Originally Posted by Welsh-lad:
“There's always a dislike of the older woman in this. Val atm. One can see the reason why they seem to disappear off our TVs in nearly all genres after a certain age.
Perhaps Jane gets away with it (for now) for glamming herself up and not looking 61.”
Er... no. 'Old women on GBBO get grief. Except some old women, but then they aren't obviously old women anyway'. That's not really a strong argument
I don't think Val gets a bit of bad press/ poor review on here because she's old, it's because she's a bit... eccentric. Some people like that, some people find it irritating. Also I suspect, as she's also not a particularly strong contestant (bottom third, I'd say), people who are looking on it from the competitive angle just want her done and out of the way a bit so we get more footage of the better bakers.
Quote:
“If by 'getting lucky', people mean Val outperformed another baker (at least two bakers this time actually) then, yeah, that is kind of the aim of the game.”
Absolutely agree, if she performs well enough she gets to stay. Kate has generally done quite well so far but had one bad week and she's gone. That is, to use a phrase, the way the cookie crumbles.
Personally i think Tom should have gone rather than Kate - his first round was SO bad frankly they should just have walked him out of the tent at that point. And (IIRC) he didn't do all that well in the other rounds. However he can make interesting things that do work, whereas Kate is very conventional in what she does. I suspect Tom's potential may have saved him, when his results this week were actually the worst.