Tumar Kr
Who is your wildcard
2 of 3
Originally Posted by Ano:
“TUMAR KR!!!!!! All the rest can bog off for all I care and some of you people really want to see yet another dog act or is this you winding us people up who actually want to see some excitement and real talent in the final..”
“TUMAR KR!!!!!! All the rest can bog off for all I care and some of you people really want to see yet another dog act or is this you winding us people up who actually want to see some excitement and real talent in the final..”
Some of us who love dogs would actually like to see a dog act in the final again, strange as it may seem to you. Why should Trip not be allowed a chance just because there have been 2 previous dog winners? That's like saying there have been previous dance winners, so we don't want to see any more dancers.
Originally Posted by Midnight Moggy:
“Some of us who love dogs would actually like to see a dog act in the final again, strange as it may seem to you. Why should Trip not be allowed a chance just because there have been 2 previous dog winners? That's like saying there have been previous dance winners, so we don't want to see any more dancers.”
“Some of us who love dogs would actually like to see a dog act in the final again, strange as it may seem to you. Why should Trip not be allowed a chance just because there have been 2 previous dog winners? That's like saying there have been previous dance winners, so we don't want to see any more dancers.”
Well I love dogs and have two, and I don't want them to go through in fact I am sick of the dog acts,
Originally Posted by Roobs:
“Trip Hazard.
Tumar KR are more deserving though.”
“Trip Hazard.
Tumar KR are more deserving though.”
Deserving because of being double jointed ?
Originally Posted by Midnight Moggy:
“Some of us who love dogs would actually like to see a dog act in the final again, strange as it may seem to you. Why should Trip not be allowed a chance just because there have been 2 previous dog winners? That's like saying there have been previous dance winners, so we don't want to see any more dancers.”
“Some of us who love dogs would actually like to see a dog act in the final again, strange as it may seem to you. Why should Trip not be allowed a chance just because there have been 2 previous dog winners? That's like saying there have been previous dance winners, so we don't want to see any more dancers.”
Simple answer to your response to my previous post, I think the queens gotten her fair share of dog acts I can just picture the queen pulling nauseating faces while watching Tumar KR's routine now that's a picture worth framing right there but I guess people who love a dog act just like yourself don't want my fascinating tale to come true do you?
And were you actually present during that dog act yesterday during results show or what?
Tumar KR easily. Honestly, if they don't get through then there really is no point in watching the final, it will be incredibly boring.
Originally Posted by Ano:
“Simple answer to your response to my previous post, I think the queens gotten her fair share of dog acts I can just picture the queen pulling nauseating faces while watching Tumar KR's routine now that's a picture worth framing right there but I guess people who love a dog act just like yourself don't want my fascinating tale to come true do you? And were you actually present during that dog act yesterday during results show or what?”
“Simple answer to your response to my previous post, I think the queens gotten her fair share of dog acts I can just picture the queen pulling nauseating faces while watching Tumar KR's routine now that's a picture worth framing right there but I guess people who love a dog act just like yourself don't want my fascinating tale to come true do you?
And were you actually present during that dog act yesterday during results show or what?”
What everyone though of Jules, Matisse and Friends yesterday has no relevance to Trip Hazard's potential. So you are saying because that was not the best performance we have ever seen from Jules and Matisse, therefore Trip Hazard is likely to be rubbish? Odd kind of logic.
Originally Posted by Midnight Moggy:
“What everyone though of Jules, Matisse and Friends yesterday has no relevance to Trip Hazard's potential. So you are saying because that was not the best performance we have ever seen from Jules and Matisse, therefore Trip Hazard is likely to be rubbish? Odd kind of logic.”
“What everyone though of Jules, Matisse and Friends yesterday has no relevance to Trip Hazard's potential. So you are saying because that was not the best performance we have ever seen from Jules and Matisse, therefore Trip Hazard is likely to be rubbish? Odd kind of logic.”
No logic needed found the dog act boring tonight and will find it boring during the end of times.
Hmm, humans who can do the most incredible things with their bodies or a dog who can stand on his back legs? Let me think about that for 0.0002 seconds
Originally Posted by Blondie X:
“Hmm, humans who can do the most incredible things with their bodies or a dog who can stand on his back legs? Let me think about that for 0.0002 seconds”
“Hmm, humans who can do the most incredible things with their bodies or a dog who can stand on his back legs? Let me think about that for 0.0002 seconds”
It might look easy, but it takes a lot of training and work to achieve a perfect routine like that. It's the talent of the owner, not just the dog.
Trip.
I think trip was second tonight
Simon should have put him through. Disappointed that Jasmine was put through
, after all we already have Beau who is a far better singer. It is supposed to be variety.
I am routing for Trip all the way, but I think the GBP will put Billy Elliot through. Judges may go for Trip though according to what Simon said - 'Thank god for the wild card' when he was making his decision to put Jasmine through.
I think trip was second tonight
Simon should have put him through. Disappointed that Jasmine was put through
, after all we already have Beau who is a far better singer. It is supposed to be variety.I am routing for Trip all the way, but I think the GBP will put Billy Elliot through. Judges may go for Trip though according to what Simon said - 'Thank god for the wild card' when he was making his decision to put Jasmine through.
Originally Posted by Ano:
“No logic needed found the dog act boring tonight and will find it boring during the end of times.”
“No logic needed found the dog act boring tonight and will find it boring during the end of times.”
If you found it boring that's fair enough, but why bring Jules and Matisse into it then? Suggests you just don't like dog acts full stop!
Originally Posted by Midnight Moggy:
“If you found it boring that's fair enough, but why bring Jules and Matisse into it then? Suggests you just don't like dog acts full stop!”
“If you found it boring that's fair enough, but why bring Jules and Matisse into it then? Suggests you just don't like dog acts full stop!”
Finally! You got it I don't like dog acts full stop.
Originally Posted by Ano:
“Finally! You got it I don't like dog acts full stop.”
“Finally! You got it I don't like dog acts full stop.
”
Why not just say so in the first place, instead of pretending it was because there had been too many previous dog acts?
It's a shame really to write off a whole category like that. I mean the dangerous stunt acts are not normally my kind of thing, but I still watched Alex's performance without any pre-conceived ideas, and ended up thinking it was amazing and voting for him.
Originally Posted by Midnight Moggy:
“Why not just say so in the first place, instead of pretending it was because there had been too many previous dog acts?
It's a shame really to write off a whole category like that. I mean the dangerous stunt acts are not normally my kind of thing, but I still watched Alex's performance without any pre-conceived ideas, and ended up thinking it was amazing and voting for him.”
“Why not just say so in the first place, instead of pretending it was because there had been too many previous dog acts?
It's a shame really to write off a whole category like that. I mean the dangerous stunt acts are not normally my kind of thing, but I still watched Alex's performance without any pre-conceived ideas, and ended up thinking it was amazing and voting for him.”
Look maybe I'm being a bit harsh but I've given these dog acts chances trust me how I have, all the dogs ever seem to do is stand on two legs and jump about I've seen that a hundred times what's so different about this particular dog act, that's what I want to know is it the different breed of dog it has to be right?
Originally Posted by Ano:
“Look maybe I'm being a bit harsh but I've given these dog acts chances trust me how I have, all the dogs ever seem to do is stand on two legs and jump about I've seen that a hundred times what's so different about this particular dog act, that's what I want to know is it the different breed of dog it has to be right?”
“Look maybe I'm being a bit harsh but I've given these dog acts chances trust me how I have, all the dogs ever seem to do is stand on two legs and jump about I've seen that a hundred times what's so different about this particular dog act, that's what I want to know is it the different breed of dog it has to be right?”
Well no, he was doing quite a lot more than that. It shouldn't really be about the breed, but of course Trip Hazard is particularly cute, so that is going to appeal to lot of voters.
Originally Posted by Midnight Moggy:
“Well no, he was doing quite a lot more than that. It shouldn't really be about the breed, but of course Trip Hazard is particularly cute, so that is going to appeal to lot of voters.”
“Well no, he was doing quite a lot more than that. It shouldn't really be about the breed, but of course Trip Hazard is particularly cute, so that is going to appeal to lot of voters.”
I know all I'm trying to say is that is it the breed of the dog that makes its so very different from the previous dog acts? This is a genuine question by the way I'm intrigued.
Originally Posted by Ano:
“I know all I'm trying to say is that is it the breed of the dog that makes its so very different from the previous dog acts? This is a genuine question by the way I'm intrigued.”
“I know all I'm trying to say is that is it the breed of the dog that makes its so very different from the previous dog acts? This is a genuine question by the way I'm intrigued.”
Well it makes a change to see a small dog doing this, because it's usually bigger dogs and breeds that are thought of as more trainable, like collies.
Originally Posted by Midnight Moggy:
“It might look easy, but it takes a lot of training and work to achieve a perfect routine like that. It's the talent of the owner, not just the dog.”
“It might look easy, but it takes a lot of training and work to achieve a perfect routine like that. It's the talent of the owner, not just the dog.”
Maybe but dogs on their back legs and walking on their owners back isn't my idea of entertainment. After the initial 3 seconds of 'aww it's cute' I'm done.
Now if someone could train a cat to perform, I'd be impressed
2 of 3
