Originally Posted by Stilton Cheesew:
“It really didn't, please don't make out you are some kind of visionary. If you complain about everything and change your mind a lot its easy to reference things you can claim to be right about.”
That's one of the many unfortunate consequences of and England debacle is that you get hundreds of thousands of idiots with public platforms claiming they foresaw everything and are seemingly either too thick or too embarrassed to acknowledge that other than saying England wouldn't win they actually got little else right.
We now have all these apparent experts who were complaining of the same old usual players being picked, despite the England squad being the youngest in history and in the tournament and it being won by the oldest squad.
But then you had others complaining Defoe wasn't picked and Rashford was, then complaining when Rooney was picked, then complaining when he was subbed, then when he was dropped and now its back to him being picked again.
Sure, some of them may be right, but its obvious they cannot all be and that half of those have been proven to be completely wrong but England were dreadful, humiliated by Iceland so who's going to successfully argue against them, as they won't argue with each other.
Everybody moaned at six changes and referenced Del Bosque not making any despite being through, but then ignored that that decision may have cost Span the match and then the tournament. Did that prove everybody right? Maybe, maybe not but its much easier to pretend that you're some sort of visionary.
Even now, you take 10 of these critics and they will have 10 completely different suggestions on should Vardy play, or Kane or both, or neither, in a 4-3-3 in a 4-4-2, one behind the other, one on the left or right.
Its the easiest thing in the world to be some knob on Twitter who just moans about absolutely everything, sometimes the very opposite of what you were complaining about the week before and then when it all goes wrong, just remember the criticisms where you were half right and brush aside the others.
They said that England games would be dull and turgid. About 44 of the 48 games were that, including all but 30 minutes of the winners matches. I only enjoyed 3 or 4 games and two were England's.
There were plenty of Hodgson critics who were proved more wrong than right in that tournament.