|
||||||||
Gareth Thomas (Blake) has died |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#26 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,639
|
Quote:
From what I recall of Blake 7 it was really good at the start when Blake was actually in it. It got progressively worse after he left -i.e. when Avon took over, becoming the star of a show (based on a guy who was no longer in it, and aside from the fact there was no longer seven crew either). But that's not to say Avon taking over was at fault the show got worse, in fact he was the best thing about the show with no Blake in charge. As the show became more erratic in terms of good stories, it lost much of its strong viewing audience (including me) who only occasionally tuned in. Then came the grand finale, and from what I recall it was both a tragic and brilliant end to the show, and definitely worth tuning in for.
Would that be a fair assessment for someone who occasionally watched it no more than once around 35 (good grief -is it that long?) years ago? Blakes's 7 is a must have still to add to my DVD collection and "right up there" (with Space 1999) now that I have all the original remaining Who stories. Although S1 and S2 was more consistent in terms of quality, S3 & S4 contain some of my favourite /most memorable episodes, Edit: I wonder if any viewers lost because of Gareth leaving were made up by viewers gained when Paul became the lead. Lots of hormonal teenage girls had a crush on him,(based on conversations at B7 conventions, lol) I met Gareth more than once. A lovely man |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Id
Posts: 12,241
|
Quote:
From what I recall of Blake 7 it was really good at the start when Blake was actually in it. It got progressively worse after he left -i.e. when Avon took over, becoming the star of a show (based on a guy who was no longer in it, and aside from the fact there was no longer seven crew either). But that's not to say Avon taking over was at fault the show got worse, in fact he was the best thing about the show with no Blake in charge. As the show became more erratic in terms of good stories, it lost much of its strong viewing audience (including me) who only occasionally tuned in. Then came the grand finale, and from what I recall it was both a tragic and brilliant end to the show, and definitely worth tuning in for.
Would that be a fair assessment for someone who occasionally watched it no more than once around 35 (good grief -is it that long?) years ago? Blakes's 7 is a must have still to add to my DVD collection and "right up there" (with Space 1999) now that I have all the original remaining Who stories. Quote:
Indeed. It seemed odd to me to have a series called Blake's 7 in which Blake didn't appear, and neither were there really 7 main characters...
edit - aha, I see that Mr Seta has posted virtually the same as me at the same time! Also, there were always 7! S1 - Blake, Avon, Jenna, Vila, Gan, Cally and Zen S2 - Blake, Avon, Jenna, Vila, Cally, Zen and Gan/Orac (mid season change) S3 - Avon, Vila, Cally, Zen, Orac, Dayna and Tarrant S4 - Avon, Vila, Orac, Dayna, Tarrant, Soolin and Slave |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 3,703
|
Quote:
The series name Blake's 7 went beyond the character of Blake as it went on. It would have been commercial suicide to change it at that time.
Also, there were always 7! S1 - Blake, Avon, Jenna, Vila, Gan, Cally and Zen S2 - Blake, Avon, Jenna, Vila, Cally, Zen and Gan/Orac (mid season change) S3 - Avon, Vila, Cally, Zen, Orac, Dayna and Tarrant S4 - Avon, Vila, Orac, Dayna, Tarrant, Soolin and Slave Also, if the series was called Blake's 7, I would have expected Blake plus his seven, as the title implies seven belonging to Blake, (ignoring the ungrammatical lack of apostrophe in the main titles) and I wouldn't usually include myself when counting in this way....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Id
Posts: 12,241
|
Quote:
Yeah I know it would have been mad to have changed the name of the show, but you must admit it was increasingly odd, even if you include the two computers.... By season four there were only 2 main characters who had known Blake and been part of Blake's actual seven. And I don't recall any of my friends including Slave as part of the team, nor Orac for that matter. Certainly among my friends at the time it was seen as a bit silly to continue with such a title, although obviously I understand why this was done.
Also, if the series was called Blake's 7, I would have expected Blake plus his seven, as the title implies seven belonging to Blake, (ignoring the ungrammatical lack of apostrophe in the main titles) and I wouldn't usually include myself when counting in this way.... ![]() In series 1 Blake explicitly identifies Zen as one of the 7 which open the gates to any sentient AI, travelling with them would be part of the crew. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,881
|
I guess it just shows the risks of naming a new show after the lead character when you haven't locked down the actors' contracts for the next several years.
What would the alternative titles have been? Liberators? (but they changed the ship) The Liberator 7? (but there wasn't always 7) Freedom Fighters in Space? (too much like Pigs in Space) Space Pirates? (just... naff - obviously no-one says "Space..." anything )![]() Perhaps.. Renegades Star Fighters |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651
|
I think it was a smart move not to change the name. Some of the middle-period episodes made the point that the group are significant as figureheads for the resistance - it doesn't really matter whether or not they're led by Blake, or if there's seven of them, the symbol remains the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,080
|
Quote:
I think it was a smart move not to change the name. Some of the middle-period episodes made the point that the group are significant as figureheads for the resistance - it doesn't really matter whether or not they're led by Blake, or if there's seven of them, the symbol remains the same.
If they had decided on a change to reflect the shift in emphasis, how about 'Avon's Calling'?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,355
|
No disrespect to anyone enjoying this thread, but I'm looking at it thinking 'wow, you know there is practically nothing doctor who to talk about when a thread not even about doctor who is not only created, but has reached 2 pages and is staying near the top of the first page of the forum'
This forum really needs some who news. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Id
Posts: 12,241
|
Quote:
No disrespect to anyone enjoying this thread, but I'm looking at it thinking 'wow, you know there is practically nothing doctor who to talk about when a thread not even about doctor who is not only created, but has reached 2 pages and is staying near the top of the first page of the forum'
This forum really needs some who news. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Id
Posts: 12,241
|
Quote:
I guess it just shows the risks of naming a new show after the lead character when you haven't locked down the actors' contracts for the next several years.
What would the alternative titles have been? Liberators? (but they changed the ship) The Liberator 7? (but there wasn't always 7) Freedom Fighters in Space? (too much like Pigs in Space) Space Pirates? (just... naff - obviously no-one says "Space..." anything )![]() Perhaps.. Renegades Star Fighters Also, Blake was always being mentioned during series 3-4, part of series 3 was given over to searching for him. Only in S4 was he not really mentioned until the end, so his presence has been in all 4 series. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,881
|
Quote:
I think it was a smart move not to change the name. Some of the middle-period episodes made the point that the group are significant as figureheads for the resistance - it doesn't really matter whether or not they're led by Blake, or if there's seven of them, the symbol remains the same.
Imagine if they'd called Doctor Who "Ian and Barbara's Adventures in Time and Space". Apart from being a crap title, it doesn't anticipate that Ian and Barbara might leave the show. Or if Babylon 5 had been titled "Sinclair, Station Commander".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,080
|
Quote:
Its way more than just tenuously related though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,314
|
I loved Blake's 7. I enjoyed the most when Gareth was on as Blake. I am sorry to learn of Gareth's passing. My sympathies to his family and friends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
|
Season 2 concluded with the Liberator fighting against an "extra-galactic incursion" where an alien race tried to break down the barrier around Federation space and invade. As I recall, it was essentially the one time Blake's team were fighting on the same side as the Federation.
I heard a story once that Terry Nation had suggested the Daleks could appear in Blake's 7 and this resulted in rumours they would be revealed as the aliens attempting the invasion. Could have been amazing/ruined the show. It never happened anyway. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651
|
Quote:
Could have been amazing/ruined the show. It never happened anyway.
Either the Daleks would have to be pushed back for good (making the exercise feel fairly pointless), or they would dominate the show. I can't see any middle ground working - the Federation needs to be the threat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
|
Quote:
To be diplomatic, I think it would be an unwelcome shift for the show. The show always worked best when man was the real monster, as the saying goes.
Either the Daleks would have to be pushed back for good (making the exercise feel fairly pointless), or they would dominate the show. I can't see any middle ground working - the Federation needs to be the threat. I interviewed Jacqueline Pearce once many years ago. An absolute hoot! |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Id
Posts: 12,241
|
Quote:
And - I must say - Servalan was as terrifying as any Dalek!
I interviewed Jacqueline Pearce once many years ago. An absolute hoot! |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Probably not Syracuse
Posts: 710
|
I too was saddened to hear of Gareth Thomas's death. It's a pity that the Clone Masters were only make-believe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Probably not Syracuse
Posts: 710
|
Quote:
What would the alternative titles have been?
Liberators? (but they changed the ship) The Liberator 7? (but there wasn't always 7) Freedom Fighters in Space? (too much like Pigs in Space) Space Pirates? (just... naff - obviously no-one says "Space..." anything )![]() Perhaps.. Renegades Star Fighters |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,355
|
Quote:
And, no disrespect to you either DBB, but you could just skip it, you know? Agree that some Who news will be nice though. But an icon of BBC SciFi has gone, and I think personally it's fine to acknowledge that and discuss Terry Nation's 'stablemate' series in the circs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 3,703
|
Quote:
As I said, no offence intended. Not one to be one of those self appointed forum police who say a thread shouldn't exist or that it should be closed. More I was just observing that if a thread not about doctor who is the most popular on the forum for doctor who then it just goes to show the 'who news' drought has really gotten bad.
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,639
|
Quote:
No disrespect to anyone enjoying this thread, but I'm looking at it thinking 'wow, you know there is practically nothing doctor who to talk about when a thread not even about doctor who is not only created, but has reached 2 pages and is staying near the top of the first page of the forum'
This forum really needs some who news. |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 139
|
Blakes Seven was the business. It was definitely 70s Dr Who in style. if you haven't seen the Sunmakers, check it out and compare... apart from Michael Keating (Vila) being in it, the story is all about the oppressed workers fighting back against distant and uncaring rulers... And the rebel leader in this Tom Baker story is even wearing a very close approximation of Blakes outfit... Yep, back in the day Dr Who used to do George Orwell...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Peri's Cleavage
Posts: 14,690
|
Quote:
As I said, no offence intended. Not one to be one of those self appointed forum police who say a thread shouldn't exist or that it should be closed. More I was just observing that if a thread not about doctor who is the most popular on the forum for doctor who then it just goes to show the 'who news' drought has really gotten bad.
Indeed there has been posts about actors, directors, writers etc who've done both Doctor Who and Blakes 7 and a lot of chat about other similarities between them. So though the thread isn't directly about Doctor Who, it still being discussed, just in a different way to normal, which is quite refreshing imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 10,234
|
Quote:
Blakes Seven was the business. It was definitely 70s Dr Who in style. if you haven't seen the Sunmakers, check it out and compare... apart from Michael Keating (Vila) being in it, the story is all about the oppressed workers fighting back against distant and uncaring rulers... And the rebel leader in this Tom Baker story is even wearing a very close approximation of Blakes outfit... Yep, back in the day Dr Who used to do George Orwell...
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:08.





