama tends to be very intelligent and thought provoking whilst picking up on a variety of interesting themes and people writing off Class before they know anything about it clearly look down on the genre for their own reasons, when it's produced some exceptional literary material like Harry Potter and Hunger Games, not to mention other classics previously mentioned.
Whovian1109 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-03-2016, 19:46
dave_windows
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,365
Maybe we will see a young Chesterton.
dave_windows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-03-2016, 18:55
CD93
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Wilderness
Posts: 13,088
Class announcements to come after Easter.

- Ness
CD93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-03-2016, 14:49
Shawn_Lunn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scattered
Posts: 7,448
Girly Letters is speculating at least two cast members - Fady Elsayed and Greg Austin.

Some of the things both guys have tweeted recently are a little suspect. Patrick Ness is also following them ....

https://twitter.com/GirlyLetters?ref...Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Shawn_Lunn is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 27-03-2016, 21:16
pferreira
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 142
you may of 'hated it' but it got commissioned for 4 series, which just on it's own shows it was successful, and also it's ratings went up substantially every series for the first three. I'm not going to try and defend miracle day, but the first three series were great in quality in my opinion, and successful in terms of factual evidence.
Not really. Season 1 started with good ratings but went downhill once people started seeing how bad it was. The show was given a second chance and a bit of a re-tool bringing in James Masters in an attempt to improve ratings. This helped to begin with but some episodes in the ratings slipped again. For Children of Earth RTD took the budget for the 13 episodes planned and used it to make five episodes. With the obvious epic scale to the whole thing and with RTD behind it BBC moved it to BBC1 where it was shown primetime and did great. It really didn't do well the first few seasons and factual evidence will tell you this.
pferreira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-03-2016, 21:25
doctor blue box
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,355
Not really. Season 1 started with good ratings but went downhill once people started seeing how bad it was. The show was given a second chance and a bit of a re-tool bringing in James Masters in an attempt to improve ratings. This helped to begin with but some episodes in the ratings slipped again. For Children of Earth RTD took the budget for the 13 episodes planned and used it to make five episodes. With the obvious epic scale to the whole thing and with RTD behind it BBC moved it to BBC1 where it was shown primetime and did great. It really didn't do well the first few seasons and factual evidence will tell you this.
My comment wasn't an opinion, I was commenting on 'factual evidence'.

Series 1 - lowest viewing figure of any episode was 830,000,
series 2 - lowest viewing figure was 3.13 million
series 3 - lowest viewing figure - 6.14 million

So, like I said, the viewing figures went up substantially every series for the first three.
doctor blue box is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-03-2016, 12:04
JAS84
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hull, UK
Posts: 7,363
My comment wasn't an opinion, I was commenting on 'factual evidence'.

Series 1 - lowest viewing figure of any episode was 830,000,
series 2 - lowest viewing figure was 3.13 million
series 3 - lowest viewing figure - 6.14 million

So, like I said, the viewing figures went up substantially every series for the first three.
Series 1 was on BBC 3, series 2 on BBC 2 and series 3 on BBC 1, so no surprise there.
JAS84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-03-2016, 20:54
doctor blue box
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,355
Series 1 was on BBC 3, series 2 on BBC 2 and series 3 on BBC 1, so no surprise there.
Another indicator of it being a success that it was bumped up each time.
doctor blue box is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-03-2016, 00:27
doctor blue box
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,355
News of a cast member for 'class' for those interested.

http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2016-...spin-off-class

Not an official announcement, but the article has a screen grab of an online profile of his where it says 'currently shooting a series regular role in 'Class', the new doctor who spinoff series for bbc3', so as close to official as you can get really.
doctor blue box is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2016, 14:38
Shawn_Lunn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scattered
Posts: 7,448
We're getting an announcement on Monday for the show, so we'll know then who has been cast.
Shawn_Lunn is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 12:16
amos_brearley
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spain with Annie
Posts: 7,954
Everyone snoozing?


http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/lat...016/class-cast
amos_brearley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 12:19
Lord Smexy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,506
"Class is dark and sexy..."

Oh... I heard that one before. :P
Lord Smexy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 12:20
CD93
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: The Wilderness
Posts: 13,088
Katherine Kelly was unexpected.
CD93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 12:39
Shawn_Lunn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scattered
Posts: 7,448
Bit of a shame they didn't give us some character names. Odd too actually but other than that, intrigued and Katherine Kelly is great casting.
Shawn_Lunn is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 12:50
Michael_Eve
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,080
Don't really watch the soaps, not since the Nineties, but see bits when visiting the folks. Last time I watched regularly off my own bat was Corrie, because I'd seen and been impressed by Katherine Kelly. Lost interest after she left, but have seen her in other things and been impressed. I think she's a fine actor.

I was always going to give this a look anyway, but am most pleased with this casting.
Michael_Eve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 13:03
Shevk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Online
Posts: 1,107
I'm not convinced by what else I've seen and heard about this series so far, but Katherine Kelly is astounding casting and completely out of left field. I don't think anyone could have predicted an actress - who is so in demand at the moment - of her calibre taking the lead adult role.

Her work on the final series of Mr Selfridge blew me away and I loved her presence in The Night Manager and Happy Valley, playing entirely different characters. If she is be relatively prominent then I'll be certain now to tune in.

Coincidentally, Class is not the first supernatural drama series she will be starring in this year:

http://www.itv.com/presscentre/press...whitehead-star

On an related note, it's a bit surreal that Greg Austin is playing a 6th form pupil considering Gordon was around 30 years old in the last series of Mr Selfridge, heavily involved in his father's business and with two children and a wife.
Shevk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 13:23
Shawn_Lunn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Scattered
Posts: 7,448
I had some reservations and it could still go either way but the casting has given me more confidence in it.
Shawn_Lunn is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2016, 13:31
GDK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,881
I'm not convinced by what else I've seen and heard about this series so far, but Katherine Kelly is astounding casting and completely out of left field. I don't think anyone could have predicted an actress - who is so in demand at the moment - of her calibre taking the lead adult role.

Her work on the final series of Mr Selfridge blew me away and I loved her presence in The Night Manager and Happy Valley, playing entirely different characters. If she is be relatively prominent then I'll be certain now to tune in.

Coincidentally, Class is not the first supernatural drama series she will be starring in this year:

http://www.itv.com/presscentre/press...whitehead-star

On an related note, it's a bit surreal that Greg Austin is playing a 6th form pupil considering Gordon was around 30 years old in the last series of Mr Selfridge, heavily involved in his father's business and with two children and a wife.
BIB: Supernatural? Really? One thing that Doctor Who has never had is anything truly supernatural. There have been things that appeared to be supernatural at first but they've always turned out to have a scientific explanation. If it is going to have "real" ghosts it doesn't belong in the Doctor Who universe.
GDK is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:12.