|
||||||||
100% ALLEGED Showbiz, Blind Items and Gossip Thread (Part 5) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#226 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 273
|
From this weeks Popbitch
Which frog-faced impresario and noted hater of the poor is hatching plans to spawn further? He has had his sperm frozen at a London clinic. I |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#227 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 12,779
|
This isn't really my normal area, but a couple of thoughts on the 'big story' in the papers at the moment...
A lot of it revolves around how he presents himself as a family man, and uses his family to promote himself etc. I don't really see that side of him, or is it a reference to his most famous role ? Generally speaking, though, there really is no public interest here, is there ? Apart from people liking to have a giggle at him paying to have things shoved up his bum, there really is nothing more serious to it and really should be private. Even if you pay a prostitute, there should be an expectation that it is a confidential transaction. |
|
|
|
|
|
#228 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 264
|
Quote:
This isn't really my normal area, but a couple of thoughts on the 'big story' in the papers at the moment...
A lot of it revolves around how he presents himself as a family man, and uses his family to promote himself etc. I don't really see that side of him, or is it a reference to his most famous role ? Generally speaking, though, there really is no public interest here, is there ? Apart from people liking to have a giggle at him paying to have things shoved up his bum, there really is nothing more serious to it and really should be private. Even if you pay a prostitute, there should be an expectation that it is a confidential transaction. People involved in such transactions should be allowed to tell their side of the story, I suppose it is different if both parties want to keep it quiet. I would not like the situation where rich and powerful people can buy privacy to cover up embarrassments. The public decide if it is news worthy by buying the publication or not. Nothing worse than the establishment deciding what we can and cannot read about, especially when other members if the public elsewhere are free to do so. |
|
|
|
|
|
#229 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,034
|
I wouldn't like to be in the paper for some silly thing I don't think its right
|
|
|
|
|
|
#230 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 264
|
Quote:
I wouldn't like to be in the paper for some silly thing I don't think its right
Even if you did, chances are it would not be printed as nobody is interested in reading about us plebs, we want to read about celebs and what they are like behind closed doors behind the PR spin. There is a thread on here about famous people and what they are really like to those who have met them, we have this showbiz gossip thread where we speculate and another thread about the sexulaity of stars. No difference in that and a story in a paper really. Everyone should have the right to tell their side of the story. An editor will decide if it worth printing and the public will decide if they want to pay and read it. The person concerned will decide of it is libellous and if to sue. That's life |
|
|
|
|
|
#231 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,034
|
Quote:
You don't have to read it though. Don't do wrong and chances you won't be in there. Don't go asking strange ladies to stick things up your bottom.
Even if you did, chances are it would not be printed as nobody is interested in reading about us plebs, we want to read about celebs and what they are like behind closed doors behind the PR spin. There is a thread on here about famous people and what they are really like to those who have met them, we have this showbiz gossip thread where we speculate and another thread about the sexulaity of stars. No difference in that and a story in a paper really. Everyone should have the right to tell their side of the story. An editor will decide if it worth printing and the public will decide if they want to pay and read it. The person concerned will decide of it is libellous and if to sue. That's life Why shouldnt I be allowed to have a lady put something up my bum in privacy? Is no one entitled to a private life? |
|
|
|
|
|
#232 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central London
Posts: 43,686
|
Quote:
You don't have to read it though. Don't do wrong and chances you won't be in there. Don't go asking strange ladies to stick things up your bottom.
Even if you did, chances are it would not be printed as nobody is interested in reading about us plebs, we want to read about celebs and what they are like behind closed doors behind the PR spin. There is a thread on here about famous people and what they are really like to those who have met them, we have this showbiz gossip thread where we speculate and another thread about the sexulaity of stars. No difference in that and a story in a paper really. Everyone should have the right to tell their side of the story. An editor will decide if it worth printing and the public will decide if they want to pay and read it. The person concerned will decide of it is libellous and if to sue. That's life |
|
|
|
|
#233 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,224
|
Quote:
But does that not beg the very serious question of why what an actor has done with a hooker an actor who is not using his status to promote the sanctity of marriage and fidelity etc etc is deemed in the public interest and why a government minister who was in a positon to make very big changes in the media when he was seeing prostitutes and a porn star and being indiscreet with government papers is deemed to be entitled to a private life and the stories not in the public interest ? I think we all know why and it is not only unfair it is to my mind corrupt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#234 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 26
|
Quote:
Why on earth would there be? The lead's "press issues" have been well known for years. I doubt anyone at Chichester gives a damn.
However, sometime in the very near future it's going to be front-page news when it all comes out in Britain. Is the producer of the play going to think that the adverse news will affect the performance/reputation/takings? Only time will tell. BTW did anyone read TMS on page 11 of The Times today? Someone is bursting to be able to say "I dropped you all a hint" in the future
|
|
|
|
|
|
#235 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NW England
Posts: 9,647
|
The press are behaving like spoilt brats......we want to tell you something juicy but we can't.....we love wrecking people's reputations......but a nasty judge won't let us.....
Kiss and tells were big in the 1980s and 1990s......but they are so tiresome now..... If people want to know they can Google it very easily, there is no need for the UK press to make cash from someone else's private life...... |
|
|
|
|
|
#236 |
![]() Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 12,567
|
A reminder that anyone giving overly obvious "hints", soliciting PMs for reveals or outright posting names of those under injunctions will have their posting privileges revoked. Don't do it.
|
|
|
|
|
#237 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 38
|
Quote:
I think you're quite right in that the good people of Chichester could care less.
However, sometime in the very near future it's going to be front-page news when it all comes out in Britain. Is the producer of the play going to think that the adverse news will affect the performance/reputation/takings? Only time will tell. BTW did anyone read TMS on page 11 of The Times today? Someone is bursting to be able to say "I dropped you all a hint" in the future ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#238 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,432
|
From CDAN:
Kindness Blind This B- mostly television actress wife of an A+ mostly movie actor did something very sweet. Two women were ahead of her in line at a toy store and were paying with cash. They were digging around in their purses and wallets because they were like $2 short on about a $200 purchase. Our actress pulled out a credit card and insisted she pay for the whole thing. Not just the $2. The entire purchase. |
|
|
|
|
|
#239 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,279
|
Quote:
From CDAN:
Kindness Blind This B- mostly television actress wife of an A+ mostly movie actor did something very sweet. Two women were ahead of her in line at a toy store and were paying with cash. They were digging around in their purses and wallets because they were like $2 short on about a $200 purchase. Our actress pulled out a credit card and insisted she pay for the whole thing. Not just the $2. The entire purchase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#240 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,432
|
Quote:
From CDAN:
Kindness Blind This B- mostly television actress wife of an A+ mostly movie actor did something very sweet. Two women were ahead of her in line at a toy store and were paying with cash. They were digging around in their purses and wallets because they were like $2 short on about a $200 purchase. Our actress pulled out a credit card and insisted she pay for the whole thing. Not just the $2. The entire purchase. |
|
|
|
|
|
#241 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 264
|
Quote:
The press are behaving like spoilt brats......we want to tell you something juicy but we can't.....we love wrecking people's reputations......but a nasty judge won't let us.....
Kiss and tells were big in the 1980s and 1990s......but they are so tiresome now..... If people want to know they can Google it very easily, there is no need for the UK press to make cash from someone else's private life...... Is it right the courts can threaten someone with jail for telling the truth / their side of the story, just because some who is powerful, has money, or Both, can buy privacy at the courts. I would rather support free speech rather than supporting the gagging of the press. Don't like it, don't buy it, thepublic decides, why should a court dictate what we can and cannot read? Madness when people living in other countries can. |
|
|
|
|
|
#242 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 264
|
Who was the 'celebrity female figure of trust' who had an injunction granted last May over an affair with a 'very high profile married lover'
Trusted is a strange one to use, you think politician's but celebrity is used. Newsreader, talk show host? I think of the strictly participant and ex bbc morning presenter. Did she split with her husband last year and famously flirted in an interview with golden balls? |
|
|
|
|
|
#243 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,352
|
Quote:
A general question about some of these super injunctions... the stories have been printed in various US tabloid magazines, often The National Enquirer, which are readily available in UK newsagents... what happens in these cases? Are the editions featuring these stories banned from being sold in the UK, or just physically printed in the UK? Do they produce a UK version of the print with the story removed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#244 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,352
|
Quote:
If true, I would tell the child now. He could have a relationship with the real father.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#245 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Belfast
Posts: 3,409
|
Quote:
From CDAN:
Kindness Blind This B- mostly television actress wife of an A+ mostly movie actor did something very sweet. Two women were ahead of her in line at a toy store and were paying with cash. They were digging around in their purses and wallets because they were like $2 short on about a $200 purchase. Our actress pulled out a credit card and insisted she pay for the whole thing. Not just the $2. The entire purchase. |
|
|
|
|
|
#246 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 13,996
|
Quote:
I never believed the wife's story that she drove around and came back and slept in the car. Sure to be more than being gay or depression. Who would take out an injunction for that. Won't be surprised she was cheating and he found out. Rumours are his parents know the truth and put up with her for sake of their grandchildren.
Quote:
His depression was very well documented, nothing new. I don't think he was gay.
I think the injunction was to stop the media digging and finding out more about her. Quote:
If true, I would tell the child now. He could have a relationship with the real father.
Would explain his long time depression. Coroner ruled that not enough evidence to rule that he took his own life. ![]() Quote:
What if the real father doesn't want to know? More heartache for the poor kid.
I certainly don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#247 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,432
|
Quote:
From this weeks Popbitch
Which frog-faced impresario and noted hater of the poor is hatching plans to spawn further? He has had his sperm frozen at a London clinic. |
|
|
|
|
|
#248 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Council Estate
Posts: 35,535
|
Quote:
The new Batman's ex who he still lives with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#249 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,146
|
Quote:
What?? They still live together?? Colour me surprised but the story checks out
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#250 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Council Estate
Posts: 35,535
|
Quote:
With a big house and small children it's practical. Particularly given the nature of their work - odd hours, travel.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:58.






