|
||||||||
EastEnders Week 23 Spoilers |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South West England
Posts: 4,636
|
EastEnders Week 23 Spoilers
Monday 6th June 2016
Donna reels from her drunken actions. Lauren receives some disappointing news. Pam struggles with the Cokers' growing financial problems. Tuesday 7th June 2016 Les takes a stand against Babe but will his plan work? Vincent is stunned by Donna's latest bombshell. Lauren grows frustrated by Ian's behaviour. Thursday 9th June 2016 Lauren reaches out to Max but will she get a response? Kim turns to Patrick for support. Louise meddles with Bex and Shakil . Friday 10th June 2016 Ian gets a wake up call. Kim finds herself in an uncomfortable position. Source: Digiguide.tv |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,817
|
So I take it that this will be the last week before all the football clashes come in?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31,192
|
Donnas storyline sounds absolutely tedious. Sounds like a lot of the reserve characters are getting some screen time after some big weeks for the Beales and Mitchell's.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 789
|
Could Max make a brief appearence?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 622
|
Summer has arrived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 992
|
Steven is back this week
As far as I know Max does not make an appearance, someone visits him...but I don't know if we'll see that visit. And there's something a bit weird between two characters mentioned.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,622
|
Still no storyline for Johnny. This is getting a bit silly now. What's the point of bringing a character back and promptly treating them as a glorified extra?
And are we really expected to care about the Grange Hill crap with the Louise, Shakil and Bex? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 125,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31,192
|
Oh and this Louise, Bex, Shakil stuff is also tedious drivel. Do I care whether he ends up with the Mouthy shoplifter or the lying goth? No I don't.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 31,192
|
Quote:
Still no storyline for Johnny. This is getting a bit silly now. What's the point of bringing a character back and promptly treating them as a glorified extra?
And are we really expected to care about the Grange Hill crap with the Louise, Shakil and Bex? |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Martin Fowler
Posts: 11,362
|
Donna? Kim? Louise, Bex and Shakil? This doesnt exactly fill me with anticipation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,622
|
Quote:
And there's something a bit weird between two characters mentioned.. ![]() Quote:
All the Carters seem to be having a quiet month, we are no further forward with Ollie. In fact I'd rather the Carters took centre stage over the likes of the Cokers and Donna.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 992
|
Quote:
Donna? Kim? Louise, Bex and Shakil? This doesnt exactly fill me with anticipation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 992
|
Quote:
I could be completely wrong but would the two characters be Donna and Vincent? That's all I'll ask, I don't want to say what I think it is in case I'm completely on the wrong lines.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,622
|
Quote:
Yes. It is....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 8,756
|
Thanks for these James
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Albert Square.
Posts: 46,296
|
Quote:
Oh and this Louise, Bex, Shakil stuff is also tedious drivel. Do I care whether he ends up with the Mouthy shoplifter or the lying goth? No I don't.
can't say I am looking forward to this storyline, but I do like gobby Louise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Martin Fowler
Posts: 11,362
|
Quote:
Kim, Claudette, Donna, Vincent, Patrick are in one story...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Plymouth Devon
Posts: 12,497
|
Sounds a more Quiet week.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 569
|
summer has started
Have to admit It is the time when Eastenders is pretty quite up till September building up to xmas. So not really surprised it will be a quite few weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: I like to singy singy singy...
Posts: 17,667
|
Quote:
Still no storyline for Johnny. This is getting a bit silly now. What's the point of bringing a character back and promptly treating them as a glorified extra?
And are we really expected to care about the Grange Hill crap with the Louise, Shakil and Bex? |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,342
|
Quote:
Still no storyline for Johnny. This is getting a bit silly now. What's the point of bringing a character back and promptly treating them as a glorified extra?
And are we really expected to care about the Grange Hill crap with the Louise, Shakil and Bex? |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,622
|
Quote:
I know you are fan but perhaps he is being rested for a bit after his introduction wasn't that popular
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,342
|
Quote:
You do realise that scripts are written at least six months in advance?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 11,622
|
Quote:
I doubt there was much to write for him. Although I agree there is little point to the comeback if he just replaces his sister in the dress up karokee type role that probably made her leave.
I mean, it's obviously the second one, because they do plan storylines in advance, they don't just write depending on immediate audience reaction, but that's what I'm trying to say: I can't understand the point of bringing him back to have him do precisely nothing. You'd have thought that DTC would have wanted to have proved Sam Strike wrong when he said that he felt Johnny had gone stale as a character due to lack of development, but if anything they're treating Ted's Johnny even more carelessly than they did with Sam's Johnny by the end. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:42.




