• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • TV Shows: US
World Wrestling Entertainment Discussion 42 (Spoilers)
<<
<
310 of 363
>>
>
calderyon
22-11-2016
Triple H to interfere and cost Seth the championship?
calderyon
22-11-2016
2 title matches next week. Obviously trying to steal Smackdown Liveīs spotlight because of TLC being on that week.
richie4eva
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by calderyon:
“Triple H to interfere and cost Seth the championship?”

Wouldn't be surprised
James Frederick
22-11-2016
If 205 Live does well I wonder if they will add a Cruiserweight Tag Team Championship in time.

Not yet but if it's a permanent show what goes on for a few years I can see one being needed.
James Frederick
22-11-2016
Rollins will get a rematch and Jericho and Owens will get punished for disobeying Foley.
James Frederick
22-11-2016
Plus Jericho dressed as Sin Cara must be a rib after the bus fight.
JEStansfield
22-11-2016
Bill Goldberg vs Brock Lesner was the biggest insult to anyone who watches or wrestles for WWE that I've seen in a long time.

Lesner has torn through everyone for years and then in walks someone who hasn't even had a match in over a decade and they book a squash job.

Talk about two fingers up to all the guys and girls who work full time for WWE and go on the road for them and to all the people who have been watching, wondering which up and coming guy will be the one to defeat Lesner.
dave_windows
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by calderyon:
“http://www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/...esnar-rematch/

I sort of get it now. itīs bound to happen, since there is no way they would let last night be the end of this feud. No way.”

I wish this was the end of the feud.
dave_windows
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by BigBmad:
“Brock attacks Goldberg at RR leading to another match at WM.

Will be so annoyed if they actually have him win it”

That seems to be the obvious choice, Goldberg tosses Lesnar out so Brock illegally eliminates him, match at Wrestlemania and Goldberg jobs.
Harris_07
22-11-2016
If Goldberg doesn't face Lesnar at WM, who would you have them both to go up against?

I'd say:

Lesnar - Seth Rollins in a title match (they could/would mention that Lesnar has faught Rollins' Sheild brothers at the past two WMs)

Goldberg - Tricky one due to his age and possible health concerns, maybe Undertaker. Or Roman Reigns.
dave_windows
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“Demolition are part of the group of Wrestlers suing WWE so maybe WWE are doing this to take the record off them.”

I wonder if Demolition may show up one day for one night. I know Ax is suing WWE but there been too many instances WWE keep mentioning the team.
dave_windows
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by JEStansfield:
“Bill Goldberg vs Brock Lesner was the biggest insult to anyone who watches or wrestles for WWE that I've seen in a long time.”

No it isnt! Brock, Vince & Hunter all decided it.

How can it be a insult? Im sure there has been many a times when a match has gone on short.
JEStansfield
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by dave_windows:
“No it isnt! Brock, Vince & Hunter all decided it.

How can it be a insult? Im sure there has been many a times when a match has gone on short.”

Did you even bother to read the second half of what I wrote?
Hollie_Louise
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by dave_windows:
“I wonder if Demolition may show up one day for one night. I know Ax is suing WWE but there been too many instances WWE keep mentioning the team.”

They won't because they are getting sued. Vince has been known to put personal feelings aside for business (at times, not always) but I can't recall a time when he gave TV time to somebody trying to sue him. And why would they want to?

They are mentioning them because they hold a record thay an active team can beat. There will be no appearance.
James Frederick
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Hollie_Louise:
“They won't because they are getting sued. Vince has been known to put personal feelings aside for business (at times, not always) but I can't recall a time when he gave TV time to somebody trying to sue him. And why would they want to?

They are mentioning them because they hold a record thay an active team can beat. There will be no appearance.”

Even if Vince was willing to have them appear they wouldn't as it would hurt their court case if they worked for WWE again even if it was only for one night.
The_don1
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by JEStansfield:
“Bill Goldberg vs Brock Lesner was the biggest insult to anyone who watches or wrestles for WWE that I've seen in a long time.

Lesner has torn through everyone for years and then in walks someone who hasn't even had a match in over a decade and they book a squash job.

Talk about two fingers up to all the guys and girls who work full time for WWE and go on the road for them and to all the people who have been watching, wondering which up and coming guy will be the one to defeat Lesner.”

Whatever the reason there is clearly nobody up and coming who has a chance in hell of being the one to defeat Lesner, If fans have really be waiting for that then I suggest they not really watched the current product as was the case with the Takers streak, They are all in today's WWE a special attraction so naturally will only be stopped and involved with special attractions.

If they was getting involved with the day to day roster then ok it might be able to deemed a insult but really they are operating in their own section of the WWE universe.
SSL2010
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by SSL2010:
“Goldberg is legitimately over, from a personal viewpoint I'd say give him a final title run leading up to summerslam, where he bows out and jobbers to Brock.

Or

Have Goldberg win the rumble, then at wrestlemania have Brock exact ultimate revenge by interfering and ko'ing Bill, which costs Goldberg the wwe title, then leading to a huge showdown at summerslam. While also giving Brock huge heat going into the clash.

Tbf Goldberg has no legit reason to fight Lesnar again. Unless Lesnar has a chip on his shoulder and costs him a title or rumble.”

QIA 😆😆
dave_windows
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by James Frederick:
“Even if Vince was willing to have them appear they wouldn't as it would hurt their court case if they worked for WWE again even if it was only for one night.”

Half the guys on that list suing Vince makes no sense like Visceras wife claiming he suffered cob cussions but because he was cremated they cant do anything.

I find that hard to believe because Vis was fat and out of shape and had Diabetes which probably is the reason he died.
Lee_Smith2
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by The_don1:
“If they was getting involved with the day to day roster then ok it might be able to deemed a insult but really they are operating in their own section of the WWE universe.”

Lesnar has more or less squashed Rollins and Ambrose. Only Reigns was able to push Lesnar to his limits. Rusev was put his place by Goldberg a few weeks ago.

I know the entertainment industry, wrestling and WWE's business model has changed. But it still seems strange and short term thinking to push special attractions with more finese than the guys and girls out on the road. Even or maybe especially as they usually look more imposing.
The_don1
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Lee_Smith2:
“Lesnar has more or less squashed Rollins and Ambrose. Only Reigns was able to push Lesnar to his limits. Rusev was put his place by Goldberg a few weeks ago.

I know the entertainment industry, wrestling and WWE's business model has changed. But it still seems strange and short term thinking to push special attractions with more finese than the guys and girls out on the road. Even or maybe especially as they usually look more imposing.”

And yet those guys are still the top guys. You are not going to get harmed by losing to special attractions. Even in the old days the World Champ was really no more then a special attraction that came in and beat the top guy and left for a year or so that guy was still a top guy when they left (sometimes it even pushed them up to a new level).

Losing to a special attraction can be just as helpful as beating one
dave_windows
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by Lee_Smith2:
“Lesnar has more or less squashed Rollins and Ambrose. Only Reigns was able to push Lesnar to his limits. Rusev was put his place by Goldberg a few weeks ago.

I know the entertainment industry, wrestling and WWE's business model has changed. But it still seems strange and short term thinking to push special attractions with more finese than the guys and girls out on the road. Even or maybe especially as they usually look more imposing.”

A ton of fans loved it when The Rock squashed Punk at the Rumble.
FusionFury
22-11-2016
Gosh, Goldberg is going to the rumble now?

Let it go man.. you had your moment don't over egg the pudding.
LeeleeSTAR
22-11-2016
Originally Posted by dave_windows:
“A ton of fans loved it when The Rock squashed Punk at the Rumble.”

He didn't exactly squash him, they had a match that Rock won.
dazc
22-11-2016
Raw was quite good great match between ko and Rollins and Owens and y2j segment was funny and zayn could be one of biggest face of all time if booked right
BRITLAND
22-11-2016
After the results I will no longer believe any of the rumours online. No Cruiserweights on SD, no IC Title on Raw, SD win the main 5v5 match, Goldberg squashes Lesnar. None of these were believed to happen before the PPV
<<
<
310 of 363
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map