She reminds me of Glen Close'scharacter in Fatal Attraction. A complete fruit loop, I'm surprised Jason hasn't found his dog cooking in a pan on the stove yet.
Charlie is in need of help,
2 of 2
Yeah,a nasty woman.I wouldn't be surprised if she knows something Jason doesnt want anyone to know and he's sh#it scared she's gonna let it out.
She is a complete fruit and nut case, and it is in no way entertaining watching a grown woman making a fool of herself....
Arghh the woman is clearly unhinged as evidenced by:
the perpetual getting up in Jason's face about anything and everything he ever did/said/thought wrong and then as soon as he starts trying to explain himself he gets hit with a barrage of "It's fine, it's fine, we weren't together anyway, it's fine, it doesn't matter anyway cos we're not together!" Oh yes and "IT'S FINE!"
Well quite clearly it feckin' isn't or she wouldn't be going on about it to his face, bitching about it all behind his back only to be followed by DR chats about wanting to marry him!
He seriously needs to get shot of her, pronto!
the perpetual getting up in Jason's face about anything and everything he ever did/said/thought wrong and then as soon as he starts trying to explain himself he gets hit with a barrage of "It's fine, it's fine, we weren't together anyway, it's fine, it doesn't matter anyway cos we're not together!" Oh yes and "IT'S FINE!"
Well quite clearly it feckin' isn't or she wouldn't be going on about it to his face, bitching about it all behind his back only to be followed by DR chats about wanting to marry him!
He seriously needs to get shot of her, pronto!
Originally Posted by Wainy84:
“A decent partner would of told her where he was going, and also tell her he won't be home for the night as I'm staying at a hotel.”
“A decent partner would of told her where he was going, and also tell her he won't be home for the night as I'm staying at a hotel.”
Didn't he say, they weren't together then
Originally Posted by Kopite1763:
“Didn't he say, they weren't together then”
“Didn't he say, they weren't together then
”
Not sure. As everything is confusing between them two.
If the roles were reversed and it was Jason that was emotionally haranguing Charlie, the public reaction would be very different. There wouldn't be talk of "mixed signals", he would be accused of bullying and abuse. I have no idea how he treated her outside the House but the way she's treating him in there is wrong and uncomfortable to watch.
Originally Posted by SULLA:
“Jason will not do that. He wants to win BB”
“Jason will not do that. He wants to win BB”
And what is wrong with that?
Originally Posted by scout2006:
“If the roles were reversed and it was Jason that was emotionally haranguing Charlie, the public reaction would be very different. There wouldn't be talk of "mixed signals", he would be accused of bullying and abuse. I have no idea how he treated her outside the House but the way she's treating him in there is wrong and uncomfortable to watch.”
“If the roles were reversed and it was Jason that was emotionally haranguing Charlie, the public reaction would be very different. There wouldn't be talk of "mixed signals", he would be accused of bullying and abuse. I have no idea how he treated her outside the House but the way she's treating him in there is wrong and uncomfortable to watch.”
Maybe if he had some guts and told her where to go. He fetches it all on himself seen as he wants to be seen as the knight in shinning armour.
He's a grown man of 50 years old so I think he quite capable of looking after himself.
He's not a child who needs people looking out for him.
Originally Posted by scout2006:
“If the roles were reversed and it was Jason that was emotionally haranguing Charlie, the public reaction would be very different. There wouldn't be talk of "mixed signals", he would be accused of bullying and abuse. I have no idea how he treated her outside the House but the way she's treating him in there is wrong and uncomfortable to watch.”
“If the roles were reversed and it was Jason that was emotionally haranguing Charlie, the public reaction would be very different. There wouldn't be talk of "mixed signals", he would be accused of bullying and abuse. I have no idea how he treated her outside the House but the way she's treating him in there is wrong and uncomfortable to watch.”
I was just about to post the same comment.
If the roles were reversed, I'm sure there would be complaints aplenty.
Also, you have to remember that men can be the victims of domestic abuse, whether it be physical or mental.
I'm not saying that is the case here, but it would perhaps explain a few things, like why Jason just doesn't tell her to do one. He has already said she has an explosive temper, and flies off the handle at the slightest thing, and we have seen that with her.
Even big burly men can be victims.........just a thought
Originally Posted by Kopite1763:
“I was just about to post the same comment.
If the roles were reversed, I'm sure there would be complaints aplenty.
Also, you have to remember that men can be the victims of domestic abuse, whether it be physical or mental.
I'm not saying that is the case here, but it would perhaps explain a few things, like why Jason just doesn't tell her to do one. He has already said she has an explosive temper, and flies off the handle at the slightest thing, and we have seen that with her.
Even big burly men can be victims.........just a thought”
“I was just about to post the same comment.
If the roles were reversed, I'm sure there would be complaints aplenty.
Also, you have to remember that men can be the victims of domestic abuse, whether it be physical or mental.
I'm not saying that is the case here, but it would perhaps explain a few things, like why Jason just doesn't tell her to do one. He has already said she has an explosive temper, and flies off the handle at the slightest thing, and we have seen that with her.
Even big burly men can be victims.........just a thought
”
More like she got something on him that he does not want coming out.
He's no shrinking voilet. He soon led Hughie out to the diary room.
Also didn't mind causing her to flip with the Dog-gate.
As he could go to his housemates and get sympathy.
Originally Posted by Wainy84:
“More like she got something on him that he does not want coming out.
He's no shrinking voilet. He soon led Hughie out to the diary room.
Also didn't mind causing her to flip with the Dog-gate.”
“More like she got something on him that he does not want coming out.
He's no shrinking voilet. He soon led Hughie out to the diary room.
Also didn't mind causing her to flip with the Dog-gate.”
Either senario is possible though.
Leading Hughie to the DR is irrelevant, as it has nothing to do with his relationship with Charlie.
Even victims can snap when pushed, and boy has he been pushed.
I'm not saying my thoughts are right and yours are wrong, just think there are other explanations to their complex relationship
Originally Posted by Kopite1763:
“Either senario is possible though.
Leading Hughie to the DR is irrelevant, as it has nothing to do with his relationship with Charlie.
Even victims can snap when pushed, and boy has he been pushed.
I'm not saying my thoughts are right and yours are wrong, just think there are other explanations to their complex relationship”
“Either senario is possible though.
Leading Hughie to the DR is irrelevant, as it has nothing to do with his relationship with Charlie.
Even victims can snap when pushed, and boy has he been pushed.
I'm not saying my thoughts are right and yours are wrong, just think there are other explanations to their complex relationship
”
I agree.
Originally Posted by funky_nomad:
“Arghh the woman is clearly unhinged as evidenced by:
the perpetual getting up in Jason's face about anything and everything he ever did/said/thought wrong and then as soon as he starts trying to explain himself he gets hit with a barrage of "It's fine, it's fine, we weren't together anyway, it's fine, it doesn't matter anyway cos we're not together!" Oh yes and "IT'S FINE!"
Well quite clearly it feckin' isn't or she wouldn't be going on about it to his face, bitching about it all behind his back only to be followed by DR chats about wanting to marry him!
He seriously needs to get shot of her, pronto!”
“Arghh the woman is clearly unhinged as evidenced by:
the perpetual getting up in Jason's face about anything and everything he ever did/said/thought wrong and then as soon as he starts trying to explain himself he gets hit with a barrage of "It's fine, it's fine, we weren't together anyway, it's fine, it doesn't matter anyway cos we're not together!" Oh yes and "IT'S FINE!"
Well quite clearly it feckin' isn't or she wouldn't be going on about it to his face, bitching about it all behind his back only to be followed by DR chats about wanting to marry him!
He seriously needs to get shot of her, pronto!”
Exactly! And I was thinking, if she's like this on camera what on earth was she not like behind closed doors in a relationship.
I HATE terms like this bandied about on forums but - and I'm sorry if I'm wrong, it's just a feeling - I can't help thinking it's fairly close to emotional abuse. I may be going too far, I don't know, but she IS a nightmare.
Even if they were together and he lied about going to a hotel then I am not surprised. She does not handle things well. She wants to control Jason and gets very angry at him (and possibly his dog
) when she can't. That's what I think this pussy footing is about. Not that he wants to be the knight in shining armour or she has something on him - he knows what she's like and he's doing everything he can to pacify her. Self preservation.
It's a clusterf*ck. Be glad when one or both are gone tbh. Preferably her.
2 of 2
