|
||||||||
World Wrestling Entertainment Discussion 42 (Spoilers) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1101 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,929
|
Speaking of ratings, I never knew WCW used to regularly beat WWE's cable ratings well before the debut of Nitro. Furthermore, I didn't know that when Bischoff brought in Hogan and a bunch of other 80s wrestlers that ratings dropped. Though PPV buys obviously increased. The things you learn from reading old copies of Wrestling Observer.
From watching Russo Era Nitro, which might as well have been branded Extreme Attitude, it's easy to see why ratings declined so much, yet remained steady compared to the Rhodes/Nash and Sullivan Eras. It was a foolish mistake trying to copy what WWE had made their own style. Amongst the chaos, there's some really good overlooked stuff from this time. Surprised they never signed Vampiro or gave Shane Douglas another chance back in 2001. |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#1102 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 966
|
Quote:
I think you might be onto something James the Internet wasnt big in 1999 as it is now therefore and I dont wanna point fingers BTW but I think Hazys a liar.
Wrestling message boards were a big deal in '99 and before. Except then, there was actually interesting stuff (and three promotions) to talk about
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1103 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Burton upon Trent
Posts: 1,929
|
I've been using Internet message boards since 1996 when they first took off, mailing lists since 1993 and Bulletin Boards since 1987. Now that's established me as all knowing... Hazy, you're an idiot.
1999? Bless. Of course to keep this on track, that was when E-Feds had taken off. Anyone else old enough to remember them? I was EWF Champion
|
|
|
|
|
#1104 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: London
Posts: 23,152
|
Quote:
it been confirmed that
Spoiler
|
|
|
|
|
#1105 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Posts: 16,709
|
Quote:
Really excited about this.
As mentioned several times, I'd wait to see what happens on Sunday morning..... |
|
|
|
|
#1106 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,371
|
I feel bad for Banks, she'll probably win the title in her first singles match on PPV against Charlotte, and then lose the belt against Bayley at Summerslam.
Id love her to get a 6 month run with the belt like she should have got at mania but with this draft thing happening im betting Bayley will go right into the title picture. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1107 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,569
|
Quote:
I feel bad for Banks, she'll probably win the title in her first singles match on PPV against Charlotte, and then lose the belt against Bayley at Summerslam.
Id love her to get a 6 month run with the belt like she should have got at mania but with this draft thing happening im betting Bayley will go right into the title picture. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1108 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 37,008
|
Quote:
I think sasha will title at summerslam and Bayley will face aska at takeover and if I was wwe I would have sasha vs Bayley at mania
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1109 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,371
|
NXT always shows why their matches are miles better than the current WWE product each week.
Alexa Bliss must be the most overratted Diva in NXT. Over the past few weeks it seems like every Diva has jobbed to her when some of the people that lost to her obviously deserved the win. Well until Bayley beat her. Not sure what everyone here thinks of Bliss but I dont think she deserves the push shes getting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1110 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,371
|
Quote:
Speaking of ratings, I never knew WCW used to regularly beat WWE's cable ratings well before the debut of Nitro. Furthermore, I didn't know that when Bischoff brought in Hogan and a bunch of other 80s wrestlers that ratings dropped. Though PPV buys obviously increased. The things you learn from reading old copies of Wrestling Observer.
From watching Russo Era Nitro, which might as well have been branded Extreme Attitude, it's easy to see why ratings declined so much, yet remained steady compared to the Rhodes/Nash and Sullivan Eras. It was a foolish mistake trying to copy what WWE had made their own style. Amongst the chaos, there's some really good overlooked stuff from this time. Surprised they never signed Vampiro or gave Shane Douglas another chance back in 2001. At the time everyone thought McMahon sent Russo to WCW to kill the company. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1111 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,371
|
Quote:
it been confirmed that randy orton will face brock lesnar at summerslam
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1112 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7,434
|
Quote:
WWE wasted a good opportunity on this. They should have had some sort of altercation on Raw where Brock says no one wants to face him then Orton shows up thus confirming the match.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1113 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,700
|
That's good WWE thinks he's gonna pass his drug test. Good for them lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1114 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,403
|
Quote:
Apart from the fact that Lesner is quite busy at the moment and the cost of appearing of Raw would be a waste of money for something they could just announce like they have done with the same outcome
Why do you watch wrestling? To be entertained, surely? So WHY would you defend a huge, first-time match like Orton/Lesnar being announced in the way it was, as opposed to being given a proper storyline build-up and feud? "The outcome will be the same" and "It will save them money" are the sort of arguments the businessmen and women behind WWE should be making, NOT THE FANS! |
|
|
|
|
|
#1115 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7,434
|
Quote:
I'm not getting at you personally but this logic baffles me. Absolutely BAFFLES me.
Why do you watch wrestling? To be entertained, surely? So WHY would you defend a huge, first-time match like Orton/Lesnar being announced in the way it was, as opposed to being given a proper storyline build-up and feud? "The outcome will be the same" and "It will save them money" are the sort of arguments the businessmen and women behind WWE should be making, NOT THE FANS! Lesner is busy at the moment preparing for a major non WWE event and its not logical that he would take time away from preparing for it just to make an appearance such as suggested. Lesner also has a contract which is very costly to the WWE (according to reports) and again it makes very little logic for the WWE to pay out such a cost for again such an appearance. Just because something is entertaining is not enough to ignore the facts of the situation. While we want to be entertained that should not mean we ignore the realities of the situation and the reasoning behind the decision. Even as fans we should not be ignoring the business aspect of it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1116 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,403
|
Quote:
While yes Lesner making a appearance is good entertainment is not reason enough to ignore the logic behind them going down this route.
Lesner is busy at the moment preparing for a major non WWE event and its not logical that he would take time away from preparing for it just to make an appearance such as suggested. Lesner also has a contract which is very costly to the WWE (according to reports) and again it makes very little logic for the WWE to pay out such a cost for again such an appearance. Just because something is entertaining is not enough to ignore the facts of the situation. While we want to be entertained that should not mean we ignore the realities of the situation and the reasoning behind the decision. Even as fans we should not be ignoring the business aspect of it. Too many fans are obsessed with the business side of things, to the extent that they are able to - in your case - gloss over and justify an absolutely terrible creative decision. I don't care about the business side of things. I care about the creative side and the creative side only. If WWE doesn't entertain me, I don't watch it. And that largely explains why I haven't watched it since Extreme Rules. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1117 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7,434
|
Quote:
I cannot vehemently disagree enough.
Too many fans are obsessed with the business side of things, to the extent that they are able to - in your case - gloss over and justify an absolutely terrible creative decision. I don't care about the business side of things. I care about the creative side and the creative side only. If WWE doesn't entertain me, I don't watch it. And that largely explains why I haven't watched it since Extreme Rules. What we wants as fans surely has to be based somewhere in reality? Some fans might want Hogan to come back in reality that is not going to happen, Some fans might want the PG rating to end again that is not going to happen. There was no way Lesner was going to make an appearance so it was either go down this route or not have the match or maybe go down the route of Randy coming out on Raw and challenging him. With them wanting to push Smackdown you can see why they wanted to use Smackdown as the way of getting the announcement out there. Caring about the creative aspect is great but is pointless if you don't at least base creative decisions in reality |
|
|
|
|
|
#1118 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 3,731
|
Quote:
How old were you in 1999?? The web was already huge. Freeserve started in 1998 for crying out loud!
Wrestling message boards were a big deal in '99 and before. Except then, there was actually interesting stuff (and three promotions) to talk about ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1119 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,929
|
Quote:
I was always under the assumption that reason ratings dropped was because The New Blood sucked, a terrible group and no one wanted Jeff Jarrett or Scott Steiner as World Champion.
At the time everyone thought McMahon sent Russo to WCW to kill the company. The build up of making Jarrett, Booker T and Scott Steiner actual headliners is decent enough. The balsa guitar shots made Jarrett seem even more midcard - it doesn't work when Triple H (his heel rival) was using a sledgehammer. They totally screwed up Goldberg's money making potential back then though, not so much with the heel turn but how they handled his character afterwards. No wonder he hates Russo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1120 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Manchester
Posts: 3,178
|
Poor UFC fans, with Lesnar now headlining UFC 200 that means that a fake WWE guy has headlined their two biggest PPV events in history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1121 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,371
|
Quote:
Looking at it today, a lot of it is way ahead of its time. 16 years ago and with a WWE at its best it would be confusing to most of the audience. From a booking standpoint it's bad because the PPVs aren't appealing and the New Blood only really served to make Hogan, Nash, Flair, Sting etc seem even more important. From a TV standpoint it's entertaining and more logical than I expected.
The build up of making Jarrett, Booker T and Scott Steiner actual headliners is decent enough. The balsa guitar shots made Jarrett seem even more midcard - it doesn't work when Triple H (his heel rival) was using a sledgehammer. They totally screwed up Goldberg's money making potential back then though, not so much with the heel turn but how they handled his character afterwards. No wonder he hates Russo. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ssrfZyTK_Tw I liked how WCW built up Booker T but not so much Scott or Jeff. Is it really 16 years ago? Blimey seems only like yesterday when they closed. Mind you even 16 years now Ive no idea what they were smoking when they did that Mean Gene Okerlund goes old school on the New Blood. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1122 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,371
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WrestlingObserver
WWE is reportedly interested in bringing back Curt Hawkins and Jimmy Wang Yang. Wang was backstage at Monday's RAW and teased something big coming up on Twitter. He also posted a photo from backstage at RAW, outside of Vince McMahon's office, and said he was waiting on his meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1123 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,569
|
Watching smackdown Owens is amazing and why they don't said who Brock will face at summerslam
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1124 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
Posts: 16,709
|
Quote:
Watching smackdown Owens is amazing and why they don't said who Brock will face at summerslam
|
|
|
|
|
#1125 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,569
|
[quote=JCR;83080119]They announced Brock/Orton on Canadian tv, not Smackdown.[/QUOT
Yes I know on raw they said they would announce it on smackdown but according to Dave meltzer it was not edited on to the Canada or uk version of smackdown which is weird |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:34.




