DS Forums

 
 

World Wrestling Entertainment Discussion 42 (Spoilers)


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22-11-2016, 03:20
calderyon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,234
Triple H to interfere and cost Seth the championship?
calderyon is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 22-11-2016, 03:22
calderyon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,234
2 title matches next week. Obviously trying to steal Smackdown Live´s spotlight because of TLC being on that week.
calderyon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 03:27
richie4eva
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Avengers Mansion
Posts: 168,534
Triple H to interfere and cost Seth the championship?
Wouldn't be surprised
richie4eva is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 03:38
James Frederick
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 36,992
If 205 Live does well I wonder if they will add a Cruiserweight Tag Team Championship in time.

Not yet but if it's a permanent show what goes on for a few years I can see one being needed.
James Frederick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 04:13
James Frederick
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 36,992
Rollins will get a rematch and Jericho and Owens will get punished for disobeying Foley.
James Frederick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 04:14
James Frederick
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 36,992
Plus Jericho dressed as Sin Cara must be a rib after the bus fight.
James Frederick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 07:52
JEStansfield
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 442
Bill Goldberg vs Brock Lesner was the biggest insult to anyone who watches or wrestles for WWE that I've seen in a long time.

Lesner has torn through everyone for years and then in walks someone who hasn't even had a match in over a decade and they book a squash job.

Talk about two fingers up to all the guys and girls who work full time for WWE and go on the road for them and to all the people who have been watching, wondering which up and coming guy will be the one to defeat Lesner.
JEStansfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 08:05
dave_windows
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,354
http://www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/...esnar-rematch/

I sort of get it now. it´s bound to happen, since there is no way they would let last night be the end of this feud. No way.
I wish this was the end of the feud.
dave_windows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 08:06
dave_windows
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,354
Brock attacks Goldberg at RR leading to another match at WM.

Will be so annoyed if they actually have him win it
That seems to be the obvious choice, Goldberg tosses Lesnar out so Brock illegally eliminates him, match at Wrestlemania and Goldberg jobs.
dave_windows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 08:07
Harris_07
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London
Posts: 23,152
If Goldberg doesn't face Lesnar at WM, who would you have them both to go up against?

I'd say:

Lesnar - Seth Rollins in a title match (they could/would mention that Lesnar has faught Rollins' Sheild brothers at the past two WMs)

Goldberg - Tricky one due to his age and possible health concerns, maybe Undertaker. Or Roman Reigns.
Harris_07 is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 08:13
dave_windows
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,354
Demolition are part of the group of Wrestlers suing WWE so maybe WWE are doing this to take the record off them.
I wonder if Demolition may show up one day for one night. I know Ax is suing WWE but there been too many instances WWE keep mentioning the team.
dave_windows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 08:15
dave_windows
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,354
Bill Goldberg vs Brock Lesner was the biggest insult to anyone who watches or wrestles for WWE that I've seen in a long time.
No it isnt! Brock, Vince & Hunter all decided it.

How can it be a insult? Im sure there has been many a times when a match has gone on short.
dave_windows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 08:37
JEStansfield
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 442
No it isnt! Brock, Vince & Hunter all decided it.

How can it be a insult? Im sure there has been many a times when a match has gone on short.
Did you even bother to read the second half of what I wrote?
JEStansfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 11:31
Hollie_Louise
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 31,653
I wonder if Demolition may show up one day for one night. I know Ax is suing WWE but there been too many instances WWE keep mentioning the team.
They won't because they are getting sued. Vince has been known to put personal feelings aside for business (at times, not always) but I can't recall a time when he gave TV time to somebody trying to sue him. And why would they want to?

They are mentioning them because they hold a record thay an active team can beat. There will be no appearance.
Hollie_Louise is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 12:37
James Frederick
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 36,992
They won't because they are getting sued. Vince has been known to put personal feelings aside for business (at times, not always) but I can't recall a time when he gave TV time to somebody trying to sue him. And why would they want to?

They are mentioning them because they hold a record thay an active team can beat. There will be no appearance.
Even if Vince was willing to have them appear they wouldn't as it would hurt their court case if they worked for WWE again even if it was only for one night.
James Frederick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 13:10
The_don1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7,432
Bill Goldberg vs Brock Lesner was the biggest insult to anyone who watches or wrestles for WWE that I've seen in a long time.

Lesner has torn through everyone for years and then in walks someone who hasn't even had a match in over a decade and they book a squash job.

Talk about two fingers up to all the guys and girls who work full time for WWE and go on the road for them and to all the people who have been watching, wondering which up and coming guy will be the one to defeat Lesner.
Whatever the reason there is clearly nobody up and coming who has a chance in hell of being the one to defeat Lesner, If fans have really be waiting for that then I suggest they not really watched the current product as was the case with the Takers streak, They are all in today's WWE a special attraction so naturally will only be stopped and involved with special attractions.

If they was getting involved with the day to day roster then ok it might be able to deemed a insult but really they are operating in their own section of the WWE universe.
The_don1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 13:39
SSL2010
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 878
Goldberg is legitimately over, from a personal viewpoint I'd say give him a final title run leading up to summerslam, where he bows out and jobbers to Brock.

Or

Have Goldberg win the rumble, then at wrestlemania have Brock exact ultimate revenge by interfering and ko'ing Bill, which costs Goldberg the wwe title, then leading to a huge showdown at summerslam. While also giving Brock huge heat going into the clash.

Tbf Goldberg has no legit reason to fight Lesnar again. Unless Lesnar has a chip on his shoulder and costs him a title or rumble.
QIA 😆😆
SSL2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 14:03
dave_windows
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,354
Even if Vince was willing to have them appear they wouldn't as it would hurt their court case if they worked for WWE again even if it was only for one night.
Half the guys on that list suing Vince makes no sense like Visceras wife claiming he suffered cob cussions but because he was cremated they cant do anything.

I find that hard to believe because Vis was fat and out of shape and had Diabetes which probably is the reason he died.
dave_windows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 16:04
Lee_Smith2
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,925
If they was getting involved with the day to day roster then ok it might be able to deemed a insult but really they are operating in their own section of the WWE universe.
Lesnar has more or less squashed Rollins and Ambrose. Only Reigns was able to push Lesnar to his limits. Rusev was put his place by Goldberg a few weeks ago.

I know the entertainment industry, wrestling and WWE's business model has changed. But it still seems strange and short term thinking to push special attractions with more finese than the guys and girls out on the road. Even or maybe especially as they usually look more imposing.
Lee_Smith2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 16:16
The_don1
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7,432
Lesnar has more or less squashed Rollins and Ambrose. Only Reigns was able to push Lesnar to his limits. Rusev was put his place by Goldberg a few weeks ago.

I know the entertainment industry, wrestling and WWE's business model has changed. But it still seems strange and short term thinking to push special attractions with more finese than the guys and girls out on the road. Even or maybe especially as they usually look more imposing.
And yet those guys are still the top guys. You are not going to get harmed by losing to special attractions. Even in the old days the World Champ was really no more then a special attraction that came in and beat the top guy and left for a year or so that guy was still a top guy when they left (sometimes it even pushed them up to a new level).

Losing to a special attraction can be just as helpful as beating one
The_don1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 17:01
dave_windows
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,354
Lesnar has more or less squashed Rollins and Ambrose. Only Reigns was able to push Lesnar to his limits. Rusev was put his place by Goldberg a few weeks ago.

I know the entertainment industry, wrestling and WWE's business model has changed. But it still seems strange and short term thinking to push special attractions with more finese than the guys and girls out on the road. Even or maybe especially as they usually look more imposing.
A ton of fans loved it when The Rock squashed Punk at the Rumble.
dave_windows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 17:03
FusionFury
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 12,882
Gosh, Goldberg is going to the rumble now?

Let it go man.. you had your moment don't over egg the pudding.
FusionFury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 17:11
LeeleeSTAR
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 175
A ton of fans loved it when The Rock squashed Punk at the Rumble.
He didn't exactly squash him, they had a match that Rock won.
LeeleeSTAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 17:18
dazc
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,569
Raw was quite good great match between ko and Rollins and Owens and y2j segment was funny and zayn could be one of biggest face of all time if booked right
dazc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 22-11-2016, 17:49
BRITLAND
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 3,223
After the results I will no longer believe any of the rumours online. No Cruiserweights on SD, no IC Title on Raw, SD win the main 5v5 match, Goldberg squashes Lesnar. None of these were believed to happen before the PPV
BRITLAND is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 17:28.