• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Do you really think BB will let Marco go?
<<
<
2 of 3
>>
>
StevieR
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by KT_Dog:
“You've seen editing of Marco in a good light? Where?”

The producers think that Marco is king and they believe the viewers think the same. To them, everything Marco does is good tv, it's generating a buzz on social media (albeit for the wrong reasons!) he's generating publicity for a show that's dying a slow death.

I, along with the the majority of viewers, find Marco really creepy, dirty, annoying, child like, dangerously unpredictable etc. The producers don't see that side of Marco or they do, but because of his dad, his name and the publicity, they'll want to keep him in
george.millman
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by KT_Dog:
“ Brilliant!! They'll call it 'Operation Borehamwood' - a crack team will be assembled, every county will be involved. They'll liaise with the homeland security, the CIA and FBI, doors will be kicked in up and down the country...”

I don't mean quite to that extreme, but seriously this is taken as a major issue by television standards boards.
george.millman
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by StevieR:
“The producers think that Marco is king and they believe the viewers think the same. To them, everything Marco does is good tv, it's generating a buzz on social media (albeit for the wrong reasons!) he's generating publicity for a show that's dying a slow death.

I, along with the the majority of viewers, find Marco really creepy, dirty, annoying, child like, dangerously unpredictable etc. The producers don't see that side of Marco or they do, but because of his dad, his name and the publicity, they'll want to keep him in”

If they think the viewers love him so much, surely they wouldn't care about him being up for eviction because they wouldn't expect anyone to vote against him.
Annsyre
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by Etty_Dee:
“Who knows how far BB execs will bend the rules, seems they can do anything they want.”

They cannot break the law.
who, me?
17-06-2016
I wouldn't be so sure that Marco's definitely going to go. Historically, viewers tend to vote for a girl to go and I wouldn't be at all surprised if Emma left.
Freddie4PM
17-06-2016
I would imagine that at least some of the backroom team want him gone for being more trouble than he's worth, whilst others will want to keep him in as a ratings/publicity winner. Maybe that's what they were arguing about during the long pauses when he was in the diary room on the live task reveal show, debating whether or not to send him in to the other house.
KT_Dog
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by StevieR:
“The producers think that Marco is king and they believe the viewers think the same.”

Genuinely dont know where your getting this from
cavalli
17-06-2016
If Emma doesn't get the boot I may flounce
Freddie4PM
17-06-2016
They might be able to save him by reducing it to two, with Andy and one other being told that they are safe and the lines left open, I'm sure they'd love a Georgina v Marco showdown, Georgina v Emma would be even better but they'd need to completely ignore Marco in tonight's highlights and have some Georgina and Emma footage that paints both in a bad light for that to happen.
Jack_White6
17-06-2016
Well if they want to keep ratings up they need to get rid of the bores, Macro is not a bore.

This show will be dead if Marco goes tonight.
Jean_Daniels
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by Jack_White6:
“Well if they want to keep ratings up they need to get rid of the bores, Macro is not a bore.

This show will be dead if Marco goes tonight.”

the show is dead anyway
Annsyre
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by Jack_White6:
“Well if they want to keep ratings up they need to get rid of the bores, Macro is not a bore.

This show will be dead if Marco goes tonight.”

Not it wont, once domineering Marco has gone they can relax and enjoy themselves.
Cheetah666
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by Jack_White6:
“Well if they want to keep ratings up they need to get rid of the bores, Macro is not a bore.

This show will be dead if Marco goes tonight.”

Marco is a bore, he's ruining the programme for alot of us. I hope he goes asap.
richie4eva
17-06-2016
If he does go, they'll bring him back as a guest for a task

They won't risk a backlash bringing him back to win as they won't want another Nikki type s**tstorm

He's only got himself to blame for being on the block and potentially going tonight, the guy is off his rocker and if he doesn't go tonight it's more than likely he will be removed sooner rather than later as he is a loose cannon

Besides can you imagine what him and Laura will do to 'celebrate' IF he stays tonght, doesn't bear thinking about
InMyArms
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by george.millman:
“If they were going to bring in a twist to let him stay, they would have already done it as they did with Helen and Marc.

They may mess with the format to a frustrating degree, but this is the one thing they can't change. Once people are up for eviction and the viewing public are voting, they are legally obliged to stick to the rules as laid out from the start. If people spent money on evicting Marco and he had more votes than anyone else, ignoring the public and keeping him in would be fraud. If that came out, it would result in a huge nationwide investigation and the backlash resulting from that would not only lead to the end of Big Brother, but probably all UK TV shows involving a public vote. (In 2007, there was a scandal involving a quiz show called BrainTeaser (also on Channel 5) where it turned out that on a couple of occasions they hadn't announced a proper winner for the viewer competitions and just had the voice of a member of the production team claiming to be a winner. As a result, there is hardly anything that has a phone-in viewer competition anymore - nearly every game show featuring one cancelled that element, just in case anything similar ever went wrong.)

The BB production team may be misguided at times, but not even they are as stupid as that.”

Did you miss my post?
Originally Posted by InMyArms:
“They'll do whatever they feel like at the time, anyone remember Winston's eviction from CBB where, without announcing it before lines closed, they decided that the housemates would decide who goes between the bottom two? An absolute joke, and entirely unethical when people are paying 50p a go to vote. IMO that was more scandalous than anything Channel 4 did - including bringing back Nikki. At least when Nikki was voted out she actually got evicted.

If they don't like how it is going they will plan something to get their way.”

erin_p
17-06-2016
If BB don't meddle then yes he should go ...the guy is not liked. Tonight's editing will be telling.
James Frederick
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by Jack_White6:
“Well if they want to keep ratings up they need to get rid of the bores, Macro is not a bore.

This show will be dead if Marco goes tonight.”

Hevis a bore he does the exact same thing day after day.

They could show a repeat of what he did the day before and nobody would notice.

The reason I stopped watching was he was boring me.
Freddie4PM
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by InMyArms:
“
They'll do whatever they feel like at the time, anyone remember Winston's eviction from CBB where, without announcing it before lines closed, they decided that the housemates would decide who goes between the bottom two? An absolute joke, and entirely unethical when people are paying 50p a go to vote. IMO that was more scandalous than anything Channel 4 did - including bringing back Nikki. At least when Nikki was voted out she actually got evicted.

If they don't like how it is going they will plan something to get their way.
”

I wouldn't be surprised if they reduced it to two on the public vote, then let 'The others' decide who gets evicted, relying on Chelsea to beat down anybody who suggests they go for Marco.
alter_ego_cat
17-06-2016
[quote=InMyArms;82781043]They'll do whatever they feel like at the time, anyone remember Winston's eviction from CBB where, without announcing it before lines closed, they decided that the housemates would decide who goes between the bottom two? An absolute joke, and entirely unethical when people are paying 50p a go to vote. IMO that was more scandalous than anything Channel 4 did - including bringing back Nikki. At least when Nikki was voted out she actually got evicted.

If they don't like how it is going they will plan something to get their way.


Was that a vote to evict or a vote to save though - if it was vote to save that may have given them a bit of a loophole.
Cornchips
17-06-2016
have the lines opened? If yes he will go if he gets most votes. He is the sort that will walk anyway. He won't make it to the end. Once things start getting serious in there he will throw his toys out and stomp out
All_seeing_eye
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by KT_Dog:
“You've seen editing of Marco in a good light? Where?”

I'd like to see it also.

#evictmarco
bluegroper
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by Jack_White6:
“Well if they want to keep ratings up they need to get rid of the bores, Macro is not a bore.

This show will be dead if Marco goes tonight.”

Then it should be a vote to save! Personally I couldn't care less if he is evicted. And he probably will be on a VTE. No one man makes a show and the others will need to step it up!
george.millman
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by bluegroper:
“Then it should be a vote to save! Personally I couldn't care less if he is evicted. And he probably will be on a VTE. No one man makes a show and the others will need to step it up!”

I don't think it's about the others not stepping it up, I think it's about the edit. Remember that each person has been through an audition process (I know there's debate about whether they ended up there because they applied or whether they were approached, but the producers will have at least chatted to them in advance, see how they react in groups etc) so they should all have something to them that the producers want on the show. If someone was completely dull, they wouldn't have been put in the House in the first place. But if someone like Marco is being completely off the wall, that takes up a good deal of the episode no matter how interesting any of the others are being. If Marco wasn't there, maybe we'd start seeing some more dynamics.
danielleh
17-06-2016
If the people vote him out, there's nothing they can do. They've told us we're voting to evict, so whoever gets the most votes (please let it be Marco) has to be evicted. They may bring him back at a later date, if they're masochistic enough.

I'd love to see him go, not only is he irritating but he's a character suppressor. I think we'd see the better sides of more housemates if he were to go. It would also send a message to his fan club (Emma, Chelsea, some of the Others) that the public weren't fans.
Annsyre
17-06-2016
Originally Posted by Freddie4PM:
“I wouldn't be surprised if they reduced it to two on the public vote, then let 'The others' decide who gets evicted, relying on Chelsea to beat down anybody who suggests they go for Marco.”

People are paying to vote to evict a named housemate and the vote cannot be rigged. That's the law of the land.
<<
<
2 of 3
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map