I wrote to C5 asking why Tila Tequila was ejected because of her comments but yet Andrew hasn't been? (I kinda like Andrew and don't want him out - I wrote out of curiosity)
I had an email back today and it made me laugh & I had to share:
" Thank you for your recent enquiry regarding Big Brother.
As Andrew is an active participant at this time, it is neither possible nor appropriate for him to be asked to deal with these allegations. It would be unfair on Andrew if this were to happen. Part of the format of Big Brother involves participants being cut off from the outside world and interacting only with themselves or guests approved by the producers. In the ordinary course, housemates are not required to account for their past behaviour, actual or alleged. Rightly, the production team's concerns are about the behaviour exhibited and the language used by housemates whilst in the house.
In the case of Andrew, extensive checks of his social media activity were undertaken prior to his entry in the House and subsequent to the allegations about the tweets said to have been posted on his account. The tweets which have been the subject of publicity were not located on either occasion. At the moment, Channel 5 and Big Brother are not aware that there is any proof that Andrew posted the offensive tweets in question. Without such proof, it would be unfair and inappropriate to condemn Andrew.
Yours sincerely
Ian
VIEWER ADVISOR"
As I said earlier I don't want him out I just wanted them to tell me why it was okay.. anyway seems like one rule for one.
I had an email back today and it made me laugh & I had to share:
" Thank you for your recent enquiry regarding Big Brother.
As Andrew is an active participant at this time, it is neither possible nor appropriate for him to be asked to deal with these allegations. It would be unfair on Andrew if this were to happen. Part of the format of Big Brother involves participants being cut off from the outside world and interacting only with themselves or guests approved by the producers. In the ordinary course, housemates are not required to account for their past behaviour, actual or alleged. Rightly, the production team's concerns are about the behaviour exhibited and the language used by housemates whilst in the house.
In the case of Andrew, extensive checks of his social media activity were undertaken prior to his entry in the House and subsequent to the allegations about the tweets said to have been posted on his account. The tweets which have been the subject of publicity were not located on either occasion. At the moment, Channel 5 and Big Brother are not aware that there is any proof that Andrew posted the offensive tweets in question. Without such proof, it would be unfair and inappropriate to condemn Andrew.
Yours sincerely
Ian
VIEWER ADVISOR"
As I said earlier I don't want him out I just wanted them to tell me why it was okay.. anyway seems like one rule for one.



