Thank you! I've got it now.

Oh yeah like Elijah Wood would ******* know. Hes american for christ sake.

Have you walked in from a different conversation.

Completely. I am very nervous that unelected judges are in effect becoming censors.

The same unelected judges who advise juries and pass sentences, or would you prefer The Sun to get to decide that as well ? based on who they want to bring down at the time

The Sun gets my vote everytime.

Judges should not decide what is in the public's interest to read and not read. It is state censorship. Would you have the same opinion if they were to gag forums such as this? Or is it simply anti Murdoch sentiment that you base your opinions on?

The fact that you favour The Sun over the judiciary is something I will leave you to live with.

My issue is with people like Murdoch but not just him , who sit and decide when to build someone up and then when to take them down, and my issue in this case is that the story is not in the public interest at all, Whittingdale was and they supressed it hoping for favours in return. And also in this case the paper telling us and the judiciary it is in the public interest has wanted revenge for a long time, that is not journalism. My sentiment is not anti Murdoch it is anti tabloid bullshit.

Totally agree with this. I think some of these injunctions are really ridiculous, but media who had buried the Whittingdale story for their own benefit, can't say what is in the best interest of the public.

The BBC broke the Whittingdale story and the papers followed.The papers weren't bothered about what was in the public interest they were concerned about what was in their interest and feared some sort of retribution from Whittingdale.I doubt anyone outside the UK had ever heard of Whittingdale. In fact he was a single man having a relationship (perhaps an unorthodox one) with a single woman.

I know everyone is going with Car Crash DJ and Shake It Off.

But my thinking is going with Mimi and her Aussie Cricket promoter millionaire. His family really hate her it seems and has she been flashing the engagement ring recently?

Emancipate Mimi! You are too good for him. Not sure that flashing her assets counts as a big deal these days.

Not sure if you're right either but the majority consensus on Shake It Off doesn't ring true. He's more than a celebrity to be sure, he's done quite well in the US and worked with most of the biggest names, calling him a "celeb" just doesn't add up

Regarding those who must not be named - interesting article by Kelvin Mackenzie in today's Sun - a lot of people who do not usually agree with him are supporting the comments in his column today - after a certain Sharon Osbourne raised it up again.

I noticed the Sun had an exclusive with the Rocketman this week, all about his fabulous husband and kids. Coincidence?

Actually Kelvin's column was not about Rocketman, but rather parents of a missing child.

I read the interview with Rocketman, he was singing the praises of the press in the UK, saying he would rather be here than in the USA

Didn't Ex of Rose from a Kiss become overly familiar with her bodyguard ?

But as we know there was more damaging stuff which came out in the next story and as Frank Carson used to say in his Irish accent " come here there's more"

Yes. I think.

I took that blind to mean a male rapper.

But why bother being married? Don't get it.

Some people have open marriages / relationships, it doesn't work for all but it will for some and as long as the couples are happy with it .

The injunction is there, not because of the nature of an open marriage, but because of the hypocricy. They practice one thing but preach another.

This is WHY it is in the public interest, and why they have an injunction.

If i had a foundation or charity, and my lifestyle went against the core beliefs that i preached to others, it would reflect poorly.

So did I

Exactly that's how it is for us. It works but I know it wouldn't for many others.

I understand the hypocrisy comment, which is why I don't advocate one type of lifestyle while living out another one.

As long as it works both ways..and its not just one partner having their cake and eating it!!!! and the other partner terrified of them leaving if they dont comply..that would be called disgusting,controlling and extremely unreasonable behaviour and would make the person living the open marriage scum.