DS Forums

 
 

Boring Tournament So Far?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 22-06-2016, 11:00
FusionFury
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 12,869

I find the whole tournament really boring thus far.. the "star players" are not shining like we demand of them.

A bit of an anti-climax to me.

What does everyone think of the tournament?
FusionFury is offline   Reply With Quote
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
Old 22-06-2016, 11:05
Thomas007
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,215
Its not bad, but I've heard some people calling the greatest euro's ever because of the high number of late goals, which is a load of crap.

We've had 58 goals in 32 games, which is an average 1.81 goals per game.

Italia 90 had the worst average ever for a World Cup at 2.21, so statistically speaking this tournament at the moment is making Italia 90 look like a goalfest.
Thomas007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 11:09
Xela M
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,578
I like it! The only thing I hate is how unfair the round of 16 is going to be. It's much better to come second in many groups and some group winners play runners up whereas others play 3rd placed teams. Some runners up play runners up. It makes no sense and is highly unfair. And I don't like the fact that all the strong teams are on one side of the draw and will eliminate each other before the final, whereas weaker teams have almost a free pass to the semis.
Xela M is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 11:10
misawa97
Inactive Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: London, UK
Posts: 11,516
I find the whole tournament really boring thus far.. the "star players" are not shining like we demand of them.

A bit of an anti-climax to me.

What does everyone think of the tournament?
Not great.

I think the amount of football and the intensity to which players are required to play at the top level now week in week out doesn't help summer tournaments.
misawa97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 11:10
Nova21
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,397
I've enjoyed it. Few goals yes, but not too many really dull games. Not much diving or feigning injury
Nova21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 11:11
celesti
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,842
It's been fine. The expected stars haven't shined, but other players have impressed in their place. Having 75% of some groups advance has ruined it a little, but the football itself I've enjoyed.
celesti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 11:12
Xela M
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,578
I've enjoyed it. Few goals yes, but not too many really dull games. Not much diving or feigning injury
Yes, and good refereeing!

I can't stand the usual flood of refereeing errors at each World Cup.
Xela M is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 11:24
FMKK
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 26,159
I think it's been mostly enjoyable but having 24 teams and putting through so many third place sides has encouraged negativity. Really though, there could be a lot more goals of the standard of finishing was better. There have been lots of squandered chances. I wonder if a lot of the top players are just exhausted from the season.
FMKK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 11:49
DUNDEEBOY
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,270
It's been a fairly negative tournament but there isn't much between teams there is a little between the top teams and there is litte between outside between what was the perceived top 6 seeds.

Defensive play is high quality but not even sure if the top scorer will get to six as normal.

Can see there being lots of defensive games and playing for pens in the last 16 as well, Switzerland v Poland would be as well doing the penalties now
DUNDEEBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 11:49
Sattrega
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kingdom of Arnor
Posts: 78,227
I've enjoyed it, too. I've liked the close games and not seeing the supposed minnows getting tonked. You don't always have to have goals in a game to enjoy it.

I've noticed a lot of negative comments about the 24-team system but genuinely cannot recall if the system got the same kind of criticism at the '86, '90, and '94 World Cups, two of which are remembered fondly as excellent tournaments. If they did I must have buried the memories.
Sattrega is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 11:51
DUNDEEBOY
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 56,270
I've enjoyed it, too. I've liked the close games and not seeing the supposed minnows getting tonked. You don't always have to have goals in a game to enjoy it.

I've noticed a lot of negative comments about the 24-team system but genuinely cannot recall if the system got the same kind of criticism at the '86, '90, and '94 World Cups, two of which are remembered fondly as excellent tournaments. If they did I must have buried the memories.
Fair point the standard is still probably higher than a world cup
DUNDEEBOY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 11:53
celesti
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 15,842
I've enjoyed it, too. I've liked the close games and not seeing the supposed minnows getting tonked. You don't always have to have goals in a game to enjoy it.

I've noticed a lot of negative comments about the 24-team system but genuinely cannot recall if the system got the same kind of criticism at the '86, '90, and '94 World Cups, two of which are remembered fondly as excellent tournaments. If they did I must have buried the memories.
I grew up with those so it was all I knew at the time but once the World Cup changed to 32 it seemed to add something extra to the group stage. Although they've expanded the scope of the Euros it feels almost a step back in time with the format.
celesti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 12:00
Dixon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,605
I haven't heard anyone say anything about this, looks to me like the players are having trouble with the ball that is being used. So many shots are ballooning yards over, and lots of poor corners as well.

As with much of football today, the quality of the smaller/weaker teams is higher but the quality at the top is not what it once was.
The defending is good. The effort from the players is tremendous. Tight matches and late goals. Probably the best atmosphere's ever at a tournament with huge away support.
It does need a few classic matches in the KO stage, and the talented players to start performing. If that happens it'll end up being a good tournament.
Dixon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 12:08
Nova21
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,397
Don't agree with the comments on the ball... In SA it was damn obvious, it was like an air flow ball. This ball is decent.

Agree re the atmospheres being as good as any tournament I remember and pretty much full stadia for every game
Nova21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 12:15
Dixon
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,605
Don't agree with the comments on the ball... In SA it was damn obvious, it was like an air flow ball. This ball is decent.

Agree re the atmospheres being as good as any tournament I remember and pretty much full stadia for every game
Not anywhere near as bad as in SA, but to me it does liook like it's flying a bit when they try to inject power into the ball.
Dixon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 12:17
soulboy77
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Herts
Posts: 17,002
The standard of football has been good across the board for the early rounds and the refereeing on the whole, has been excellent. Like most tournaments it will build and build after each knock out round, so it is a bit too early to compare with previous Euros and WCs. Looking forward to seeing some of the teams / top players really turning it on.
soulboy77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 12:19
ags_rule
Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,401
Some of the matches have been a bit dull but I don't necessarily think it has encouraged negative football. The weaker teams are obviously going to be dominated in terms of possession - this isn't setting up negatively, it's just a fact.

Another fact is that so many of them are still in with a chance of qualification come the last game, which has been brilliant in terms of reducing the number of dead rubber matches in the final round of group games.
ags_rule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 12:52
Draca_Noir
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 767
I like it! The only thing I hate is how unfair the round of 16 is going to be. It's much better to come second in many groups and some group winners play runners up whereas others play 3rd placed teams. Some runners up play runners up. It makes no sense and is highly unfair. And I don't like the fact that all the strong teams are on one side of the draw and will eliminate each other before the final, whereas weaker teams have almost a free pass to the semis.
Agree with you completely, Italy have won their group and to win the tournament, they will most likely have to beat Spain, France and Germany along the way. They were better off finishing second.

It's been a decent tournament, however as alluded to by some earlier posters, there have been games where its obvious teams have settled for a draw, meaning we've had some really boring games.
Draca_Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 13:06
Xela M
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,578
Agree with you completely, Italy have won their group and to win the tournament, they will most likely have to beat Spain, France and Germany along the way. They were better off finishing second.
Italy have the worst draw in the tournament! England were meant to have the best, but decided to complicate their lives (a million fold) for no reason.
Xela M is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 14:19
yakutz
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 10,224
The idea that it's somehow "unfair" that a group winner are going to have to play a runner-up & then two group winners to get to the final is daft. Both sides have three group winners, and the fact Spain & England failed to win theirs doesn't make it unfair.

It's also silly to say lesser teams are going to ease their way to the semis - assuming this refers to Wales and Croatia, they've done this because they won their respective groups ahead of England and Spain. Simply luck of the draw.
yakutz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 15:43
farmer bob
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: The United Kingdom
Posts: 14,997
Thoroughly enjoying it so far.
farmer bob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 15:57
dearmrman
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Utopia
Posts: 10,162
A bit lacklustre for me, though I wasn't excited for this tournament anyway, just seemed to lack something, maybe because these days, we get to see these exciting players week in week out and usually at a higher level of football then at International level.
dearmrman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 16:09
Mr_Bee
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 465
It's not been great IMO. I didn't even bother watching yesterday's games.
Mr_Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 16:13
Xela M
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,578
The idea that it's somehow "unfair" that a group winner are going to have to play a runner-up & then two group winners to get to the final is daft. Both sides have three group winners, and the fact Spain & England failed to win theirs doesn't make it unfair.

It's also silly to say lesser teams are going to ease their way to the semis - assuming this refers to Wales and Croatia, they've done this because they won their respective groups ahead of England and Spain. Simply luck of the draw.
Please explain to me the fairness in having SOME group winners play 3rd placed teams, SOME group winners play runner-up teams, SOME runner-up teams playing group winners and SOME runner-up teams playing other runner-up teams? How does that make sense?
Xela M is offline Follow this poster on Twitter   Reply With Quote
Old 22-06-2016, 16:52
alfamale
Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,853
Italy have the worst draw in the tournament! England were meant to have the best, but decided to complicate their lives (a million fold) for no reason.
I'm not saying Italy's path was that easy originally, but that in part was due to their results in last 2-3 years being pretty rubbish and their world ranking dropping. Then Italy's draw only got worse by both Spain (and England) finishing runners-up.

Only unfortunate thing for Italy is they cant get themselves in the easy half of the draw now, theyve won their group whatever.
alfamale is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply




 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:12.