• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Strictly Come Dancing
  • Strictly Come Dancing Appreciation
Jay McGuiness and Aliona Vilani appreciation thread - Part 6
<<
<
191 of 691
>>
>
Isih
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by Lindy_Loue:
“Had to take a break - bit of a family emergency - but am back on it now Wow, we're good at this ”

Hope it's nothing serious, Lindy

We'd get there a bit quicker if I could stop clicking on the picture of Jay by mistake
Lindy_Loue
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by Isih:
“Hope it's nothing serious, Lindy

We'd get there a bit quicker if I could stop clicking on the picture of Jay by mistake”

(Pregnant daughter not feeling well)

I too keep clicking on the pic. Think my fingers are swelling and getting less accurate
Ano
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by Lola the cat:
“In my minute break I have been reading a thread on the MT about participants who have benefited from Strictly - it's hysterical, there is one particular poster who, well just seems to dislike everyone except her favourite, tosses hair (that's a hint if you haven't read it). Should I point out that sales at local theatre for BAT when her darling is appearing, apart from the Wed matinee when the coach trips of OAPs are deposited there for the afternoon are not exactly setting the world alight, in fact pretty abysmal at the moment. But probably not worth it, she would only come up with some excuse.”

I tried to set this person straight wink wink I noticed that when I pointed something out it shut this person up completely and they couldn't reply back with something intelligent, therefore I just couldn't be bothered to post anything else because I have a giant list that includes a million points that would allow this person to think twice, however i'm a nice enough person to just quit while I'm a ahead lol. Funny how this poster pointed out that BAT had gotten some bad reviews yet there were good reviews too, I'm sure when her darling appears she'll attract some mixed bag of opinions.
DeiseDays
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by Isih:
“Hope it's nothing serious, Lindy

We'd get there a bit quicker if I could stop clicking on the picture of Jay by mistake”

I believe that's known as a Birdian slip ...
StrictlyRed
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by Isih:
“We'd get there a bit quicker if I could stop clicking on the picture of Jay by mistake”

Annoying, isn't it?

Every time I do it I think "whoops, I've just lost J another vote again".
DeiseDays
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by StrictlyRed:
“Annoying, isn't it?

Every time I do it I think "whoops, I've just lost J another vote again".”

Just think of it as a motivational popup
Lindy_Loue
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by DeiseDays:
“I believe that's known as a Birdian slip ... ”

I'm good at those
CatO9Tales
31-07-2016
Back from Sunday family duties and ready to vote!

Looking at the number of votes on the other poll, Hairy doesn't stand a chance - and if he does, it really will be suspicious.

Still suspicious of voting patterns on Friday night - 4% drops in the space of a single click just shouldn't have happened.

However, it's a bitsy itsy poll so just a bit of fun ..
DeiseDays
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by CatO9Tales:
“Back from Sunday family duties and ready to vote!

Looking at the number of votes on the other poll, Hairy doesn't stand a chance - and if he does, it really will be suspicious.

Still suspicious of voting patterns on Friday night - 4% drops in the space of a single click just shouldn't have happened.

However, it's a bitsy itsy poll so just a bit of fun .. ”

A hairy fan has been tweeting jnb to ask if she has "evidence" of cheating beacuse they want to ask Radio Times to change the voting format for the final

Karma
KorkyTheCat
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by BionicBard:
“Meanwhile Borewood's stuck, like a barnacle goose
That gurn won't budge, just won't shake loose
It's stuck forever, oh what bad luck
for that coiffed and preening tufted duck!”

Hardwood is no better than a vulture
Preying on those who have more culture
And so jealous of our first finisher
Who's as graceful as a bright kingfisher
CatO9Tales
31-07-2016
Having now seen the number of votes cast, the stupid thing is that if the 13,100 people who like Jay's Mickey instagram post cast 25 votes each, Hairy would be consigned to the plughole!
StrictlyRed
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by DeiseDays:
“A hairy fan has been tweeting jnb to ask if she has "evidence" of cheating beacuse they want to ask Radio Times to change the voting format for the final

Karma ”

I'm sure they do!!😂😂

A bit like asking to swop from First Past the Post to Proportional Representation two hours before the polls close in a General Election!
jnb_7
31-07-2016
IMO those two 4% losses off Jays votes on Friday late night ( or adding to poldarks, you choose) could well have been the Alycia lot trying to get rid of Jay......or the online champion.
Or, they had a bot we noticed & called them out so they stopped when they were far enough ahead, who knows,
But. The other semi final winners will annihilate in the final them so hey ho karma, as Deise says...
Lola the cat
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by jnb_7:
“IMO those two 4% losses off Jays votes on Friday late night ( or adding to poldarks, you choose) could well have been the Alycia lot trying to get rid of Jay......or the online champion.
Or, they had a bot we noticed & called them out so they stopped when they were far enough ahead, who knows,
But. The other semi final winners will annihilate in the final them so hey ho karma, as Deise says...”

The 4% drops are suspicious because they were not sustained. Up to that point J's percentage had been going up roughly 1% every 30-35 mins so a 4% drop in 1 minute would mean that a substantial number of people all decided to vote at that one moment, which given the voting up to that point is not realistic. The fact that the voting then immediately reverted to type is the dodgy element as the large drop in voting was not maintained.
Whiffle_09
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by CatO9Tales:
“Having now seen the number of votes cast, the stupid thing is that if the 13,100 people who like Jay's Mickey instagram post cast 25 votes each, Hairy would be consigned to the plughole!”

Hope his Jayship is pleased at all the maths going on on this thread today
Lola the cat
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by Whiffle_09:
“Hope his Jayship is pleased at all the maths going on on this thread today”

Perhaps we ought to have a maths class in our school as well, we already have English Literature and Music Appreciation lessons and not forgetting the Craft lessons (knit and twitch club, sorry can't remember what is was called
CatO9Tales
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by Lola the cat:
“The 4% drops are suspicious because they were not sustained. Up to that point J's percentage had been going up roughly 1% every 30-35 mins so a 4% drop in 1 minute would mean that a substantial number of people all decided to vote at that one moment, which given the voting up to that point is not realistic. The fact that the voting then immediately reverted to type is the dodgy element as the large drop in voting was not maintained.”

The 4% drops I saw happened in the time it takes to vote once - standing at 38% odd, back to voting screen, click, click, back to results screen, bingo, 34%. probably takes 5 seconds. Something wrong somewhere ....
DeiseDays
31-07-2016
Woooohooo, 180k is toast

Looks like Whiffle's tentative suggestion of 200,00 could be achievable
Lola the cat
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by CatO9Tales:
“The 4% drops I saw happened in the time it takes to vote once - standing at 38% odd, back to voting screen, click, click, back to results screen, bingo, 34%. probably takes 5 seconds. Something wrong somewhere ....”

It happened in my minute sitting on the sidelines

On the other semi when Alycia was in the lead the youtube man apparently put out a snapchat saying the vote was rigged, her vote then promptly dropped like J's did.

Twilight music in the background - do do do do...something odd going on in RTs land
StrictlyRed
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by CatO9Tales:
“The 4% drops I saw happened in the time it takes to vote once - standing at 38% odd, back to voting screen, click, click, back to results screen, bingo, 34%. probably takes 5 seconds. Something wrong somewhere ....”

Without the loss of 2 x 4% the vote could have been around 50/50, which would roughly equate with what we were getting in the "bare chest versus jive" tv moment poll from a while back. We nearly won that one up until the last moment, too.
Whiffle_09
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by DeiseDays:
“Woooohooo, 180k is toast

Looks like Whiffle's tentative suggestion of 200,00 could be achievable ”

181k passed now in 15mins. If the rate continues we could hit 200k by 9.45pm

ETA 182k @17.01
Lola the cat
31-07-2016
First Maths Lesson

https://youtu.be/DnSXKWdU-2k

It's only 1 min 26 secs so won't eat into voting duties.
KorkyTheCat
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by StrictlyRed:
“Without the loss of 2 x 4% the vote could have been around 50/50, which would roughly equate with what we were getting in the "bare chest versus jive" tv moment poll from a while back. We nearly won that one up until the last moment, too.”

If I recall (may be wrong) we were trying to find out when the closing time of the poll was and J had been in the lead, then A overtook him momentarily and the poll suddenly closed!
KorkyTheCat
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by Whiffle_09:
“181k passed now in 15mins. If the rate continues we could hit 200k by 9.45pm

ETA 182k @17.01”

Cheering Whiffleworkings!
DeiseDays
31-07-2016
Originally Posted by Whiffle_09:
“181k passed now in 15mins. If the rate continues we could hit 200k by 9.45pm

ETA 182k @17.01”

183k stamped, official
<<
<
191 of 691
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map