• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Email back from c5
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
iwholden
13-06-2016
I wrote to C5 asking why Tila Tequila was ejected because of her comments but yet Andrew hasn't been? (I kinda like Andrew and don't want him out - I wrote out of curiosity)

I had an email back today and it made me laugh & I had to share:

" Thank you for your recent enquiry regarding Big Brother.



As Andrew is an active participant at this time, it is neither possible nor appropriate for him to be asked to deal with these allegations. It would be unfair on Andrew if this were to happen. Part of the format of Big Brother involves participants being cut off from the outside world and interacting only with themselves or guests approved by the producers. In the ordinary course, housemates are not required to account for their past behaviour, actual or alleged. Rightly, the production team's concerns are about the behaviour exhibited and the language used by housemates whilst in the house.



In the case of Andrew, extensive checks of his social media activity were undertaken prior to his entry in the House and subsequent to the allegations about the tweets said to have been posted on his account. The tweets which have been the subject of publicity were not located on either occasion. At the moment, Channel 5 and Big Brother are not aware that there is any proof that Andrew posted the offensive tweets in question. Without such proof, it would be unfair and inappropriate to condemn Andrew.



Yours sincerely





Ian

VIEWER ADVISOR"



As I said earlier I don't want him out I just wanted them to tell me why it was okay.. anyway seems like one rule for one.
nattoyaki
13-06-2016
The honest answer is that Tila was used for publicity, Winston was too (though more for a bit of drama) and at this point there's enough of both around the show that they don't need to.

So many lies in this email it's crazy.

<edit> Plus at this point in time he's one of the few who looks like he might shake things up further.
Melax
13-06-2016
Whereas if you are a minor cast member you will be removed immediately without any checks being made. No smoke without fire and all that.
So basically, "we looked at the last two tweets he made, and found nothing wrong. Anyway he was probably hacked".

Marco seems to be one of their major cast members this year. I'm hoping he says something racist just so we can see BB do nothing at all about it.
He's already slapped a female's backside really hard and held her by the throat, an act that got a minor, black cast member removed once upon a time.
Nicho
13-06-2016
Originally Posted by Melax:
“Whereas if you are a minor cast member you will be removed immediately without any checks being made. No smoke without fire and all that.
So basically, "we looked at the last two tweets he made, and found nothing wrong. Anyway he was probably hacked".

Marco seems to be one of their major cast members this year. I'm hoping he says something racist just so we can see BB do nothing at all about it.
He's already slapped a female's backside really hard and held her by the throat, an act that got a minor, black cast member removed once upon a time.”

\\


If Marco says something racist, they simply won't show it, and so won't have to do anything about it.
Dave_62
13-06-2016
The offensive tweets are a bit more complicated because Andrew is black and they can't kick him out for just being horrible. Wasn't Tila accused of being anti semitic? If she was a jew and posted what she did, then she would have stayed.
Groundhogal
13-06-2016
"Part of the format of Big Brother involves participants being cut off from the outside world and interacting only with themselves or guests approved by the producers."

Did they seriously say that?
I suppose the advantage of emails is, you don't have to struggle to keep a straight face when you're taking the piss.
Dave_62
13-06-2016
Originally Posted by Melax:
“Whereas if you are a minor cast member you will be removed immediately without any checks being made. No smoke without fire and all that.
So basically, "we looked at the last two tweets he made, and found nothing wrong. Anyway he was probably hacked".

Marco seems to be one of their major cast members this year. I'm hoping he says something racist just so we can see BB do nothing at all about it.
He's already slapped a female's backside really hard and held her by the throat, an act that got a minor, black cast member removed once upon a time.”

Was that consensual as Marcos is.

I agree with the rest though and can see him saying something he thinks is 'urban' and is racist but gets away with it.
lubo 25
13-06-2016
Originally Posted by iwholden:
“I wrote to C5 asking why Tila Tequila was ejected because of her comments but yet Andrew hasn't been? (I kinda like Andrew and don't want him out - I wrote out of curiosity)

I had an email back today and it made me laugh & I had to share:

" Thank you for your recent enquiry regarding Big Brother.



As Andrew is an active participant at this time, it is neither possible nor appropriate for him to be asked to deal with these allegations. It would be unfair on Andrew if this were to happen. Part of the format of Big Brother involves participants being cut off from the outside world and interacting only with themselves or guests approved by the producers. In the ordinary course, housemates are not required to account for their past behaviour, actual or alleged. Rightly, the production team's concerns are about the behaviour exhibited and the language used by housemates whilst in the house.



In the case of Andrew, extensive checks of his social media activity were undertaken prior to his entry in the House and subsequent to the allegations about the tweets said to have been posted on his account. The tweets which have been the subject of publicity were not located on either occasion. At the moment, Channel 5 and Big Brother are not aware that there is any proof that Andrew posted the offensive tweets in question. Without such proof, it would be unfair and inappropriate to condemn Andrew.



Yours sincerely





Ian

VIEWER ADVISOR"



As I said earlier I don't want him out I just wanted them to tell me why it was okay.. anyway seems like one rule for one.”




Get a life for goodness sake, it's only a tv show
Dix
13-06-2016
Originally Posted by Dave_62:
“Was that consensual as Marcos is.

I agree with the rest though and can see him saying something he thinks is 'urban' and is racist but gets away with it.”

But in the real world, he wouldn't get away with it, as the Law against Racism can be used.
Dix
13-06-2016
Originally Posted by lubo 25:
“Get a life for goodness sake, it's only a tv show”

But real people take part in it and are under same law as the rest of us.
iwholden
13-06-2016
Originally Posted by lubo 25:
“Get a life for goodness sake, it's only a tv show”

As I stated, I only wrote it to out of curiosity! I'm not one of the ofcom complainers. Anyway thanks for the rude comment
nattoyaki
13-06-2016
Originally Posted by lubo 25:
“Get a life for goodness sake, it's only a tv show”

Um, I think you may be on the wrong website
fisch
13-06-2016
Wow your email worked he is gone Could you e mail about Marco next??
Lushness
13-06-2016
Dang OP, YOU are to blame for Andrew's removal!
iwholden
13-06-2016
Has he really gone?? Gutted if so!! I liked him!
theia
13-06-2016
Originally Posted by fisch:
“Wow your email worked he is gone Could you e mail about Marco next??”


Very good
iwholden
13-06-2016
Just seen! I hope that was nothing to do with me.. surely it can't be!
fisch
13-06-2016
Originally Posted by iwholden:
“Has he really gone?? Gutted if so!! I liked him!”

Bit late now Your work is done Well done
TVScanner99
13-06-2016
I'm blaming you for Andrew's removal. If this series turns to shit, it's your fault.
lou_123
13-06-2016
sorcha_healy27
13-06-2016
I doubt it's due to the tweets. I imagine something went down in there.
iwholden
13-06-2016
Originally Posted by TVScanner99:
“I'm blaming you for Andrew's removal. If this series turns to shit, it's your fault.”

I'm genuinely in shock. I can't have supplied that information. Surely they already knew!

My intention was not to have him removed I just wanted an explanation.
erin_p
13-06-2016
Very odd the email is defending Andrew being in the house and today he is removed .
fisch
13-06-2016
Originally Posted by iwholden:
“I'm genuinely in shock. I can't have supplied that information. Surely they already knew!

My intention was not to have him removed I just wanted an explanation.”

Relax There is no way they would act on 1 email
KT_Dog
13-06-2016
Originally Posted by iwholden:
“I'm genuinely in shock. I can't have supplied that information. Surely they already knew!

My intention was not to have him removed I just wanted an explanation.”

Your an OTHER!!! ...the game really has changed...
<<
<
1 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map