|
||||||||
Why is Phil so keen for Max to stay in prison? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 644
|
Why is Phil so keen for Max to stay in prison?
Sorry but I'm in need of some clarification for understanding Phil's motivations in this storyline - mainly why he was at first happy to turn in Ben and then why he bribed the jury to find Max guilty. There was a period of a few months last year when I didn't watch so am struggling to piece all of this together.
Ben's fingerprints were found on Lucy's phone but why was this enough of a motivation for Phil to make sure Ben was found guilty? Why was he not defending his son? After that when it turned out Max was the prime suspect why was Phil then so keen to see him found guilty? Keen enough to actually bribe the jury? Not just out of favour to Ian? Apologies for cluttering up the board but feel as if I need some clarification on this and I know that people here will help me out! |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,178
|
Max blamed Phil for Emma's death. Phil ended up in Prison and Ben was in charge of the family businesses.
Max scammed The Arches from Ben. He did so because he blamed Phil for Emma's death. When Phil came out he sought his revenge on Max. Phil and Max now hate each other so it was convenient for Phil to have him kept in prison |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,824
|
Why *did* Max blame Phil for Emma's death though?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 13,143
|
The bit I don't get is why the Mitchells would be so worried about it coming out that he bribed the foreman of the jury - why would it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,178
|
Quote:
Why *did* Max blame Phil for Emma's death though?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,178
|
Quote:
The bit I don't get is why the Mitchells would be so worried about it coming out that he bribed the foreman of the jury - why would it?
edit sorry I didnt read your post properly. I guess Sharon is just panicking and trying to protect Phil. but if the police look into the trial details re Max they might query how he was found guilty or someone might fess up if a re- trial is ordered who knows |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 159
|
Quote:
The bit I don't get is why the Mitchells would be so worried about it coming out that he bribed the foreman of the jury - why would it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,156
|
Because Phil's sexual desires for Max will resurface if he see's him around the square.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,178
|
Quote:
Because Phil's sexual desires for Max will resurface if he see's him around the square.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 159
|
Quote:
Because Phil's sexual desires for Max will resurface if he see's him around the square.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 30,976
|
Quote:
They would both be stupid to admit that, so I can't see how anything would come of that storyline. There wouldn't be any evidence on this as Phil probably paid him off in cash from his self replenishing wall safe, rather than doing a bank transfer with the reference 'Max Branning Bribe Money'.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 644
|
What happened in the very beginning for him to be so uncharacteristically happy to blame it on Ben?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,413
|
To be honest, I don't really get it either. Initially, he was happy for max to take the blame as it took the focus off Ben. But once he knew it was bobby, I can't remember why he still wanted max to go down. Did he say he did it for sharon? I think sharon wanted to help Ian protect bobby so Phil bribed the foreman of the jury to make sure max would go down and no more questions would be asked.
The thing is there is no proof that he bribed the foreman - even with max's innocence coming to light there's no reason for the police to think the jury was tampered with, and less reason to assume Phil was involved. Phil, Sharon, Ian and Jane were the only ones that knew and none of them are going to go to the police with that info! and Phil got his revenge on Max by taking everything he owned so I don't get why he is so keen for him to stay in jail either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,178
|
Quote:
What happened in the very beginning for him to be so uncharacteristically happy to blame it on Ben?
Phil didnt know about Bobby when that happened. I dont think anyway, cant remember, so i might not have the above in the right order |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,178
|
Quote:
To be honest, I don't really get it either. Initially, he was happy for max to take the blame as it took the focus off Ben. But once he knew it was bobby, I can't remember why he still wanted max to go down. Did he say he did it for sharon? I think sharon wanted to help Ian protect bobby so Phil bribed the foreman of the jury to make sure max would go down and no more questions would be asked.
The thing is there is no proof that he bribed the foreman - even with max's innocence coming to light there's no reason for the police to think the jury was tampered with, and less reason to assume Phil was involved. Phil, Sharon, Ian and Jane were the only ones that knew and none of them are going to go to the police with that info! and Phil got his revenge on Max by taking everything he owned so I don't get why he is so keen for him to stay in jail either. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,646
|
Once Buster arrived there were just too many bald men in the Square. Terry thingamy who was Bianca's bf is currently being held captive in Guatemala.
As Highlander said "There can be only one!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,608
|
Max stole his business. You don't get one up on the Mitchells, no matter what they've done to you. It has to be said, Max isn't necessarily blameless in the whole Lucy story - granted he didn't kill her, but he isn't squeaky clean either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,413
|
Quote:
Phil was supposed to bribe the foreman to bring back a not guilty plea on max, that is what sharon asked him to do, but he did the opposite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Country lad in Yorkshire
Posts: 118,038
|
Philth is filth
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The Sixth Circle of Hell
Posts: 20,174
|
Why?
Because the man is lowlife scum - it's as simple as that. And strangely anyone who gets involved with him becomes scum as well - just look at Sharon - scum in doormat form. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,338
|
Quote:
Max stole his business. You don't get one up on the Mitchells, no matter what they've done to you. It has to be said, Max isn't necessarily blameless in the whole Lucy story - granted he didn't kill her, but he isn't squeaky clean either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The Sixth Circle of Hell
Posts: 20,174
|
Quote:
Max stole his business. You don't get one up on the Mitchells, no matter what they've done to you. It has to be said, Max isn't necessarily blameless in the whole Lucy story - granted he didn't kill her, but he isn't squeaky clean either.
If Godzilla, King Kong and Superman teamed up to face him TPTB would still have their little bald God come out on top. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 644
|
Why the hell would he risk a 5-year jail sentence for bribing the jury (to make the verdict not guilty) just to appease Jane's conscience as a favour? Did he have another motive to make sure Max didn't go down? But then doesn't that go against what he's wanted all along?
So very confused. I like the storyline in general but the pursuit for twist after twist ultimately makes it rather convoluted and character intentions very sketchy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 30,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: With MyAndy!
Posts: 15,178
|
Quote:
Yes that's right, but when she found out what he'd done I'm sure he tried to justify it in some way. Will have to see if I can find the clip
![]() Quote:
Why the hell would he risk a 5-year jail sentence for bribing the jury (to make the verdict not guilty) just to appease Jane's conscience as a favour? Did he have another motive to make sure Max didn't go down? But then doesn't that go against what he's wanted all along?
So very confused. I like the storyline in general but the pursuit for twist after twist ultimately makes it rather convoluted and character intentions very sketchy. Phil's motive was he keeps his frenemy locked up, Max screwed him over so he got revenge then went a step further. Sharon wanted Max to get off so an innocent man didnt go to prison, Phil paid the foreman to find max Guilty |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:33.



