Originally Posted by anne16:
“Oh dear,not good,was it that bad or just another tale!!”
From what I've heard, it's all pretty much true, Anne.
Originally Posted by issfan:
“Tabloid journalists create stories by reading tweets or by reading forums like this. That is why Laura and Giovanni did not use twitter to communicate. I wonder where they got the information for their story. Any ideas anyone?”
Originally Posted by issfan:
“interesting that the people on here had a discussion recently about Laura and Giovanni not getting on. Was it yesterday or the day before? Work it out.”
You really haven't a clue about journalism do you? I can assure you that the gutter press do not get their stories from our thread - for starters we've always found things out way before them and have a giggle about their shit journalism as they print stories about things we knew weeks ago - it's not a credible source.
The sources in these papers - whether people wish to believe it or not - are credible sources. And people always say you can't believe everything you read (which is true, in some cases) but more often than not, what has been said, by sources, is true.
Papers don't read a few people's gossiping posts on a forum and print it as news! Let alone credit us as 'a source.' Their sources are credible people, with proven insight knowledge to thing they are divulging information on, to the press.
Which one of us knew what went on in the training room? So how they got that information from us is beyond me??
I, for one, have heard from, more than one, credible source that Laura and Gio did not/do not get on. I thought it obvious from watching them but I can understand how others didn't.
People can hold whatever they opinion they like (over Gio/Laura), it matters little to me but to be so daft as to suggest the papers got this 'story' from this thread is ludicrous!