|
||||||||
Maigret - ITV |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#76 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 8,098
|
I read some of the comments on this thread before watching the programme this evening so I wasn't actually prepared for what followed.
This was a beautifully filmed old school slow burn detective drama - loved every minute of it. Not once did I think RA was miscast in the role, I didn't expect him to smile and never once did the image of Mr Bean come into my head. I very much liked the way he played Maigret. I just think this sort of drama is totally wasted on many of you. I would suggest you stick to things like 'Die Hard' etc. I can remember Rupert Davies in the original so this brought back memories for me. Perhaps someone will revive Harry Lime and make The Third Man next.
|
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 5,739
|
Quote:
Not once did I think RA was miscast in the role, I didn't expect him to smile and never once did the image of Mr Bean come into my head.
I thought he was excellent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West Oxfordshire
Posts: 11,632
|
I have just watched it. I thought it was very atmospheric and beautifully lit, shot, costumed, sets etc.
It was old-fashioned in the sense that the serial killer did not leave endless bizarre intellectual clues, there was no political conspiracy or jaded cynicism, everyone in it was - shock horror - white, the role and place of women was not updated with ahistorical feminism, there was not a massive cast of suspects and it was not filmed on wobbly cam with no shot longer than a nanosecond. What was brilliant about it was the moment Maigret uncovered the killer by saying something like 'you have only now asked why we are here' - a simple but devastating plot device, and the 1950s period psychology. Some of this may have made it seem dated but Simenon started writing Maigret over 80 years ago and it is the genre of those times. I also thought Atkinson and Cohu were really well paired. I think it will work well as a replacement for Poirot on Sunday nights. |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 644
|
Boring and bland but I did enjoy the fashions of the era and the look of Paris in the 1950's. This was the main reason I stuck with it. I felt Maigret was too underplayed and could not really get into it at all, I felt like saying for goodness sake wake up man at least have a little impact. I recorded it and watched about half and then the other half last night and it was a bit of a struggle to get through.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 1,656
|
In the Rupert Davies series, Maigret's sidekick Lucas played an important role as a foil for the boss. I don't remember the Michael Gambon series so clearly, so I'm not sure if the same applied. In this version Maigret came across as a loner with nobody to share his thoughts with. This left him looking wooden.
The car - and the 50s cityscapes, whether Paris or Budapest - was the star. |
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 20,484
|
The Rupert Davies original TV series managed to fit a story into less than 60 minutes.
This latest one was turgid and bloated at twice the length. |
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,537
|
TBH when they copped the suspect only halfway in I thought they must have got the wrong man and that maybe he was keeping schtum to protect his wife who was the real perp. I got that the wrong way round then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 569
|
I know it was filmed in Budapest but I thought it captured the feel of post-war Paris well. I could almost smell the Gauloise.
I also thought Rowan A did a good job and played it just right, and as I'd imagined the character to be from the books - he was Maigret, not Dirty Harry |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,543
|
I was too tired to watch the end. Can someone tell me, was the killer the architect-decorator guy? I switched off after the mother/prison scene.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,487
|
Quote:
I was too tired to watch the end. Can someone tell me, was the killer the architect-decorator guy? I switched off after the mother/prison scene.
Spoiler
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 726
|
Quote:
The Rupert Davies original TV series managed to fit a story into less than 60 minutes.
They also didn't tackle this story until towards the end of the third series. |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Upminster
Posts: 951
|
Simenon wrote some of Rupert Davies episodes. His last Maigret story was in 1972
Rupert Davies's Maigret was also contemporary and not set in the past. |
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 361
|
was prepared not to like it as I loved the Gambon version, and I hated the trailer, but I really enjoyed it and hope it becomes a regular thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Schar's World
Posts: 473
|
I thought it was total shit even by ITV's low standards. Atkinson was woefully miscast and the story was just dull.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 726
|
Quote:
Simenon wrote some of Rupert Davies episodes. His last Maigret story was in 1972
Rupert Davies's Maigret was also contemporary and not set in the past. John Simenon seems as happy with Atkinson playing Maigret as his father was with Davies, if you believe the interviews. |
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,800
|
it was hard to banish Blackadder from my mind but on the whole I enjoyed it and will watch the next one. Two hours was luxury... why do some people want it all over in 50 minutes, for heaven's sake? It was a worthy follow up to Poirot - if not quite in that league
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dagenham Essex UK
Posts: 9,714
|
Approached this with trepidation if I am honest, as I was a fan of the Rupert Davies version. Well, I admit that I was wrong and RA played Maigret brilliantly.
Pacing and atmosphere felt right, the dialogue was sharp, and the camera work was easy on the eye. The first thing that I felt was that this had a very similar pacing and direction to Foyle's War which is a favourite of mine. Only downer is that we will have to wait months for the next one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 880
|
Quote:
I have just watched it. I thought it was very atmospheric and beautifully lit, shot, costumed, sets etc.
It was old-fashioned in the sense that the serial killer did not leave endless bizarre intellectual clues, there was no political conspiracy or jaded cynicism, everyone in it was - shock horror - white, the role and place of women was not updated with ahistorical feminism, there was not a massive cast of suspects and it was not filmed on wobbly cam with no shot longer than a nanosecond. What was brilliant about it was the moment Maigret uncovered the killer by saying something like 'you have only now asked why we are here' - a simple but devastating plot device, and the 1950s period psychology. Some of this may have made it seem dated but Simenon started writing Maigret over 80 years ago and it is the genre of those times. I also thought Atkinson and Cohu were really well paired. I think it will work well as a replacement for Poirot on Sunday nights. You should watch the same story with Michael Gambon playing Maigret, it is an hour long episode and is done much better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,180
|
We had never read any Maigret and I hadn't even heard of Rupert Davies and didn't like Blackadder so we came to this with fresh eyes. We thought it was excellent and are now eager for more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 8,098
|
Quote:
I thought it was total shit even by ITV's low standards. Atkinson was woefully miscast and the story was just dull.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 8,098
|
Quote:
You should watch the same story with Michael Gambon playing Maigret, it is an hour long episode and is done much better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 8,098
|
Quote:
it was hard to banish Blackadder from my mind but on the whole I enjoyed it and will watch the next one. Two hours was luxury... why do some people want it all over in 50 minutes, for heaven's sake? It was a worthy follow up to Poirot - if not quite in that league
What they would make of radio drama goodness only knows. I love radio drama as I find the scripts have through necessity to be more descriptive and yet leave ones mind to conjure up the scene. |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,347
|
So the wife tried to get mum to take the rap? why did he hate his wife? was he really gay?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dagenham Essex UK
Posts: 9,714
|
Quote:
So the wife tried to get mum to take the rap? why did he hate his wife? was he really gay?
1..No, the mother WANTED to take the "blame" for the last murder as in her twisted mind it would prove to the son how much she cared for him. 2...Because she like his mother controlled him, he couldn't live his own life as he was told all the time that he was special, when in truth he knew he was a failure. 3...You had the same notion my OH had in that he was a repressed gay who was unable to live their "real" life, and were smothered under the so called love of both women so struck out against those he could easily attack. Whether or not the character was actually gay is unknowable except for George Simenon who created the story. |
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 880
|
Quote:
I have and totally disagree - sorry.
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:07.




I thought he was excellent.
