|
||||||||
Microsoft Lumia sales nose dive selling only 2.3 million phones in 3 months |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the future....
Posts: 11,259
|
Microsoft Lumia sales nose dive selling only 2.3 million phones in 3 months
On the back of previous bad results for the final quarter of 2015 Lumia sales have gone into free fall. It sold 2.3 million Lumias over the past three months, which is a 73 percent drop from this time last year when they sold 8.6 million. Microsoft sold 4.5 million in the previous quarter of 2015 which was a 57% drop year on year itself.
Its hard to see Microsoft wanting to stay in the sector unless they want to continue it as a loss leader. http://www.engadget.com/2016/04/21/microsoft-q1-2016/ http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/1374...t-three-months |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,018
|
I don't think anyone is surprised.
If you're not into apps, it's a nice user interface. But people are into apps and BlackBerry had worked this out, switching to Android. I think Microsoft can call it a day and has pretty much put everything it does on iOS and Android so is covered. I've upgraded some of my Windows phones to 10 and it's all well and good except I feel that there's nothing I can do with them. No banking app, no Now TV app, no Amazon video, a buggy version of Tapatalk.. the list goes on. Total waste of time for all but smartphone users who really aren't in the need of a smartphone. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,705
|
Quote:
Total waste of time for all but smartphone users who really aren't in the need of a smartphone.
![]() On my 520 version the camera is absolutely pointless and the only good point is that you can't take selfies with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25,199
|
They are very zen about it. For businesses and enthusiasts. Only it's becoming more and more difficult to stay enthusiastic. Only thing that is still keeping me there is that I dislike other phones more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,293
|
I'm about to switch from my Lumia back to Android. I really like the WP interface but the app situation is just atrocious
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 87
|
I've been through all the phone OS's this year, including BB10, courtesy of free review samples (which have been returned.)
I think the quote that Windows Phone is good for people who don't need a smartphone is pretty apt; even though Android is a data-sucking mess, it gives people the apps they want. BB10 is much more polished and will also run many Android apps from the Amazon Android App store, but the current phones have older SOC's in them, and battery life is poor. The BB Z10, essentially with Qualcomm iPhone 5 innards is particularly sweet to use. No-one trusts BlackBerry any more, and the Priv was an over-priced mistake. Windows Phone history has for the most part been a dog's breakfast. I have a Palm Treo Pro here from 2008. It was operated by poking the tiny screen with a stick. At least we've moved away from that. Of the current epoch; Microsoft have completely decimated consumer faith in their phone OS; Windows 10 upgrades which don't arrive, the 'app-gap' which just gets bigger by the day, and the crazy notion that if we all hang on just a little longer, things will be Better Tomorrow. The Lumias (and the Blu) phones on Windows 8 are excellent in almost every way, even the tiny Lumia 435 ( £55 from Sainsburies) is sweet and powerful. But it's not what people want. The tail of this story is that, after a radical overhaul of what I do with with my phone; check emails, use Skype, send texts and make phone calls, Windows Phone 8 offers more stability, less background data use, and less PAYG mobile-data expense than either BB10 or Android. So I have an excellent dual-sim £60 Blu Windows JR LTE, on WP8.2 which gives a three day battery life. The joke that the Windows Phone is for people who don't need a smartphone is quite true. I'm a low -end user. My friends think Windows phone is for grannies, but they're paying £300 - £400 a year for their contract smartphones. You pays your money, you takes your choice. WP8.2 (Denim) is a pretty sweet place to be, and there's no Google data-mining. That's the real benefit. The downside is that if you switch off social networking, and stop taking photos of yourself, your food, and your privates, nobody hangs out with you. So people buy the phones which enable that. Windows Phone is just too 'adult.' Perfect for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 74
|
Quote:
Also a Querty layout, which is absolutely pointless when it's impossible to touch-type two handed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,590
|
Quote:
Total waste of time for all but smartphone users who really aren't in the need of a smartphone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,040
|
I don't have a smartphone but if/when I eventually get one, it will be a Lumia (if they are still being produced
.Having had negative experiences with Apple/iOS and Google/Android, Windows is the best option, for me. The lack of apps wouldn't matter as I don't have a single app installed on my existing tablets. Reading the news, using Wikipedia, checking timetables, booking tickets and having the possibility to have tickets and boarding cards sent to my phone (something that's not possible with my non-smartphone) are really the only functions I need. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,018
|
Quote:
Does that mean that those 72 app type thingies I have on my Windows phone don't give it any added smarts?
![]() All I know is that I've got 6 Windows Phones and don't use any of them (well, the 1020 for photos every now and then) because all the key apps I use are not available. If that changes, maybe I'll reconsider as I do like the OS itself. Frankly, I can't see that happening. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckingham
Posts: 28,590
|
Just for comparison there are only nine apps I use which are available only on my Android tablet and six of those are TV catch up services which are better viewed on the larger screened device anyway,
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,018
|
The Lumia 1520 should be an awesome media player, but unless you're sideloading content there's only really Netflix and a few others (iPlayer). No Sky Go, Now TV, Amazon and very few third party media players that manage streaming well.
It's such a shame as you've got a great Full-HD screen, but hardly anything to take advantage of it. Android and iOS is swamped for choice. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,921
|
So sad, so very sad.
Will Microsoft continue with the platform when they are selling so few? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,018
|
Quote:
So sad, so very sad.
Will Microsoft continue with the platform when they are selling so few? A lot of the 'blame' can be put on developers for showing little interest, almost contempt, for the platform but these days few developers can afford to cover everything - so on that basis, nothing is going to change. Now sales are even lower there's even less incentive, and we all know that if Microsoft pays for a few official apps, all that happens is you get those official apps - and even then, there's no guarantee of regular support and future updates. So many other OSes have looked great but will never get supported. Lord knows enough people have tried. Maemo/Meego, Bada, webOS, Palm OS, Sailfish, Firefox OS or whatever it was called... The list goes on. |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,645
|
Palm OS actually was successful fpr a long time though, it just died because of a lack of innovation in the face of Windows Mobile and then the iPhone era. It's in the same boat as Symbian.
I can see WP occupying the sort of space that Series 40 does today - very cheap phones. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 5,100
|
Quote:
That's the million dollar question. For years the argument has been yes, in that Microsoft can afford to sit out out and play the long game - but regardless of whether it can afford to carry on, sooner or later someone must stop and reconsider.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 636
|
Quote:
...
I think the quote that Windows Phone is good for people who don't need a smartphone is pretty apt; even though Android is a data-sucking mess, it gives people the apps they want. ... I've no experience of W10 on a mobile, but like many others I've admired the clean Windows Phone interface, but I'm an Android user now, in part because of the app gap. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,018
|
Quote:
Palm OS actually was successful fpr a long time though, it just died because of a lack of innovation in the face of Windows Mobile and then the iPhone era. It's in the same boat as Symbian.
I can see WP occupying the sort of space that Series 40 does today - very cheap phones. When Palm went with Windows Mobile and non standard screen sizes (300x300 pixels or whatever it was) it became even worse. Even many WM apps didn't work! Now it's all about apps, the time to create a wonderful new OS is pretty much over. It could be wonderful but still won't get any traction. |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 10,449
|
I think MS are still sticking with Windows Phone because they want Windows 10 to be a unified PC/tablet/phone OS, and if they give up on phone it will hurt the whole OS. Personally I like being able to have the exact same apps on phone, tablet and PC. I run the Metro official Twitter app in the corner of one of my monitors on my PC, far neater than keeping a Chrome window open for just Twitter, for example.
I'm lucky that my bank TSB has an official Windows app, but there are many official apps lacking. I can understand people like Youtube not making an official app since Google is behind Android and doesn't want a rival to succeed, and only makes iPhone apps because they are forced to by the size of the Apple market. But unofficial Youtube apps are actually better in many ways, like being able to download and save videos of offline viewing, which the official Youtube app on Android won't let you do. So just because there isn't an official app doesn't mean there isn't an alternative. But MS need to do something, and their advertising sucks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,018
|
I know a lot about 'alternative' apps. When I did work for Microsoft, a whole section of their internal guides was dedicated to apps that weren't official - and using them to convince people that they were just as good.
We did printed guides, online guides and even a mobile app. And look where it got Microsoft... |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sandy Heath, Beds. UK
Posts: 10,383
|
Microsoft shot themselves in the foot again. Everyone was waiting for Windows 10 Phone devices, so wouldn't buy the 'old' models.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,515
|
Quote:
That's the million dollar question. For years the argument has been yes, in that Microsoft can afford to sit out out and play the long game - but regardless of whether it can afford to carry on, sooner or later someone must stop and reconsider.
A lot of the 'blame' can be put on developers for showing little interest, almost contempt, for the platform but these days few developers can afford to cover everything - so on that basis, nothing is going to change. Now sales are even lower there's even less incentive, and we all know that if Microsoft pays for a few official apps, all that happens is you get those official apps - and even then, there's no guarantee of regular support and future updates. So many other OSes have looked great but will never get supported. Lord knows enough people have tried. Maemo/Meego, Bada, webOS, Palm OS, Sailfish, Firefox OS or whatever it was called... The list goes on. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Univer...#Compatibility |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TheEssexSunshineCoast Clacton
Posts: 15,220
|
the 950 looks a very nice phone but no way paying out £30 a month for that
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Inactive Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 3,040
|
They finally fixed all the bugs with 8.1. but then we have to start all over again with buggy 10.
Now you've got to choose whether to stick with stable 8.1. with no new apps coming or buggy 10 with doesn't work with a lot of older apps. It's a mess and I think it's over, Android won even though that's far from perfect too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: a land filled with trolls
Posts: 12,018
|
The OS is not really important these days (to most people). It's about apps and access to content.
It's very much iOS and Android now. |
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:55.




