|
||||||||
Rose Tyler in 2012 |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,939
|
Rose Tyler in 2012
Maybe a Who fan can help me out,
Rose Tyler would be 26 in 2012, if she had returned to Earth before 2012 would she be able to bump into her 26 year old self in tonights episode if they had gone back to London 2012? Hope that makes sense. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
No she wouldn't. In 2005 Rose left Earth in the Tardis and would not be on Earth in 2012. But of she went back in time to, say, 1992, she could see herself.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bristol
Posts: 1,043
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cifpower
No she wouldn't. In 2005 Rose left Earth in the Tardis and would not be on Earth in 2012. But of she went back in time to, say, 1992, she could see herself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,939
|
Ok so another thing , in theory then if the Dalek had killed Rose, the Doctor could of get in the TARDIS and gone back to the 'start' of that episode and killed the Dalek.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,939
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregmantis
How do we know that she didn't go back to Earth a minute or so after her mother walked off last week, after having been journeying around with the Doctor for a bit? The only way she won't exist in 2012 is if a) she never returns, b) she returns after 2012. or c) she returns before 2012 but dies at some point before it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polly_Perkins
Ok so another thing , in theory then if the Dalek had killed Rose, the Doctor could of get in the TARDIS and gone back to the 'start' of that episode and killed the Dalek.
The Dalek kills Rose, so the Doctor goes back to kill the Dalek. Rose isn't killed, so everything is fine. But it's not ![]() If Rose wasn't killed, the Doctor doesn't have a need to go back in time, so he doesn't kill the Dalek, so it kills Rose, so he goes back and so forth. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,939
|
Why would they be stuck in that loop? The Doctor would be the only one with the true memory of what happened so would know killing the Dalek early on would prevent the death of Rose. So he could go back in time, kill the Dalek. The future changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
It depends how you look at time travel. Actually, in dundee_mark's case, the Doctor that would go back in time to kill the dalek couldn't exist.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,939
|
So the Doctor cant alter the future by going back in time?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Not when it involves himself.
But has the Doctor actually altered the past or the future deliberately? |
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,939
|
Mmmm ok. So in the film the Daleks invade Earth in 2150 AD, yet in 2012 the last Dalek is supposedly killed.
So if that were the case would that mean that 2150 doesnt happen? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dundee
Posts: 7,475
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polly_Perkins
Mmmm ok. So in the film the Daleks invade Earth in 2150 AD, yet in 2012 the last Dalek is supposedly killed.
So if that were the case would that mean that 2150 doesnt happen? )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Mansfield
Posts: 27,514
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polly_Perkins
Mmmm ok. So in the film the Daleks invade Earth in 2150 AD, yet in 2012 the last Dalek is supposedly killed.
So if that were the case would that mean that 2150 doesnt happen? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Rotherham, South Yorkshire
Posts: 814
|
But didn't the Dalek that was captured in last nights episode slip through time and end up on Earth as part of the Time War ?
So in effect 2150 did happen ?? (Totally confused )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dundee
Posts: 7,475
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dazzy D
But didn't the Dalek that was captured in last nights episode slip through time and end up on Earth as part of the Time War ?
So in effect 2150 did happen ?? (Totally confused )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,939
|
So are none of the Daleks on Earth episode set on Earth beyond 2012?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The dark side of the moon
Posts: 51,361
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anthony Haines
It depends how you look at time travel. Actually, in dundee_mark's case, the Doctor that would go back in time to kill the dalek couldn't exist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: in ma hoose
Posts: 4,211
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dundee_mark
That would create a very annoying paradox.
The Dalek kills Rose, so the Doctor goes back to kill the Dalek. Rose isn't killed, so everything is fine. But it's not ![]() If Rose wasn't killed, the Doctor doesn't have a need to go back in time, so he doesn't kill the Dalek, so it kills Rose, so he goes back and so forth. *****brain explodes***** |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 131
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dundee_mark
That would create a very annoying paradox.
The Dalek kills Rose, so the Doctor goes back to kill the Dalek. Rose isn't killed, so everything is fine. But it's not ![]() If Rose wasn't killed, the Doctor doesn't have a need to go back in time, so he doesn't kill the Dalek, so it kills Rose, so he goes back and so forth. Ha - for all we know The Doctor and Rose met the Dalek thousands of times trying out different tactics until it decided not to kill Rose. Causality Paradoxes suck (A-B-C-A). Star Trek uses them all the time, and they never really make sense. Thankfully, Dr Who is usually far cleverer than that. Is it not just a rule that The Doctor is not supposed to cross his own timeline, i think he can, its just forbidden by the Timelords. Seen on screen in The Three Doctors etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Banned User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Pinch Me, I'm Dreaming....
Posts: 4,783
|
I'm really getting a headache, while reading all these!
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dundee
Posts: 7,475
|
I think some of you are confusing Doctor Who with Groundhog Day!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London SE4
Posts: 685
|
guy's guy's please!
time traval goe's both back and forwards as well as (sideway's) havent you seen passed dr who episodes come to that back to the future part 2? changing the past doe's not mean changing the future but mainly creating an alternate one/ time lines?? well i hope that helps |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 131
|
Erm Tv Watcher, thats not right.
The actions in BTTF2 do change the timeline, thats the whole point - they are trying to correct problems that they themselves created by changing the past. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London SE4
Posts: 685
|
come to think of ot sliders is also a good example that used to be on sky one/ bbc2 a good few years back
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kirkby, Liverpool
Posts: 1,107
|
Time travel: Don't even try to understand it.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:22.




)
)
.