Originally Posted by batdude_uk1:
“How on earth can you accuse me of bias over calling out a player elbowing someone in the throat region??
There is no bias there in saying that was a foul, and should have been a penalty, and a red card, as no matter who the player is, that is what should have happened.
Only those that are defending him and his actions are showing bias.”
Let's have a reminder of what you posted...
Quote:
“Skrtel defending as he usually does, with no actual idea of how to defend, and just being a thug.”
Totally OTT, attacking the player rather than just commenting on the incident. You've contradicted yourself. Yet again.
Not many are defending the player over the incidents in question - they're just rightly objecting to the portrayal of Skrtel generally as "a thug".
The fact he's constantly bullied by physical strikers in the PL is further proof that he's simply a rash, average defender.