I wasn't going to reply to this (that sounds rude! I mean because I think it takes my post way too seriously, not because it's not worth responding to!) but I'll give it a shot
Originally Posted by Veri:
“How do you know it's far from the truth?”
I don't, it's my opinion - I didn't think that needed to be pointed out as everything that I (and most of us) type here is opinion. I apologise if I gave the impression that I was posting my opinion as fact. The clue should have been in "the way I see it"
Quote:
“And what about it is an insult to the younger FMs? (The OP looked like it was criticising older FMs, rather than younger ones.)”
Again, just my opinion - but it seemed to imply that younger people only go for younger housemates as older people only (according to the OP) go for older ones. Somebody has to be supporting the younger ones - if it's not the older FMs it must be the younger ones!
Quote:
“Do you think it isn't even possible that older FMs tend to like older HMs, and younger FMs tend to like younger HMs? (If someone had said that, I don't think there'd be many people questioning it.)”
It's possible - anything is possible. It's even probable, perhaps it's absolute. My post wasn't a statistical analysis it was an opinion, a comment even, or a rebuttal of the OP's post; an alternative view-point, a 'perhaps' - as, of course, is yours
I think fewer would have questioned it too if the OP hadn't suggested that the older FMs (or SOME of the older FMs) were 'nasty'.
Quote:
“I notice that in most cases, you say "some" FMs and "others", but when it's "want to get rid of the quieter housemates", you say "a few". I think it's pretty clearly more than a few.”
I used different words because I realised I was using the word "some" a lot and it was getting repetitive. I didn't think too much about which alternative I would use, it could have been another word, but I chose "few".

I did have a bit of fun Googling synonyms for 'plethora' though
Quote:
“But the general point is that numbers in the various categories don't have to be anywhere near equal. You describe the FMs as if everything was spread around and equally mixed, but it's not clear that's so. That "there are people of varying ages in each and every group" doesn't mean there's an even spread of ages in every group. There can be statistical patterns, correlations. And one of them might be that older FMs tend to like older HMs, and younger FMs tend to like younger HMs”
bib - no, you read it that way. I never said the groups were equally or evenly spread. It may well be that older FMs
tend to like older HMs and younger FMs
tend to like younger HMs, I just don't think it's that simple.
The OP's implication (to be kind to the OP) that the 'nasty folk' posting here are older FMs is simplistic at best and unnecessarily rude (in my opinion). "I
think it shows what the average age is of many of the nasty folk posting on here with not a nice word to say about anything because all the negativity is aimed at the younger housemates who have done little to deserve it and the older housemates who have been demonic are defended to the bitter end"
I look forward, with great interest, to your equally challenging, analytical opinion and comments regarding the Original Post and it's content.
I hope that clarifies my position and mind-set at the time I made the post.
Last edited by muggins14 : 30-06-2016 at 10:14