Hopefully his tweets will be brought up in the house.

Winston's opinions were used against him so Surely Andrew should be treated the same way? Assuming the producers still care about consistency that is...

Andrew isn't a 50 something, short, ugly dude. He will have a female fanbase (which means votes, which means profit for BB), and as such absolutely nothing will be mentioned by BB or their associates about it. The only ways he would be kicked out of BB is if he was old with no fanbase at all (therefore no profit in phone votes), or if he was a female.

Andrew isn't attractive enough to be protected by them. He's only average.

If the posts or tweets aren't there people can't dig anything up but nice attempt at making out like Andrew is a victim as opposed to a nasty bigoted pillock.

Sorry wrong; I'm not making Andrew out to be a victim at all, I've already dissed him for being an idiot up thread!

Well that post I replied to came across that way but if I misread your intentions then apologies

Bigots are the new victims these days. It's the PC gawn mad brigade what done it.

I keep getting called an 'SJW' yet I don't even live in southwest London.

Yes I appreciate it may have sounded like that, but definitely not supporting this person at all. Just that it is normal for some people to google the HM's and to see what info they can find; happens every year. Good on them, saves me doing it.

Yes that's my mistake then..I totally misread your post

I hope they read his tweets out in the house

Happy to find there's both an Andrew & an Andy in there and they are in fact two different people. I liked Andy instantly, but that Andrew guy put my teeth on edge. Sour faced trout. Then he opened his mouth and now these tweets... horrible stuff.

In some ways I want him to be removed, but I sorta think backwards morons should be given enough airtime to prove to the masses how truly repulsive they are without being preemptively silenced. Public humiliation is quite powerful.

Then again, If he's kept in it will be tough to look at his sour mug all the time.

They wont eject him they will make him a producer.

No problem, I could have worded it better

Yes I'm sure they will read out the tweets. That is going to be some good viewing when it happens.

And for the person that says that he's not a 50 year old, short ugly etc, well he's not that attractive either; in fact he looks very dour and miserable. Not sure whether BB will go out of their way to try and save him tbh.

Someone out there among the slummy mummy voters will fancy him. They fancied Conor remember, and he was fugly.

Trust me, if the alternative is bigotry then It's better to be be a social justice warrior. That's the way I see it anyway.

Most of us SJWs don't even campaign for justice or even start petitions but that doesn't seem to occur to our detractors.

Ditto!!

The alternative isn't bigotry though. That's the thing.

I can't stand SJW and i'm no bigot which means there is a third option. The tolerant and patient option that is able to allow more paths than that of their own realizing that time has no master and all things succumb to time in the end.

---The SJW in general, not everyone... in general from what i've seen is basically something along similar lines of a bully who's agenda is to force everything into how they want it/and how they see things within a sort of mob mentality.

---The ignorant ones are simply misguided.

---Then there's the third. Humble. Not going to force anything and are more internal in patience and understanding of perspective, time and the bigger picture.

I choose the third.

Yes, but the term SJW gets thrown around so liberally these days.

If someone displays a hint of compassion or empathy, or an interest in human rights or equality, then watch how they get called an SJW.

That and not everyone is the same as those more extremist types. I just can't stand those more extreme sjws who gang up and try and force everything to be how they want it... until people apologize, until certain things are removed or changed. I don't like that forceful style. Having certain views/opinions is one thing. Forcing everything to be one way is another entirely. I realize not everyone is that extreme with it though.

In my experience Social Justice Warriors don't actually exist. It is just a term of abuse thrown at liberals.

Oh, they exist alright. Look at the numerous apologies people have made within various art forms due to their aggressive and forceful agenda within mob mentality. Within art! By the stars! Something that shouldn't be censored or forced to be anything other than art by anyone, and people are apologizing and changing things/censoring/removing because of this group of misguided zealots. It's a plague on comics, the series format, music and movies... in all kinds of advertising. it's everywhere except where it's most needed. These people are busy attacking and tearing down art and expression rather than actually making a difference in the world. A completely misguided group of people.

If someone wants to help abused women for example. Forcing a billboard depicting a villain choking a female superhero to be removed probably isn't anything near as good as helping at shelters and support groups where those abused women could really use the help but that would actually require effort and be difficult as most real change is quite difficult... not just typing on a keyboard with the group and harassing people until they apologize or remove the thing from the comfort of their chair.

They even turned on Joss Whedon over their own foolishness in things they didn't even understand and harassed him which is unforgivable to turn on such a great and amazing person.

I for one will never support or bend to their ways.

Well, SJWs have their own words that they love to liberally throw around, such as bigot, racist etc. Which is why you can't debate with an SJW because they are right and everyone else is a bigot, end of.
Also worth remembering that a large number of people that have issues with SJWs are in fact from the left themselves. The rational, non regressive part of the left that is.

Daily Star front page
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ckie5rQWsAAJ3Hf.jpg

Proper oddball, that one.

They exist, but they amount to about 2% of all people who actually get accused of being SJWs.