|
||||||||
EE - Working Out The Charages |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,176
|
EE - Working Out The Charages
Have been trying to work out who would be facing criminal Charges following the Lucy Beal fiasco.
So far I have it like this: Bobby Beale: Murder/Manslaughter Ian Beale: Perverting the course of justice. Making false statements to the Police. Wasting Police time. Jane Beale: Failing to report a death. Moving a body. Perverting the course of justice. Making false statements to the Police. Wasting Police time. Kathy Beale: Perverting the course of justice. Phil Mitchell: Bribing a juror. Perverting the course of just. Making false statements to the Police. Wasting Police time. Sharon Mitchell: Perverting the course of just. Making false statements to the Police. Wasting Police time. Suffice to say, they would all be facing prison time (well Bobby wouldn't go to prison initially) with things looking especially bleak for Phil who bribed a jury member as well as perverting the course of justice... |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,200
|
Quote:
Have been trying to work out who would be facing criminal Charges following the Lucy Beal fiasco.
So far I have it like this: Bobby Beale: Murder/Manslaughter Ian Beale: Perverting the course of justice. Making false statements to the Police. Wasting Police time. Jane Beale: Failing to report a death. Moving a body. Perverting the course of justice. Making false statements to the Police. Wasting Police time. Kathy Beale: Perverting the course of justice. Phil Mitchell: Bribing a juror. Perverting the course of just. Making false statements to the Police. Wasting Police time. Sharon Mitchell: Perverting the course of just. Making false statements to the Police. Wasting Police time. Jane beale must be classed as an accomplice. but yeah I was thnking the same, how are they going to explain away non of them going to prison (if that is what happens) I can see Phil and Sharon being left out of it but Lauren, Peter, Liam and Cindy also knew so are they going to be charged too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,176
|
Quote:
but Lauren, Peter, Liam and Cindy also knew so are they going to be charged too. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,667
|
Quote:
Jane beale must be classed as an accomplice.
but yeah I was thnking the same, how are they going to explain away non of them going to prison (if that is what happens) I can see Phil and Sharon being left out of it but Lauren, Peter, Liam and Cindy also knew so are they going to be charged too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,401
|
They've should have done it that Ian and everyone only found out tonight it was Bobby and then only Jane would be in trouble.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7,261
|
Alex Lamb for crimes against storylining
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,667
|
Quote:
Alex Lamb for crimes against storylining
Lou Beale will be haunting him saying "Worr 'ave you done to my famlee!?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Martin Fowler
Posts: 11,362
|
Plus DS Bryant if the truth were to come out about him not reporting Lauren's statement.
Can we add stating the bloody obvious to Kathy's charges?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,200
|
Quote:
Liam and Cindy have been sentenced to living with Carol.
![]() bit mean, they have Ricky too Quote:
They've should have done it that Ian and everyone only found out tonight it was Bobby and then only Jane would be in trouble.
it makes a mockery of the whole story and lucy being killed in that there is no satisfactory answer, they can't have all these people get off and they can't send them all to prison Ian's family were enriched with the history of the show, Bobby might have killed Lucy but DTC has struck the final blow and killed the Beale family. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 159
|
Quote:
They've should have done it that Ian and everyone only found out tonight it was Bobby and then only Jane would be in trouble.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 9,204
|
Quote:
Can we add stating the bloody obvious to Kathy's charges?
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 159
|
Another thought is that I doubt anything would happen with Phil bribing the jury as he won't admit to it, and the jury would be stupid to admit taking a bribe. Sharon could claim she knew nothing - which is true in every sense! Ian could claim he only just found out about it. Kathy I don't think gave a statement as she wasn't 'alive' during it.
Jane should be the only one to be worried as she directly helped in covering the whole thing up. Although Abi should be sent down after deliberately lying to get her own father sent down. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 9,204
|
Quote:
This. I still can't understand though why after this Sharon is still trying to cover for him. She helped cover up the murder of Lucy, but after Denny and the spider were attacked she said something needed doing to stop him, OK so he got sent to boarding school but that clearly hasn't worked, it just seems so unbelievable that she is trying to help him - or is it just because she is trying to protect her "family"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,200
|
Quote:
Plus DS Bryant if the truth were to come out about him not reporting Lauren's statement.
Can we add stating the bloody obvious to Kathy's charges? ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 159
|
Quote:
Maybe her brain didnt come back to life with the rest of her
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 13,155
|
It's very difficult to see how Jane in particular can get away with not going to prison.. perhaps the rest of them will get suspended sentences
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 31,001
|
Quote:
This. I still can't understand though why after this Sharon is still trying to cover for him. She helped cover up the murder of Lucy, but after Denny and the spider were attacked she said something needed doing to stop him, OK so he got sent to boarding school but that clearly hasn't worked, it just seems so unbelievable that she is trying to help him - or is it just because she is trying to protect her "family"?
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,200
|
Quote:
It's very difficult to see how Jane in particular can get away with not going to prison.. perhaps the rest of them will get suspended sentences
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,176
|
Quote:
It's very difficult to see how Jane in particular can get away with not going to prison.. perhaps the rest of them will get suspended sentences
Jane's situation is particularly bleak because she also moved the body, tampered with a crime scene and failed to report the death. Out of everyone, though, Phil would probably get the longest sentence if his bribery of a Jury member came to light. With that and the perversion charge he'd easily be looking at 5+ years behind bars. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,130
|
I'm desperate to know how this will pan out!, I think Sharon and Phil will be ok but are the whole Beale clan going down? DTC has left a mess for someone else to sort out. Although I do wonder if perhaps Adam Woodyatt has decided to leave and this has been the agreed outcome from the start of this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,746
|
Quote:
Have been trying to work out who would be facing criminal Charges following the Lucy Beal fiasco.
So far I have it like this: Bobby Beale: Murder/Manslaughter |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,176
|
Quote:
It would be Manslaughter. He didnt intend to kill her when he chucked the jewellary box at her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London Town
Posts: 8,791
|
I think he might be charged with unlawful killing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,200
|
Quote:
Agreed it was Manslaughter... Though by covering it all up, the Beales have done everything they can to make it look like murder...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,629
|
Quote:
It would be Manslaughter. He didnt intend to kill her when he chucked the jewellary box at her.
I need to go back and watch again but I think they said they would charge Bobby with GBH for his attack on Jane. Should Jane die he is likely facing a murder charge. As for Lucy it is going to depend on what Bobby actually says. What did he intend when he attacked her? The law of murder is set out in common law. The legal definition of murder is 'the unlawful killing of a human being in the Queen's peace, with malice aforethought'. The actus reus of murder consists of the unlawful killing of a human being in the Queen's peace. The mens rea of murder is malice aforethought, which has been interpreted by the courts as meaning intention to kill or intention to cause GBH. A murder conviction carries a mandatory life sentence. The judge passing sentence can not pass a lesser sentence no matter how mitigating the circumstances might be. There exist three partial defences to murder which may reduce the conviction to voluntary manslaughter which carries a maximum sentence of life and thus allows the judge discretion on sentencing. These partial defences are contained in the Homicide Act 1957 and consist of diminished responsibility, provocation and suicide pact. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:43.




