Even worse then!
World Wrestling Entertainment Discussion 42 (Spoilers)
319 of 363
Originally Posted by batdude_uk1:
“Are we really sulking about WCW on television over here?
I still have nightmares about them in Channel 5! "Wham!", "Whack!" 1960's Batman style graphics to cover up anything that might remotely be considered dangerous.”
“Are we really sulking about WCW on television over here?
I still have nightmares about them in Channel 5! "Wham!", "Whack!" 1960's Batman style graphics to cover up anything that might remotely be considered dangerous.”
Funny cos none of my posts were talking down about it. 1992 was a fantastic year you had a huge war between Heyman's team and Sting's team.
Originally Posted by Xavier Quebeck:
“Lucky git? Sorry but Paige does nothing for me. IMO, one of the worst looking Women wrestlers ever.”
“Lucky git? Sorry but Paige does nothing for me. IMO, one of the worst looking Women wrestlers ever.”
Yeah I gotta agree. Even on Total Divas she came across as a obnoxious selfish brat, no wonder Road Dogg had a go at her.
She should be grateful she even works for WWE, most wrestlers would give their arm or leg to get a foot in the door for that company. She doesnt appreciate it at all.
Originally Posted by DanielF:
“But if Joe won would there need to be a spoiler for what's basically a house show event that won't air? Sorry, it's my job to work things out - DS, don't put me on the list
”
“But if Joe won would there need to be a spoiler for what's basically a house show event that won't air? Sorry, it's my job to work things out - DS, don't put me on the list
”
Its getting silly now you cant talk about stuff that happened on a house show. I guess that means we cant talk about house show matches that happened 2 decades ago because they havent been televised. So they would be classed spoilers.
Originally Posted by dave_windows:
“Its getting silly now you cant talk about stuff that happened on a house show. I guess that means we cant talk about house show matches that happened 2 decades ago because they havent been televised. So they would be classed spoilers.”
“Its getting silly now you cant talk about stuff that happened on a house show. I guess that means we cant talk about house show matches that happened 2 decades ago because they havent been televised. So they would be classed spoilers.”
Why would anyone do that?
Also I am pretty sure you know the meaning of the word spoilers and why it's a issue
Originally Posted by dave_windows:
“Its getting silly now you cant talk about stuff that happened on a house show. I guess that means we cant talk about house show matches that happened 2 decades ago because they havent been televised. So they would be classed spoilers.”
“Its getting silly now you cant talk about stuff that happened on a house show. I guess that means we cant talk about house show matches that happened 2 decades ago because they havent been televised. So they would be classed spoilers.”
I think you have a bee in your bonnet over making the DS list. The issue isn't whether the result should be spoilered or not, that's a totally separate argument as to whether spoilering something that you wouldn't spoiler with the other result gives the game away...
Brock was back last night at a house show in Mexico against Rusev.
He hit 4 suplexes and a F5....Yawn. Even the crowd there could not care less. If they seriously don't change his move set when he returns at the Rumble then the crowd will soon boo him out of the building and not in a heel way but in a piss off boring knob head way.
He hit 4 suplexes and a F5....Yawn. Even the crowd there could not care less. If they seriously don't change his move set when he returns at the Rumble then the crowd will soon boo him out of the building and not in a heel way but in a piss off boring knob head way.
Originally Posted by DanielF:
“But if Joe won would there need to be a spoiler for what's basically a house show event that won't air? Sorry, it's my job to work things out - DS, don't put me on the list”
“But if Joe won would there need to be a spoiler for what's basically a house show event that won't air? Sorry, it's my job to work things out - DS, don't put me on the list
”
Once it has been tweeted / posted by official WWE channels then you are free to not use spoiler tags. Of course until then it should be a common courtesy to tag results as such. Remember, anyone who has two hands and can tag spoilers... has a typing chance.
Originally Posted by DS Forum Support:
“Once it has been tweeted / posted by official WWE channels then you are free to not use spoiler tags. Of course until then it should be a common courtesy to tag results as such. Remember, anyone who has two hands and can tag spoilers... has a typing chance.”
“Once it has been tweeted / posted by official WWE channels then you are free to not use spoiler tags. Of course until then it should be a common courtesy to tag results as such. Remember, anyone who has two hands and can tag spoilers... has a typing chance.”
Please see the post two above yours.
For not reading the whole thread... YOU just made the list!
Originally Posted by DanielF:
“Please see the post two above yours.
For not reading the whole thread... YOU just made the list!”
“Please see the post two above yours.
For not reading the whole thread... YOU just made the list!”
We saw that and unfortunately it's pretty unavoidable. The best way to handle that would be to maybe not label the spoiler as a NXT title spoiler, but rather just a "NXT Osaka" spoiler of whatever is relevant at the time. WWE will almost always post house show title changes shortly after they've happened anyway so the spoiler tagging period shouldn't be too long.
Anyone seen the new clip from Total Divas? Not sure what I am more shocked by, the awful acting of Lana hitting the car on ahem accident...or Jim Neidhart's huge belly!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EITQTM29OH8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EITQTM29OH8
Originally Posted by DanielF:
“I think you have a bee in your bonnet over making the DS list. The issue isn't whether the result should be spoilered or not, that's a totally separate argument as to whether spoilering something that you wouldn't spoiler with the other result gives the game away...”
“I think you have a bee in your bonnet over making the DS list. The issue isn't whether the result should be spoilered or not, that's a totally separate argument as to whether spoilering something that you wouldn't spoiler with the other result gives the game away...”
But WWE plenty of times tweets stuff that happens on house shows and such. Im sure we all cant forget that time a few years ago when they announced Angle had won a battle royale and won the title on WWE.Com with photos and then they aired it 2 days later. Fans were annoyed yes but they just have to get over it.
If they want to be genuinely suprised cut all access from the internet and then you wont have a problem.
Originally Posted by stu64:
“Brock was back last night at a house show in Mexico against Rusev.
He hit 4 suplexes and a F5....Yawn. Even the crowd there could not care less. If they seriously don't change his move set when he returns at the Rumble then the crowd will soon boo him out of the building and not in a heel way but in a piss off boring knob head way.”
“Brock was back last night at a house show in Mexico against Rusev.
He hit 4 suplexes and a F5....Yawn. Even the crowd there could not care less. If they seriously don't change his move set when he returns at the Rumble then the crowd will soon boo him out of the building and not in a heel way but in a piss off boring knob head way.”
HEY! Thats a spoiler!
I was planning on watching that when WWE shows part of the match during the upcoming weekend and now you ve ruined it for me!
Originally Posted by dave_windows:
“HEY! Thats a spoiler!
I was planning on watching that when WWE shows part of the match during the upcoming weekend and now you ve ruined it for me!”
“HEY! Thats a spoiler!
I was planning on watching that when WWE shows part of the match during the upcoming weekend and now you ve ruined it for me!”
Wise up
I honestly had no idea it was a SD PPV tonight and looking at the card it yet again looks very similar to the previous SD PPV's cards. Shows how thin they are on the roster on SD.
Originally Posted by dave_windows:
“HEY! Thats a spoiler!
I was planning on watching that when WWE shows part of the match during the upcoming weekend and now you ve ruined it for me!”
“HEY! Thats a spoiler!
I was planning on watching that when WWE shows part of the match during the upcoming weekend and now you ve ruined it for me!”
Stay out the thread if you want to avoid spoilers then.
Morning. First time watching wrestling on my new TV. Jesus, the ring looks tiny!
Hoping for a clean sweep for heels!
Hoping for a clean sweep for heels!
Point, another lost bonus though
On the plus side, correct booking decision, here's hoping that continues
On the plus side, correct booking decision, here's hoping that continues
319 of 363
