Hoping its Vote to Save this series, as last year proved, the public can't be trusted and all the big characters will leave first
Is it Vote To Evict or Vote To Save?
Hopefully vote to evict. If people like Marco, Laura and Natalie stay because they're deemed "big characters" then I'm gonna struggle more than usual with this series.
They will choose whatever voting method keeps the more controversial characters in for the longest. Otherwise, they will choose an eviction 'twist' for the same reason.
Originally Posted by danielleh:
“Hopefully vote to evict. If people like Marco, Laura and Natalie stay because they're deemed "big characters" then I'm gonna struggle more than usual with this series.”
“Hopefully vote to evict. If people like Marco, Laura and Natalie stay because they're deemed "big characters" then I'm gonna struggle more than usual with this series.”
I think every single series should be positive voting. Its only moronic Ben Frow whoinsists on evict.
However this series I really could not care less as they all seem to be utterly loathesome and its only on for 8 weeks is it ? Therefore losing characters out of 18 housemates should not make much impact.
And besides I think people like Marco Laura and Chelsea will be going no matter what the voting method was ! Just no redeeming qualities whatsoever
If it's a Vote To Evict then expect twist after twist every bloody week as otherwise all the big characters such as Laura, Marco, Natalie etc will be gone, and we know they'll never let that happen.
Originally Posted by bb2011fan:
“Hoping its Vote to Save this series, as last year proved, the public can't be trusted and all the big characters will leave first”
“Hoping its Vote to Save this series, as last year proved, the public can't be trusted and all the big characters will leave first”
Oh god not this again! It doesn't make any difference, despite the pseudo scientific analyses that has pervaded this forum. There was vote to save on the first BB on Channel five. The strong and divisive characters still went early.
Originally Posted by GibsonSG:
“Oh god not this again! It doesn't make any difference, despite the pseudo scientific analyses that has pervaded this forum. There was vote to save on the first BB on Channel five. The strong and divisive characters still went early.”
“Oh god not this again! It doesn't make any difference, despite the pseudo scientific analyses that has pervaded this forum. There was vote to save on the first BB on Channel five. The strong and divisive characters still went early.”
It does make a difference as has been proved many times. If it's only two housemates up for eviction, then no it doesn't make any difference. But only two up never happens anymore anyway. If there's three or more though then it does make a difference. It should always be Vote To Save.
Originally Posted by Master Ozzy:
“It does make a difference as has been proved many times. If it's only two housemates up for eviction, then no it doesn't make any difference. But only two up never happens anymore anyway. If there's three or more though then it does make a difference. It should always be Vote To Save.”
“It does make a difference as has been proved many times. If it's only two housemates up for eviction, then no it doesn't make any difference. But only two up never happens anymore anyway. If there's three or more though then it does make a difference. It should always be Vote To Save.”
It has never been proved or made a difference. In any case you can't prove it unless both voting systems ran next to each other. The fact is that the strong characters go first.
Originally Posted by dog_eat_dog:
“They will choose whatever voting method keeps the more controversial characters in for the longest. Otherwise, they will choose an eviction 'twist' for the same reason.”
“They will choose whatever voting method keeps the more controversial characters in for the longest. Otherwise, they will choose an eviction 'twist' for the same reason.”
Yep, if somebody they want to keep in the house is up, they will change the rules to keep them in.
