Originally Posted by KT_Dog:
“I briefly fell into the 'sly' camp the other day, following "whisper-gate", because when I watched it play out on the episode itself it did come heavily across that way - as things sometimes do when they rapidly pass before your eyes without pause.
I saw him sitting in the smoking area discussing with Lateysha the fact she DID think Jason was a game player because Charlie told her, but she couldn't say that during the task because of the fall out that would come from it... Andy himself then replied, "Yes that would be like throwing a hand grenade in the house"...
...he then went off to tell various other people what she'd really said, under the guise of asking their opinion on the matter, before confronting her again - orchestrating a row with her and the fellow whisperers - then heading off to Jason and declaring he now feels he should just tell him everything because 'the way they just spoke to me I owe them no loyalty' - so he told him that Lateysha had already said earlier he was a game player and that when she said it in the task she obviously meant it. He then stopped just short of confirming Charlie had been the one who put the idea in her head, despite Jason angling for the information and instead informed him he should go and talk to Lateysha.... And thus the handgrenade he himself had predicted had its pin pulled and Lateysha was left holding it. BOOM!!!!!
...see, even typing all that it now it seems incredibly machievellian. It was only because I went back and watched it in segments in order to do a transcript (it's knocking about somewhere on this board) that I came to the conclusion it was nothing of the sort. He had a slightly broader concern that was troubling him, based on the fact he himself had been misinterpreted due to Chinese whispers, that he was trying to bring to ahead. But when it all zips by on the screen and everyone shouting over the top of each other it kind of becomes lost and you just end up with the surface level interpretation, which is the one I've highlighted above.
I'm not quite sure what I'm saying here... I guess it's that I'm not surprised at all people think he's sly. I don't think he is, but I think he's spectacularly bad at getting his point across.”
Good stuff, KT. I'm of much the same mind.
I definitely got the feeling watching the edit (and I haven't rewatched it) that his goal in the whole affair was to rat out Lateysha to Jason and he just took a ponderous and inept route to justify doing so. I'm still of half a mind that that was at least
part of it, revenge for the grief she'd given him in the first week, but that may just reflect the cynic in me.
However there was a clip (I don''t think it made the main show) where he was taking counsel (shoutout to Eubank) from Chelsea and made the distinction that he was angry about whispering campaigns done to deliberately undermine a HM's position. Leaving aside the irony of that, considering what Chelsea's done to Jayne, I thought that was an important distinction.
I'm cutting him some slack over Jason on reflection, as Andy has talked a lot about loyalty and was very grateful last night when he discovered that Jason hadn't nommed him. So I think he was genuinely concerned and upset that his friend might be getting the undermining treatment when the whole gameplayer thing came up and he wanted to stick up for him out of mutual loyalty, and was relieved last night when he felt that had been vindicated.
As for the whole sly and manipulative business, it seems self evident to me in both ways. I understand why Andy thinks they're backbiting bitches out to undermine particular HMs and I understand why the gang think he's a sly, manipulative stirrer. I also understand why some posters think he's sly and some don't. There's no mystery in any of that to me.
And yes, his way of getting his point across is counter productive, at least with the people he's dealing with in the house.