That's why she hurt her back!? Lol
CS: Is Leanne Back On The Game??
1 of 2
Leanne had a smile on her face after nick's massage, and simon heard her moaning .... are we heading for another
plot?
Spoiler
Originally Posted by jsmith99:
“Leanne had a smile on her face after nick's massage, and simon heard her moaning .... are we heading for another
plot?”
“Leanne had a smile on her face after nick's massage, and simon heard her moaning .... are we heading for another
Spoiler
I'd put money on something like that. It's about Corrie's level at the moment.
Originally Posted by babelogue:
“I'd put money on something like that. It's about Corrie's level at the moment.”
“I'd put money on something like that. It's about Corrie's level at the moment.”
Who's the daddy!?
I love how they had Leanne and Robert stare at each other in the street, to try and mislead us into thinking they slept with each other.
Only in soaps do women get pregnant in one night stands and realize they're pregnant two weeks later. 
Originally Posted by callumfreeman:
“I love how they had Leanne and Robert stare at each other in the street, to try and mislead us into thinking they slept with each other.”
“I love how they had Leanne and Robert stare at each other in the street, to try and mislead us into thinking they slept with each other.”
I don't understand why they bother with the who's the daddy storyline when they revealed the spoiler about _____.
It makes watching the show very anti-climactic.
Originally Posted by davejc64:
“Isn't the father of the baby supposed to be name removed for spoiler reasons”
“Isn't the father of the baby supposed to be name removed for spoiler reasons”
Ahem - see the spoilers in the posts above!
Yes, it's a shame they had to blow this "who's the daddy" plot by giving it away in advance - as they do with practically every plot detail these days *sighs*
Originally Posted by davads:
“Ahem - see the spoilers in the posts above!
Yes, it's a shame they had to blow this "who's the daddy" plot by giving it away in advance - as they do with practically every plot detail these days *sighs*”
“Ahem - see the spoilers in the posts above!
Yes, it's a shame they had to blow this "who's the daddy" plot by giving it away in advance - as they do with practically every plot detail these days *sighs*
”
Oh well.
Originally Posted by FusionFury:
“That's why she hurt her back!? Lol”
“That's why she hurt her back!? Lol”
This is work related. She should go immediately to that underused clinic for therapy. They'll have her back on her back in no time.
So were we ever privy to or even slightly suggested that the 2 of them even had a drink together, let alone a one-night-stand? The story line is unbelievable to say the least..
Originally Posted by 40-40J's:
“So were we ever privy to or even slightly suggested that the 2 of them even had a drink together, let alone a one-night-stand? The story line is unbelievable to say the least..”
“So were we ever privy to or even slightly suggested that the 2 of them even had a drink together, let alone a one-night-stand? The story line is unbelievable to say the least..”
Yes. It was a scene the other week where a mystery person came round to her flat, but we only saw Leanne from their point of view, not who they actually were... Later on we saw a shadowy blur as they'd just left.
Originally Posted by davads:
“Yes. It was a scene the other week where a mystery person came round to her flat, but we only saw Leanne from their point of view, not who they actually were... Later on we saw a shadowy blur as they'd just left.”
“Yes. It was a scene the other week where a mystery person came round to her flat, but we only saw Leanne from their point of view, not who they actually were... Later on we saw a shadowy blur as they'd just left.”
So the answer is 'no' then
I remember that scene but that does say him - we were supposed to believe it was one of the 3 that left a message on her mobile phone and he wasn't even one of those!
Originally Posted by 40-40J's:
“So the answer is 'no' then”
“So the answer is 'no' then
”
Well, no, the answer is "yes" - clearly that's the scene where we are to assume the "deed" happened. Although it would have been a far better twist if it had all happened off-screen, with no prior knowledge of it on our part...
Originally Posted by davads:
“Well, no, the answer is "yes" - clearly that's the scene where we are to assume the "deed" happened. Although it would have been a far better twist if it had all happened off-screen, with no prior knowledge of it on our part...”
“Well, no, the answer is "yes" - clearly that's the scene where we are to assume the "deed" happened. Although it would have been a far better twist if it had all happened off-screen, with no prior knowledge of it on our part...”
So from that scene, you assume him
Why not Ken, Kirk, Norris or even Billy (thought he'd try a bit of the other ).
Originally Posted by 40-40J's:
“So from that scene, you assume him”
“So from that scene, you assume him
”
Well, because I've read the spoiler, yes.
Originally Posted by davejc64:
“Isn't the father of the baby supposed to be Steve?”
“Isn't the father of the baby supposed to be Steve?”
I don't understand why they released this as a spoiler, as there have been no actual clues in the show, why not just keep it a secret?
Originally Posted by MR_Pitkin:
“I don't understand why they released this as a spoiler, as there have been no actual clues in the show, why not just keep it a secret?”
“I don't understand why they released this as a spoiler, as there have been no actual clues in the show, why not just keep it a secret?”
Well, quite; I'd say the same about Friday's big event - imagine how amazing that would have been if it had been kept under wraps - but that's a whole 'nother issue
1 of 2
