You did a staggering amount of complaining about all things England on here for someone who wasn't bothered about them and wasn't supporting them!

So if Chelsea gave the managers job to someone you did not agree with you would stop following them?

One dinosaur manager replacing another.

Who in this time of little choice, would be your pick for the role?

So you supported the Home Nations, but not England? You're not an England supporter then are you? That makes you nothing more than the equivalent of an Arsenal supporter constantly moaning about Spurs in a Tottenham thread.

I think that England should consider either Harry Redknapp, Gus Hiddink, Patrick Vierra or David Moyes for the role.

Wow, shows how far we have slipped if those are some of the names people are putting forward for the role.

Well, we are minnow underdogs now.

You've put forward Laudrup and De Boer, who have less going for them than some of the candidates mentioned in the post you've quoted.

Vicente del Bosque González

Won everything there is to win in the game

why not give him a try?

This is the same Harry Redknapp who wondered why Leicesters Wes Morgan hadnt been called up to the England squad? even though he plays for Trinidad, lol.

Says the person who nominated Michael Laudrup for the job.

Well he has announced his retirement from football.

He did quite well with Swansea and win a league cup with them before falling out with the owners, and played some nice stuff whilst he was there, so I don't see why he is that bad a shout, not in this market where the options are threadbare to say the least.

He's not necessarily a bad shout.

Unless it's coming from the same person shooting down other people's suggestions and previously saying appointing Gus Hiddink would be "rewarding failure".

How's he any better than Hiddink? Or David Moyes, who also did a good job at Everton?

david moyes has been a terrible failure in his last two appointments, and has won nothing. zero, zilch.

He is out of work, and cannot get a gig in 92 clubs so far. Why on earth should he waltz into the top job?

I'm not saying he should, but that's not the point I'm making...

Yeah, Moyes is clearly a ludicrous suggestion. I mean, none of the 92 league clubs would touch him with a barge pole.

He was laughed out of the car park, at Chesterfield.

We just have a very small pool of people to select from, so no matter who is appointed, it will most likely be a disappointment.

That's the spirit!

Has Laurent Blanc got a new gig, yet? I'd have given him a tap.

Doubt it, he hates the press apparently...gets an easy time of it in France, and still doesn't want to speak to them.

I'd throw in the whole kitchen sink.

That's a nice way of getting out of justifying your position, I suppose.

No need to say why Michael Laudrup would be a better choice than the failure Gus Hiddink when we're going to be disappointed anyway.

Huh?

I did justify my option, by saying that the pool of available people that could reasonably assumed to be in line with a chance of getting the job, is not that wide, or deep, so whomever The FA decide will be a disappointment to a large sway of the public.

As for the Laudrup v Hiddink bit you are referring to, well both would yes be coming off of not too successful a time, however on a purely personal level, Laudrup I believe has more going for him then Hiddink, who is getting on in years.

But this is purely my opinion, you or others may disagree and think Hiddink is a better option, and fair enough then, I have no quibbles about that being the case.