DS Forums

 
 

Your opinion of the new companion, Bill


View Poll Results: First impressions of the new companion, Bill
Positive 35 16.83%
Neutral 32 15.38%
Negative 62 29.81%
None: I will see more before forming an opinion 79 37.98%
Voters: 208. You can't vote on this poll right now - are you signed in?

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24-04-2016, 17:52
broadshoulder
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 12,348
When are we going to depart from the 'modern day gobby female' stereotype?
This

Why not just write the companion normally. Mind you, she has to be a better companion then Clara Oswald
broadshoulder is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 24-04-2016, 19:29
Tom Tit
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,454
From the clip she seems to be a typical Moffat companion and I wouldn't expect anything different. I know without even reading the comments that that very fact is going to intensely irritate some people but it's the way things will continue to be. There isn't going to be a quiet, subordinate, 'secretary' like companion again for the reason that this isn't the 1960s.

I also know some won't like her because she is black (although they will try to disguise the reasoning), seemingly working class (but they will say 'chavvy' instead, again to disguise the prejudice), and not a typical 'looker'. Well, there you go. They will be minorities although they'll shout loudly and shrilly. I thought the clip was entertaining and I have confidence in their casting. There hasn't been a companion who hasn't worked yet.

If there's one element I don't like so far it's the name 'Bill'. Cynically, it seems to be an attempt to sub-consciously evoke Billie Piper in people's minds maybe? IT certainly does for me.
Tom Tit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2016, 19:53
Corwin
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,601

If there's one element I don't like so far it's the name 'Bill'. Cynically, it seems to be an attempt to sub-consciously evoke Billie Piper in people's minds maybe? IT certainly does for me.
If Moffat wanted to continue the trend of naming companions after former companion actresses (Clara was Elisabeth Sladen's middle name) he could have called her Paul which is Billie Piper's middle name.


Far more likely though is the character is called Belinda or Wilhelmina both of which can be shortened to Bill.
Corwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2016, 21:17
Stig
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sandy Heath, Beds. UK
Posts: 10,377
It just watched the clip again, and it's not so bad!
Stig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-04-2016, 22:46
POTD
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 554
The clip was so so, personally I prefer the character reveal to be more natural. By all means have the publicity launch for the ACTOR, but the character should emerge organically from the drama. Having Daleks is a bit of a cliche, and the dialogue seemeda bit like something Moff would knock out in his sleep for Comic Relief or CiN.

From the tiny clip, her personality is a bit different than Clara's when she first appeared. While Clara would occasionally tease 11, when it came to monsters she showed genuine fear and ALWAYS listened to the Doctor. Bill to me seems more naive.
POTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 00:46
Grand Dizzy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,132
My reaction (based on this) was positive. She reminds me slightly of Martha, who was my favourite regular companion of recent years.

She came across as down-to-earth, easy-going, and having a sense of humour, yet seemed to know her place, being respectful of the Doctor (who deserves to be respected by everyone, especially humans who have been graciously chosen to help him). There has not been much in the way of femininity on Doctor Who lately, but from what I can tell this lady seems like just a normal, feminine woman. (Apart from the horrific name "Bill"!)

The reason I disliked Clara and Amy was that they were unpleasant, bossy, cocky, angry, stuck-up, whiny, insolent, aggressive, dominant females who regularly mouthed-off at the Doctor, and to make them seem even worse they were paired up with quiet, submissive boyfriends (ie Danny and Rory).

Whether or not "Bill" is finally the companion I've been waiting for, I would like to hope that the Doctor will one day find some pleasant, respectful, loyal, obedient people to travel with, so the stories can be more about him and not about the outbursts of his know-it-all companions.

I must admit I don't really watch Doctor Who much any more and I generally tend to watch more old TV shows these days because something truly horrible has happened to all the women in modern TV shows in the last 20 years or so. They have all become like men: tough, independent and strong-willed. It is very sad. I would love to see a new female companion who was soft, quiet, dependent and submissive. I doubt I will though. We'll probably only see male characters like that.
Grand Dizzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 00:53
Brandon_Smith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,295
I Loooveed Martha her and Donna were the best, but she gave me no Martha vibes
Brandon_Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 00:54
tiggerpooh
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: 100 Acre Wood
Posts: 4,110
I voted ‘None’. I shall be reserving my judgement until after Pearl’s first DW episode in 2017.

Besides, you can hardly give your opinion if you’ve only seen the person for less than ten minutes, can you?
tiggerpooh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 01:27
Sam_Gee1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 697
I voted ‘None’. I shall be reserving my judgement until after Pearl’s first DW episode in 2017.

Besides, you can hardly give your opinion if you’ve only seen the person for less than ten minutes, can you?
Trust me, the fickle will and have already.
Sam_Gee1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 06:21
Brandon_Smith
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,295
I voted ‘None’. I shall be reserving my judgement until after Pearl’s first DW episode in 2017.

Besides, you can hardly give your opinion if you’ve only seen the person for less than ten minutes, can you?
Lets be honest, it dosen't work that way for most people me included. I have a negative opinion of her so far.
Brandon_Smith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 06:35
Stig
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sandy Heath, Beds. UK
Posts: 10,377
I voted ‘None’. I shall be reserving my judgement until after Pearl’s first DW episode in 2017.

Besides, you can hardly give your opinion if you’ve only seen the person for less than ten minutes, can you?
The clue is in the phrase 'first impressions' which are formed within a minute or so.
Stig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 07:18
CAMERA OBSCURA
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,692
I'm not sure the 'clip' was the best way to introduce a new companion...well, the clip we were presented with at least that is. It wasn't very good imo. One too many questions/wise cracks asked considering the peril of the situation made the character a little gobby for a one off introduction clip (It might be part of something bigger I dont know, she might not be able to grasp situations, she might be a bleedin robot for all we know)

I had to watch it a few times but have no complaints with the actress. Good luck to her.
CAMERA OBSCURA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 09:23
Irma Bunt
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,813
But as I already said, I don't know about the character yet, I was just commenting on Mackie as a person that she seems lovely, and I'm often as interested in the actors themselves as much as the characters they play. I really don't understand what's bothering you so much you're trying to pick apart my comment...?
You made a perfectly valid point, and then were cross examined as though you in the dock in some big murder trial. Such is DS.

I'd just rise above it and ignore it, if I were you. Or just lurk on the boards, which is what I largely do these days.
Irma Bunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 09:33
dave_windows
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,365
She only had a few lines to say but she still managed to come across in those few moments as a dreadful actress.
I agree. This character had lines written that just came across as very thick and stupid something no other companion did.
dave_windows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 09:35
johnnysaucepn
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,651
She came across as down-to-earth, easy-going, and having a sense of humour, yet seemed to know her place, being respectful of the Doctor (who deserves to be respected by everyone, especially humans who have been graciously chosen to help him).
I don't think the Doctor looks at things that way. He doesn't like to be saluted. I think he has always liked a bit of friction from his companions. There have been numerous companions that he's told his 'rules' to, who have then blithely ignored them, and in doing so proved their worth. Sometimes he does it deliberately.

The reason I disliked Clara and Amy was that they were unpleasant, bossy, cocky, angry, stuck-up, whiny, insolent, aggressive, dominant females who regularly mouthed-off at the Doctor, and to make them seem even worse they were paired up with quiet, submissive boyfriends (ie Danny and Rory).
And never lost their femininity for a moment. Femininity is defined by women, not by men's opinion of what women should be. And Danny submissive? The biggest criticism that he drew was that he was a controlling bully. (Which I also think is wrong.)

They have all become like men: tough, independent and strong-willed. It is very sad.
Got news for you - women have always been tough, independent and strong-willed.

I would love to see a new female companion who was soft, quiet, dependent and submissive. I doubt I will though. We'll probably only see male characters like that.
The companion is never going to be quiet and submissive. Because nothing in the episode would ever happen and there would be no point in them even existing.
johnnysaucepn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 10:55
Mulett
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
The most important thing, for me, is that she isn't Clara. Frankly, they could handcuff the Doctor to a dining table and have him drag it around with him for a whole season and I would still find it less tiresome than Clara.

From the clip we saw, Bill seemed a little Sarah Jane Adventures or perhaps even Big Finish companion. But she did seem fun at least.

I just hope Moffat doesn't cock it up as usual with the whole story-arc-instead-of-character approach. But I guess we'll see.
Mulett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 11:16
POTD
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 554
The reason I disliked Clara and Amy was that they were unpleasant, bossy, cocky, angry, stuck-up, whiny, insolent, aggressive, dominant females who regularly mouthed-off at the Doctor, and to make them seem even worse they were paired up with quiet, submissive boyfriends (ie Danny and Rory).
What? What? WHAT? Have I been watching the same show as you for the last 5 years?
POTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 11:42
Michael_Eve
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,080
My reaction (based on this) was positive. She reminds me slightly of Martha, who was my favourite regular companion of recent years.

She came across as down-to-earth, easy-going, and having a sense of humour, yet seemed to know her place, being respectful of the Doctor (who deserves to be respected by everyone, especially humans who have been graciously chosen to help him). There has not been much in the way of femininity on Doctor Who lately, but from what I can tell this lady seems like just a normal, feminine woman. (Apart from the horrific name "Bill"!)

The reason I disliked Clara and Amy was that they were unpleasant, bossy, cocky, angry, stuck-up, whiny, insolent, aggressive, dominant females who regularly mouthed-off at the Doctor, and to make them seem even worse they were paired up with quiet, submissive boyfriends (ie Danny and Rory).

Whether or not "Bill" is finally the companion I've been waiting for, I would like to hope that the Doctor will one day find some pleasant, respectful, loyal, obedient people to travel with, so the stories can be more about him and not about the outbursts of his know-it-all companions.

I must admit I don't really watch Doctor Who much any more and I generally tend to watch more old TV shows these days because something truly horrible has happened to all the women in modern TV shows in the last 20 years or so. They have all become like men: tough, independent and strong-willed. It is very sad. I would love to see a new female companion who was soft, quiet, dependent and submissive. I doubt I will though. We'll probably only see male characters like that.
I'm trying to think of a female companion who fits your criteria from the shows long history, even though I don't share your desire to see someone like that in the show, particularly "submissive." Victoria, maybe? Tbh, your criteria sounds like it would make a pretty wet character, which I think, sorry Deborah, Victoria could be. Susan veered in that direction a bit too, I suppose. But the terrific Barbara Wright set the template way back. Intelligent, resourceful and no walkover. Love her.
Michael_Eve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 12:22
adams66
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 3,703
I'm trying to think of a female companion who fits your criteria from the shows long history, even though I don't share your desire to see someone like that in the show, particularly "submissive." Victoria, maybe? Tbh, your criteria sounds like it would make a pretty wet character, which I think, sorry Deborah, Victoria could be. Susan veered in that direction a bit too, I suppose. But the terrific Barbara Wright set the template way back. Intelligent, resourceful and no walkover. Love her.
She sure did. Wonderful character. And she could really rock a cardy!
adams66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 12:23
Straker
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 37,019
You made a perfectly valid point, and then were cross examined as though you in the dock in some big murder trial. Such is DS.
If it'd been a valid point it wouldn't have been contradictory.

Some/many Who fans don't want to say anything critical of the show, ever and that's manifesting itself again here over this. It's my impression they're slightly annoyed that others are not hamstrung by an obsessive fealty to the programme no matter how wretched it becomes and can comment on it without fear or favour.
Straker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 12:33
Lord Smexy
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,506
If it'd been a valid point it wouldn't have been contradictory.

Some/many Who fans don't want to say anything critical of the show, ever and that's manifesting itself again here over this. It's my impression they're slightly annoyed that others are not hamstrung by an obsessive fealty to the programme no matter how wretched it becomes and can comment on it without fear or favour.
Oh dear, where are you getting this from? Am I not allowed to say I liked how Pearl Mackie came across without it turning into a meaningless slate at how obsessed some of us are with the show? Would you have been happier if I decided I despise the women and will never watch the show again?
Lord Smexy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 12:36
Mulett
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
If it'd been a valid point it wouldn't have been contradictory. Some/many Who fans don't want to say anything critical of the show, ever and that's manifesting itself again here over this. It's my impression they're slightly annoyed that others are not hamstrung by an obsessive fealty to the programme no matter how wretched it becomes and can comment on it without fear or favour.
I'm not sure I agree with your point but, I must say, you do write beautifully.
Mulett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 12:46
Michael_Eve
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 6,080
If it'd been a valid point it wouldn't have been contradictory.

Some/many Who fans don't want to say anything critical of the show, ever and that's manifesting itself again here over this. It's my impression they're slightly annoyed that others are not hamstrung by an obsessive fealty to the programme no matter how wretched it becomes and can comment on it without fear or favour.
Sorry, but I think that's complete ballcocks, especially when it comes to DS! Your perception so fair enough...just don't recognise this forum from your description at all. Certainly a general absence of best. Episode. EVAH. Syndrome in these parts with the comments,Ed. Well, from my perception, anyway. If you don't like the show, any sort of praise might rankle, maybe? You see things through your own prism of 'reality'?

Mr Dalliard! I've started speaking pretentious guff!

(Aimed at myself there, btw!)
Michael_Eve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 13:12
Mulett
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,406
If Saturday's teaser trailer was titled 'A Friend from the Future', does that mean Pearl Mackie's Bill is from the future?
Mulett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-04-2016, 13:21
GDK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,881
There's no right or wrong opinion when it comes to subjective matters (like whether a TV show is good or bad, for example). There is only your own personal opinion and whether others agree with it or not.

If others disagree, that's perfectly OK and a subject for interesting discussion.

If others like what you dislike it doesn't necessarily mean that they're biased or are uncritical. And posting a differing opinion isn't necessarily "shouting down" the opinions of others.
GDK is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:12.