|
||||||||
Why do DVD's look terrible on HDTV ... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 330
|
Why do DVD's look terrible on HDTV ...
I recently decided to watch Lord of the Rings via my DVD player and HDTV. The picture quality is awful. Especially the faces. Very grainy and some ghosting. I've played about with the settings on the TV with no effect.
On my old analogue TV using S-Video connection and Sony DVD player, the movies looked fantastic. The DVD's are not Blu Ray. I'm not sure this would make much difference from what I've read elsewhere. Samsung UE19H4000 19-Inch Widescreen HD Ready LED TV LG DP432 DVD Player With HDMI Upscaling Is there anything I can do to improve the quality? |
|
|
|
|
Please sign in or register to remove this advertisement.
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NE Hants
Posts: 455
|
Have you tried setting the TV's picture mode to "Cinema"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hertfordshire
Posts: 2,935
|
Turn off the HD upscaling on the DVD player and let the TV do it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Liverpool, UK
Posts: 2,194
|
DVDs obviously won't look as good as anything that is HD on a HD TV, but should still be watchable.
On your TV's picture settings, ensure that all the so-called "enhanced" picture processing features are turned off (ie. Noise Reduction etc) and dial down the sharpness levels - you ideally want as little sharpness as possible without making things too blurry. Also play around with Brightness & Contrast settings and you should end up with an acceptable image. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Reading
Posts: 27,894
|
According to the Smsung website the TV's panel has resolution of 1366x786 pixels. If you have the DVD player set to upscale to 1080 resolution the TV is then downscaling it to 768. That double scaling might have some effect on image quality.
So either turn off upscaling on the DVD or set it to scale to 720 resolution if it has that option. See if either of those make a difference. I would also echo the advice to turn off all the so called picture enhancement features. In my experience all they do is degrade the picture to varying degrees. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
|
Quote:
So either turn off upscaling on the DVD or set it to scale to 720 resolution if it has that option. See if either of those make a difference.
The best option, as you also suggested, is likely to be setting the DVD not to scale at all, and let the TV do it instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,455
|
If you are using Dynamic mode try Standard.
User guide courtesy of Argos. http://www.argos-support.co.uk/impor...ls/2788117.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,881
|
Typically DVDs look pretty good on an HD TV. DVDs usually have the best standard definition PQ available in domestic settings.
The picture faults you describe sound like the type of defects you can get with "analogue" video. How is your DVD player connected to your TV? For best results you need your DVD player to be connected to the TV via an HDMI cable to get digital video from the DVD player to your TV. If the connection is SCART or S-video that's old analogue technology that will give markedly inferior results. If you're not currently using HDMI it's well worth spending £5-£15 on a cable (Don't be fooled into paying any more than that. Some scurrilous sales people may try to sell you cables costing tens of pounds or more. It's basically a con.) I also agree with all the others and recommend you turn off as much picture processing as possible and let the TV do the upscaling. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,881
|
I just checked the user manual for your LG DVD player. Your DVD player doesn't seem to have even S-video out, so if you're not using HDMI what you'll be watching is plain old analogue composite video, a step down from S-video in terms PQ.
Another thing to check is that the DVD is set to output to a 16:9 TV and that the TV is set to 16:9 mode. If not, your TV may be zoomed into a letterboxed image scaled down for old style 4:3 TVs. That would give seriously bad PQ due to all the scaling down and up as well as using analogue video. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: S.West England.
Posts: 18,032
|
My first instinct would be the connecting cable. Op mentions ghosting, that can happen when a scart cable is used and the scart is faulty. So if your using a scart cable, replace it, ideally with an HDMI cable if your tv and DVD player have those sockets.
From my experience, DVD while is SD quality usually represents the best of what SD can offer and works quite well on HD screens. Obviously old content from decades ago, which is now sold on DVD will look like it always has. If the original content was poor, it still will be on DVD, but I don't think that's the case here. With modern content, DVD should look better than SD tv channels on modern HD screens. |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,881
|
Quote:
Typically DVDs look pretty good on an HD TV. DVDs usually have the best standard definition PQ available in domestic settings.
The picture faults you describe sound like the type of defects you can get with "analogue" video. How is your DVD player connected to your TV? For best results you need your DVD player to be connected to the TV via an HDMI cable to get digital video from the DVD player to your TV. If the connection is SCART or S-video that's old analogue technology that will give markedly inferior results. If you're not currently using HDMI it's well worth spending £5-£15 on a HDMI cable (Don't be fooled into paying any more than that. Some scurrilous sales people may try to sell you cables costing tens of pounds or more. It's basically a con.) I also agree with all the others and recommend you turn off as much picture processing as possible and let the TV do the upscaling. I believe David (2) is also correct in everything in his post. You're right, BTW, about Blu Ray. On a 19" HD Ready TV (probably 720 or 768 panel) you'd struggle to see much difference, if at all, between Blu Ray and DVD. You have to go to a screen size bigger than about 30" to start to see the benefits of the higher 1080 resolution Blu Rays offer. That said, if you're ever going to get a TV with a much larger screen, it's worth getting a cheap blu ray player now to start building your collection on Blu Ray as opposed to DVD. Blu Ray players are incredibly cheap nowadays and discs themselves are not much more expensive than DVDs. And you can still watch your DVDs using a blu ray player. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,049
|
Time to start buying Blu-ray.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,693
|
Quote:
You're right, BTW, about Blu Ray. On a 19" HD Ready TV (probably 720 or 768 panel) you'd struggle to see much difference, if at all, between Blu Ray and DVD. You have to go to a screen size bigger than about 30" to start to see the benefits of the higher 1080 resolution Blu Rays offer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,881
|
Quote:
No you won't if sat at the correct distance and no you don't have to go bigger than 30" to get the benefits of 1080.
The OP's TV is 19" HD Ready (meaning 720 (or 768) not 1080). As for screen size, I was estimating based on my own experiences and TV and again assuming a typical lounge-type viewing distance and 720 vs 1080. At what screen size would you estimate do you begin to see the difference? (And, by the way, it's possible to correct someone when you think they're wrong without seeming to be quite so hostile and abrupt). |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,693
|
Quote:
How far you sit away from the screen does have an impact. True. I was assuming typical viewing distances. For a 19" set you'd have be sitting very close to spot the difference.
The OP's TV is 19" HD Ready (meaning 720 (or 768) not 1080). As for screen size, I was estimating based on my own experiences and TV and again assuming a typical lounge-type viewing distance and 720 vs 1080. At what screen size would you estimate do you begin to see the difference? (And, by the way, it's possible to correct someone when you think they're wrong without seeming to be quite so hostile and abrupt). |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,881
|
Quote:
1080 is apparent on very small screens if viewed from the correct distance. Gaming monitors tablets and even phones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,693
|
Quote:
No. For very small screen sizes particularly it's just a sales gimmick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Wigan
Posts: 4,881
|
Quote:
But it isn't though. You clearly don't know about resolution and viewing distances.
I grant that you may be able to see some difference on tiny phone screens at very short (i.e. handheld distances). The distance most people actually sit away from their screens is determined by the size of the room, not from an examination of the ideal distance for a given size of screen at a given resolution. The ideal viewing distance range for a given screen size in SD would be much farther away than for the same size screen in HD. People don't tend to move their couch closer to the screen when they upgrade to HD. My original comment was a rough approximation only, based on personal experience. I still stand by it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 17,848
|
time to buy a blu ray player, I think.
dvd's played by blu-rays are perfectly acceptable. not quite as crisp as blu rays, but eminently watchable |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Derbyshire
Posts: 41,782
|
Quote:
time to buy a blu ray player, I think.
dvd's played by blu-rays are perfectly acceptable. not quite as crisp as blu rays, but eminently watchable |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 3,455
|
As the o/p has not bothered to reply to any posts I suggest we all give up on this one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 17,848
|
Quote:
Just as DVD's played in a DVD player are perfectly acceptable, the 'problem' is either in the OP's equipment, or his settings.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:07.


