DS Forums

 
 

100% ALLEGED Showbiz, Blind Items and Gossip Thread (Part 5)


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22-05-2016, 18:40
BodyElectric
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 482
He's a DJ that's just been in a car accident and she's a US singer who is fast.
Thank you! I've got it now.
BodyElectric is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 22-05-2016, 20:13
dave_windows
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,362
Oh yeah like Elijah Wood would ******* know. Hes american for christ sake.
dave_windows is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22-05-2016, 20:35
SirMickTravis
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,224
Oh yeah like Elijah Wood would ******* know. Hes american for christ sake.
Have you walked in from a different conversation.
SirMickTravis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-05-2016, 21:33
Ads
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Pimlico, central London, UK
Posts: 14,872
Any ideas of the married former world champion, now retired, boxer who met a prostitute and asked for cocaine? There is currently an injunction preventing this story being publiched in England And Wales.

Another example of the rich manipulating the ridiculous UK laws
Completely. I am very nervous that unelected judges are in effect becoming censors.
Ads is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-05-2016, 22:42
skp20040
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central London
Posts: 43,686
Completely. I am very nervous that unelected judges are in effect becoming censors.
The same unelected judges who advise juries and pass sentences, or would you prefer The Sun to get to decide that as well ? based on who they want to bring down at the time
skp20040 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 22-05-2016, 23:09
Fiery Phoenix
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 264
The same unelected judges who advise juries and pass sentences, or would you prefer The Sun to get to decide that as well ? based on who they want to bring down at the time
The Sun gets my vote everytime.

Judges should not decide what is in the public's interest to read and not read. It is state censorship. Would you have the same opinion if they were to gag forums such as this? Or is it simply anti Murdoch sentiment that you base your opinions on?
Fiery Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-05-2016, 23:43
skp20040
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central London
Posts: 43,686
The Sun gets my vote everytime.

Judges should not decide what is in the public's interest to read and not read. It is state censorship. Would you have the same opinion if they were to gag forums such as this? Or is it simply anti Murdoch sentiment that you base your opinions on?

The fact that you favour The Sun over the judiciary is something I will leave you to live with.

My issue is with people like Murdoch but not just him , who sit and decide when to build someone up and then when to take them down, and my issue in this case is that the story is not in the public interest at all, Whittingdale was and they supressed it hoping for favours in return. And also in this case the paper telling us and the judiciary it is in the public interest has wanted revenge for a long time, that is not journalism. My sentiment is not anti Murdoch it is anti tabloid bullshit.
skp20040 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2016, 06:43
Sarah777
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,788
The fact that you favour The Sun over the judiciary is something I will leave you to live with.

My issue is with people like Murdoch but not just him , who sit and decide when to build someone up and then when to take them down, and my issue in this case is that the story is not in the public interest at all, Whittingdale was and they supressed it hoping for favours in return. And also in this case the paper telling us and the judiciary it is in the public interest has wanted revenge for a long time, that is not journalism. My sentiment is not anti Murdoch it is anti tabloid bullshit.

Totally agree with this. I think some of these injunctions are really ridiculous, but media who had buried the Whittingdale story for their own benefit, can't say what is in the best interest of the public.
Sarah777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2016, 08:34
ftv
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,434
Totally agree with this. I think some of these injunctions are really ridiculous, but media who had buried the Whittingdale story for their own benefit, can't say what is in the best interest of the public.
The BBC broke the Whittingdale story and the papers followed.The papers weren't bothered about what was in the public interest they were concerned about what was in their interest and feared some sort of retribution from Whittingdale.I doubt anyone outside the UK had ever heard of Whittingdale. In fact he was a single man having a relationship (perhaps an unorthodox one) with a single woman.
ftv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2016, 09:06
donna255
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Belfast
Posts: 3,409
From CDAN:

I give the "relationship" another week between this foreign born celebrity and A+ list singer. Maybe two weeks if they try and spin things or if she can't get the details quickly enough, but what happened last night is going to open a whole bunch of boxes.
I know everyone is going with Car Crash DJ and Shake It Off.

But my thinking is going with Mimi and her Aussie Cricket promoter millionaire. His family really hate her it seems and has she been flashing the engagement ring recently?
donna255 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2016, 09:37
AdelaideGirl
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,146
I know everyone is going with Car Crash DJ and Shake It Off.

But my thinking is going with Mimi and her Aussie Cricket promoter millionaire. His family really hate her it seems and has she been flashing the engagement ring recently?
Emancipate Mimi! You are too good for him. Not sure that flashing her assets counts as a big deal these days.
AdelaideGirl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2016, 12:16
mvloca
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 409
I know everyone is going with Car Crash DJ and Shake It Off.

But my thinking is going with Mimi and her Aussie Cricket promoter millionaire. His family really hate her it seems and has she been flashing the engagement ring recently?
Not sure if you're right either but the majority consensus on Shake It Off doesn't ring true. He's more than a celebrity to be sure, he's done quite well in the US and worked with most of the biggest names, calling him a "celeb" just doesn't add up
mvloca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2016, 12:43
Fiery Phoenix
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 264
Regarding those who must not be named - interesting article by Kelvin Mackenzie in today's Sun - a lot of people who do not usually agree with him are supporting the comments in his column today - after a certain Sharon Osbourne raised it up again.
Fiery Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2016, 13:40
Abriel
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,164
Regarding those who must not be named - interesting article by Kelvin Mackenzie in today's Sun - a lot of people who do not usually agree with him are supporting the comments in his column today - after a certain Sharon Osbourne raised it up again.
I noticed the Sun had an exclusive with the Rocketman this week, all about his fabulous husband and kids. Coincidence?
Abriel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2016, 14:02
Fiery Phoenix
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 264
I noticed the Sun had an exclusive with the Rocketman this week, all about his fabulous husband and kids. Coincidence?
Actually Kelvin's column was not about Rocketman, but rather parents of a missing child.

I read the interview with Rocketman, he was singing the praises of the press in the UK, saying he would rather be here than in the USA
Fiery Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2016, 14:22
dave2702
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Offenburg, Germany
Posts: 1,351
From CDAN:

This former A list rapper with a name that looks like it could be German has a boyfriend. The deeply closeted rapper says the guy is a bodyguard, but bodyguards don't usually share their employer's bed.
Didn't Ex of Rose from a Kiss become overly familiar with her bodyguard ?
dave2702 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2016, 14:26
skp20040
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central London
Posts: 43,686
The BBC broke the Whittingdale story and the papers followed.The papers weren't bothered about what was in the public interest they were concerned about what was in their interest and feared some sort of retribution from Whittingdale.I doubt anyone outside the UK had ever heard of Whittingdale. In fact he was a single man having a relationship (perhaps an unorthodox one) with a single woman.
But as we know there was more damaging stuff which came out in the next story and as Frank Carson used to say in his Irish accent " come here there's more"
skp20040 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2016, 16:01
dee123
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 22,432
Didn't Ex of Rose from a Kiss become overly familiar with her bodyguard ?
Yes. I think.
dee123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2016, 16:42
sorcha_healy27
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 68,922
Didn't Ex of Rose from a Kiss become overly familiar with her bodyguard ?
I took that blind to mean a male rapper.
sorcha_healy27 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2016, 22:54
Leicester_Hunk
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Leicester!!!
Posts: 13,032
I'm not famous so I can misbehave. I slept with my wife last night and she knows I'm sleeping with my friend with benefits tonight.

I don't care who knows.

Publish and be damned.
But why bother being married? Don't get it.
Leicester_Hunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2016, 00:03
skp20040
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central London
Posts: 43,686
But why bother being married? Don't get it.
Some people have open marriages / relationships, it doesn't work for all but it will for some and as long as the couples are happy with it .
skp20040 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2016, 09:32
codeblue
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: A Sound Expert
Posts: 13,881
Some people have open marriages / relationships, it doesn't work for all but it will for some and as long as the couples are happy with it .
The injunction is there, not because of the nature of an open marriage, but because of the hypocricy. They practice one thing but preach another.

This is WHY it is in the public interest, and why they have an injunction.

If i had a foundation or charity, and my lifestyle went against the core beliefs that i preached to others, it would reflect poorly.
codeblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2016, 09:34
latinloulou
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cuddling Nel with Denim&Du-Vay
Posts: 1,672
I took that blind to mean a male rapper.
So did I
latinloulou is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2016, 10:45
davelovesleeds
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leeds
Posts: 10,953
Some people have open marriages / relationships, it doesn't work for all but it will for some and as long as the couples are happy with it .
Exactly that's how it is for us. It works but I know it wouldn't for many others.

I understand the hypocrisy comment, which is why I don't advocate one type of lifestyle while living out another one.
davelovesleeds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-05-2016, 11:09
shirlt9
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,066
Exactly that's how it is for us. It works but I know it wouldn't for many others.

I understand the hypocrisy comment, which is why I don't advocate one type of lifestyle while living out another one.
As long as it works both ways..and its not just one partner having their cake and eating it!!!! and the other partner terrified of them leaving if they dont comply..that would be called disgusting,controlling and extremely unreasonable behaviour and would make the person living the open marriage scum.
shirlt9 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:49.