Originally Posted by Abomination:
“I try to avoid thinking about things in this way too much.
I loved Buffy when it was on TV, was sad to see it go when it did - as much as it got a decent ending. I was never much interested in comics but then I heard the tv story was continued in them and I decided to find out more... no longer constrained by a TV budget the possibilities were surely endless. What I found though was shocking... they turned Buffy's sister into a giant, and then a centaur... you don't need to even watch the show to know how bizarre that sounds. As someone who did watch it, it was just insulting to the shows own integrity. Every plotline seemed to involve a character from years earlier - now they didn't need to try and get back actors for it they could do whatever the hell they wanted. It was like the power went to the writers heads, and the whole thing failed to carve out its own essence whilst also failing to emulate that of the show it was based on. There was so much potential in what could have been done, and it wasn't realised... the main reason actually being because anyone who was anyone that was involved failed to excercise restraint.
I could say the same for Torchwood. RTD and Chris Chibnall collectively thought that it'd be a good idea to promote a 'grown up sci-fi show' by having a sex alien in the second episode? It could have amounted to so much more at that stage, whereas I would argue the show peaked when it only had five episodes and a diminished main cast to work with (namely Children of Earth). When there was a sense of restraint.
Recognising that the BBC doesn't have a whole load of budget to chuck at a spin-off, I'll admit I was just frankly surprised that one was cropping up at all - not many shows get confirmed spin-offs when they're airing their ninth series, especially sci-fi shows. If Class can have a bit of an edge like the best of Torchwood, and a bit of the heart of the best of The Sarah Jane Adventures I actually think it could almost come across as a rather decent merging of the two concepts into something decent of its own. It's set in a school in London and therefore isn't going to be Doctor Who itself... but if it can carve out its own essence then all the power to it. I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt, especially given Capaldi is involved albeit to a small degree too.”
“I try to avoid thinking about things in this way too much.
I loved Buffy when it was on TV, was sad to see it go when it did - as much as it got a decent ending. I was never much interested in comics but then I heard the tv story was continued in them and I decided to find out more... no longer constrained by a TV budget the possibilities were surely endless. What I found though was shocking... they turned Buffy's sister into a giant, and then a centaur... you don't need to even watch the show to know how bizarre that sounds. As someone who did watch it, it was just insulting to the shows own integrity. Every plotline seemed to involve a character from years earlier - now they didn't need to try and get back actors for it they could do whatever the hell they wanted. It was like the power went to the writers heads, and the whole thing failed to carve out its own essence whilst also failing to emulate that of the show it was based on. There was so much potential in what could have been done, and it wasn't realised... the main reason actually being because anyone who was anyone that was involved failed to excercise restraint.
I could say the same for Torchwood. RTD and Chris Chibnall collectively thought that it'd be a good idea to promote a 'grown up sci-fi show' by having a sex alien in the second episode? It could have amounted to so much more at that stage, whereas I would argue the show peaked when it only had five episodes and a diminished main cast to work with (namely Children of Earth). When there was a sense of restraint.
Recognising that the BBC doesn't have a whole load of budget to chuck at a spin-off, I'll admit I was just frankly surprised that one was cropping up at all - not many shows get confirmed spin-offs when they're airing their ninth series, especially sci-fi shows. If Class can have a bit of an edge like the best of Torchwood, and a bit of the heart of the best of The Sarah Jane Adventures I actually think it could almost come across as a rather decent merging of the two concepts into something decent of its own. It's set in a school in London and therefore isn't going to be Doctor Who itself... but if it can carve out its own essence then all the power to it. I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt, especially given Capaldi is involved albeit to a small degree too.”
I personally really liked Torchwood throughout. Did it seem as though in it's first few episodes that it was trying to force sexual stuff for the sake of it? admittedly yes, but I'd say that was just early wrangling with trying to get the tone right, which they then did, and I think I'm in a minority on this forum, but I think of series 1 and 2 as quality just as I do with children of earth, and the very fact that they were deemed good enough to then commission a big prime time five night event tv third series off the back of, shows that they must have done well at the time.
My problem with Class is with it's concept. Even before anyone's seen it, how enticing exactly does a show set in a school sound? not very to me, and as such I think that puts it at a disadvantage for people to even give it a try, so whether it's good quality or not, people might even give it that chance to find out.
Compare that with torchwood, and before we'd even seen it, we knew the concept was a well known doctor who character, running a branch of an organization that was just featured in the last major story arc of the main series. It practically screamed doctor who spin off as much as was possible.



