|
||||||||
Jessie Wallace in the tabloids already... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,536
|
Jessie Wallace in the tabloids already...
Just looking at today's newspapers, Jessie Wallace is on the front page of three tabloids!
Daily Mirror - 'Jessie Jilts Lover' Daily Star - '£200k Kitty for Kat' The Sun - 'Kat's yer lot Dave' Grr... why don't they find something more important to write about?! |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,275
|
But Jessie's love-life is important! Don't you want to know about the ins and outs of her private life?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 22,354
|
They've split up again?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 'Come here Muffin Clarke'!
Posts: 1,768
|
I didn't know they'd got back together? I'm really confused...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,430
|
Jessie probably tips the papers off herself..she loves publicity
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Fenland
Posts: 814
|
I really can't stand Kat/Jessie. I know she is attractive, but this is always viewed through layers and layers of yukky make-up. This is not true beauty in my eyes. A tart on and off screen. I really find her replusive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Cotswolds, Gloucestershire
Posts: 191
|
Exactly.
Who cares and I agree it looks like she tips the papers off herself. I cant stand her and certainly dont want her back in EE. As for her so say being attractive not in a million years. Although I believe she has lost a couple of stone in weight since her last EE appearence so this may be an improvement. What did not help was EE wardrobe department insisting on squeezing her into clothes three sizes too small....not a pretty sight. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pinch Me, I'm Dreaming....
Posts: 4,783
|
Saw that 'Jessie Jilts Lover' title on News 24. Personally, I don't care.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Greenwich, London.
Posts: 4,692
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ugleefukka
Exactly.
Who cares and I agree it looks like she tips the papers off herself. I cant stand her and certainly dont want her back in EE. As for her so say being attractive not in a million years. Although I believe she has lost a couple of stone in weight since her last EE appearence so this may be an improvement. What did not help was EE wardrobe department insisting on squeezing her into clothes three sizes too small....not a pretty sight. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huch'net
Daily Mirror - 'Jessie Jilts Lover'
Daily Star - '£200k Kitty for Kat' The Sun - 'Kat's yer lot Dave' Grr... why don't they find something more important to write about?!
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 10,410
|
These newspapers should give her some privacy. Let's face it, we wouldn't want our private lifes splashed all over the tabloids.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,553
|
I’m glad they didn’t stay together for the “sake of their daughter” – that’s the lamest reason on the list and I should know. If you’re not happy in a relationship, a child really isn’t going to make much difference unless you do genuinely love each other.
As for Dave I hope he disappears into oblivion now (as apposed to moving on to the next celeb) and I have to agree about Jessie not being attractive – this has nothing to do with her weight – she’s just nothing special. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:47.

