• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • General Discussion Forums
  • General Discussion
Hillsborouģh
<<
<
22 of 50
>>
>
That username
27-04-2016
I can't help but wonder if the pendulum has swung the other way and to much blame is being put on the emergency services.

The gates were open to prevent a possible crush outside, I am sure the iverpool fans were not stood in an orderly queue as the game was about to start. Tragically there was an oversight and no one shut a gate inside.

The reason for the crush was the stamped of the crowd so how can the it be said that there was no blame on the fans.

If I pushed you over in the street because I was in a hurry, whose fault would it be.

Having said that I was at Hillsborough weeks before that tragedy, it was a nightmare to get in, the police struggled to maintain order, we ended , up crushed against a wall by a police horse,
anais32
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by Hugh Jboobs:
“ The Sun is a traditionally Conserative-supporting paper and in those days would have been very supportive of Mrs Thatcher's government.?”

It only became conservative supporting in the early 80s (or more correctly 1979 when Thatcher was running. It remained at least nominally inclined to Labour during the 70s.

It became voraciously Tory with MacKenzie at the helm.
WeeJintyMcGinty
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by Hugh Jboobs:
“
So does anyone know - how come The Sun used to sell well in the area, prior to the Hillsborough article they wrote?”

For the sport - particularly the football and horse racing pages.
Jol44
27-04-2016
Sad to see some people still repeating establishment lies.
anais32
27-04-2016
Andy Burnham has just brought up the similarities to Orgreave. There's no way there's NOT going to be a full public inquiry now. I hope those present (including those on these boards) have their stories straight....
anais32
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by marke09:
“The Sun though is still the UK's biggest read and selling newspaper”

Actually I believe it has been overtaken by the Daily Mail.

Not sure whether that's a good or bad thing.
lockes no 1 fan
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by marke09:
“The Sun though is still the UK's biggest read and selling newspaper”

which I think is a sad fact of todays society really, I would feel embarrassed to admit I read it, never mind going into a shop and buying it
Aurora13
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by anais32:
“It only became conservative supporting in the early 80s (or more correctly 1979 when Thatcher was running. It remained at least nominally inclined to Labour during the 70s.

It became voraciously Tory with MacKenzie at the helm.”

The Sun is popularist and swings it's allegiance in line with public mood. It swung Labour in 90's and remained so until they were not going to win in 2010.

This stuff about Hillsborough was actually playing to a popular sentiment at the time of football hooliganism. Got it so wrong but they were just doing their 'dog whistle' coverage. Today it's migrants and EU.

As not having it on front page they were damned if they did damned if they didn't. They would be just as much condemnation if they had run story.
Hobbit Feet
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by WeeJintyMcGinty:
“For the sport - particularly the football and horse racing pages.”

I think page 3 in no small way contributed to it's popularity too
lockes no 1 fan
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by That username:
“I can't help but wonder if the pendulum has swung the other way and to much blame is being put on the emergency services.

The gates were open to prevent a possible crush outside, I am sure the iverpool fans were not stood in an orderly queue as the game was about to start. Tragically there was an oversight and no one shut a gate inside.

The reason for the crush was the stamped of the crowd so how can the it be said that there was no blame on the fans.

If I pushed you over in the street because I was in a hurry, whose fault would it be.

Having said that I was at Hillsborough weeks before that tragedy, it was a nightmare to get in, the police struggled to maintain order, we ended , up crushed against a wall by a police horse,”

If you read the evidence you would be proven wrong, the fans were not to blame so you just have to deal with it
gashead
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by Eater Sundae:
“Edit. I also meant to say that I am concerned that the match commander is being made a scapegoat for what are bigger problems.”

How is he being made a scapegoat? AFAIA, he was ultimately in charge of every police officer there that day. Their action, or in-action, came from him, whether directly or in-directly through the officers below him. With rank comes the 'privilege' of no longer having to get your hands dirty, but it also means you have to carry the can for what those under your command do, and if those under him didn't act appropriately in this situation, it's because they weren't commanded properly, which was Duckenfield's job.

Any subsequent issues that arose need to be investigated as well as, not instead of, his failings on that day.
blackdogblack
27-04-2016
This article may be educational to some:

http://www.theguardian.com/world/201...can-be-avoided

"When the density is higher -
at about six people per square metre - bodies are jammed together so tightly that they can no longer choose where they go and they begin to behave like a fluid. Pressure waves can travel through them and they lose control."
Deep Purple
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by anais32:
“Well it looks like there is likely to be a full public inquiry into Orgreave now. How 'clean' do you really think the police case is going to look?

Same force, how much of a stretch is it to think they'd have used the same tactics?

In fact, IMO, they simply used the same methods at Hillsborough that had worked so brilliantly at Orgreave. Including a loathesome relationship with The Sun newspaper which it used as its propaganda organ.

Cover up by accusing the 'other side'. (In Orgreave they even arrested people on trumped up and bullshit charges). Use the skankiest newspaper in the country to peddle your lies. Take advantage of a 'sympathetic' government. Manufacture a story to get yourselves off the hook.”

In relation to what I said, I was correct. The horses went in following missile throwing, and warnings.

At Orgreave, there were Forces from all over the country, and I saw the missiles flying over a long period of time. It is also a fact that a mass picket was arranged for that day (and week), to try and win the strike.

There was no master plan to stitch anyone up, and it is clear some of the violence from both sides was unacceptable.

I had no involvement in what went on afterwards, but it wasn't as simple on the day as some try to portray it.
Aurora13
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by gashead:
“How is he being made a scapegoat? AFAIA, he was ultimately in charge of every police officer there that day. Their action, or in-action, came from him, whether directly or in-directly through the officers below him. With rank comes the 'privilege' of no longer having to get your hands dirty, but it also means you have to carry the can for what those under your command do, and if those under him didn't act appropriately in this situation, it's because they weren't commanded properly, which was Duckenfield's job.

Any subsequent issues that arose need to be investigated as well as, not instead of, his failings on that day.”

As my Dad said last night FA have responsibility in this. The semi final should never have been at Hillsborough. The issues which escalated that day were known.
wordfromthewise
27-04-2016
For me the issue that needs investigating from top to tail are the people in positions of authority who told lies about what happened to save their own necks......absolutely criminal and should be 100% treated as such even after such a long time afterwards.

Why it takes so long for these issues to get finally sorted time after time is another mystery to me.
Deep Purple
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by Aurora13:
“As my Dad said last night FA have responsibility in this. The semi final should never have been at Hillsborough. The issues which escalated that day were known.”

They were, and that issue seems to be mainly ignored.
Jayma
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by Mr Dos:
“no hooligans, no cages, no crush”

With that reasoning, why wasn't there a crush at every single football match? The cages weren't just set up for that particular match at that particular venue. Clearly something different happened at this match leading to the deaths of the 96 fans.

After 2 years of considering all the evidence, and after new admissions from some of the people involved, together with the recovery of information previously hidden (e.g. doctored statements where police officers stated they felt organisational failures that day by their own force had caused the crush), a jury has decided unanimously that the fans were not to blame for the incident, and have found the various authorities liable for unlawful killing by a majority verdict.

The authorities have acknowledged the verdict and made apologies, and the CPS will now consider whether action is to be taken, and if so, against whom.
anais32
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by Deep Purple:
“In relation to what I said, I was correct. The horses went in following missile throwing, and warnings.”

Yeah. And it was an IRA gunman who fired the first shot on Bloody Sunday....

(The stupid thing is, even after that has been shown not to be the case, people still believe it because the alternative is too inconvenient.)
marke09
27-04-2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmcQ1WJkpZE

still reduces you to tear s
Aurora13
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by Deep Purple:
“They were, and that issue seems to be mainly ignored.”

Aren't there other enquiries running which will look further than just accountability on that specific day. Inquest has concentrated on that so it becomes a police operational failure.
anais32
27-04-2016
Thing is, you couldn't have a proper inquiry into the police in the 80s because Thatcher used them to enforce unpopular policies.

They were thought untouchable in the 'tough on crime' 90s.

Now we have a home secretary who is not only willing to take them on; she's intent on it.
JELLIES0
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by Aurora13:
“The Sun is popularist and swings it's allegiance in line with public mood. It swung Labour in 90's and remained so until they were not going to win in 2010.

This stuff about Hillsborough was actually playing to a popular sentiment at the time of football hooliganism. Got it so wrong but they were just doing their 'dog whistle' coverage. Today it's migrants and EU.

As not having it on front page they were damned if they did damned if they didn't. They would be just as much condemnation if they had run story.”

They got it wrong because they believed the lies peddled by the police. The police lied to the general public, they lied in a briefing given to the Prime Minister, they even lied to the inquest which ended yesterday. Personally, given the information that they had from what should have been a trusted source I don't really blame The Sun.

One good thing is that Theresa May is very likely to sort out the police out. she won't take any of their nonsense.
Deep Purple
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by anais32:
“Yeah. And it was an IRA gunman who fired the first shot on Bloody Sunday....

(The stupid thing is, even after that has been shown not to be the case, people still believe it because the alternative is too inconvenient.)”

Who has shown that the horses went in before any missiles were thrown?

The horses weren't even there when the first missiles were lobbed, early in the morning.

I dont have to believe anything in relation to this that people claim, because I was there, and saw it.
anais32
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by Deep Purple:
“I dont have to believe anything in relation to this that people claim, because I was there, and saw it.”

So did all those paras on that day in 1972. They were there. They know the IRA shot first.

They lied.
MR_Pitkin
27-04-2016
Originally Posted by anais32:
“Thing is, you couldn't have a proper inquiry into the police in the 80s because Thatcher used them to enforce unpopular policies.

They were thought untouchable in the 'tough on crime' 90s.

Now we have a home secretary who is not only willing to take them on; she's intent on it.”

Meanwhile the criminals rub their hands with glee..
<<
<
22 of 50
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map