• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Why are they now FINALLY making it a Vote to SAVE !!
4troy7
13-07-2016
Definetly to save Jason he would out of there if it was Vote To Evict !
nojunkmail
13-07-2016
Evelyn / Laura / Sam will be bottom 3
Aura101
13-07-2016
No its sensible when doing a multiple eviction with all the housemates. Glad they have FINALLY learnt from past mistakes.
Can't imagine they care about saving Jason at all. And I very much doubt he would be evicted either way TBH
detroit city
13-07-2016
Originally Posted by 4troy7:
“Definetly to save Jason he would out of there if it was Vote To Evict !”

Take the show for what it is, a joke.
sorcha_healy27
13-07-2016
Originally Posted by 4troy7:
“Definetly to save Jason he would out of there if it was Vote To Evict !”

Mystic meg has joined Ds I see.
Drew_Hatch
13-07-2016
It's like a mini-final. They've done it before when the whole house is up for eviction, I remember back during BB10 (the C4 era even) they did it when the whole house went up for noms talk rule breaking.

Plus if people don't pay to evict they can bring one of them back.
Salv*
13-07-2016
They are doing something incredible!

Sam surely will be bottom 3. Along with Laura and ??
Skyrah
13-07-2016
IMO only 4 is worth saving

Jason
Andy
Laura
Evelyn

Oooooop's Andy isn't up for eviction

Make that 3 worth saving
Helen90
13-07-2016
Are the bottom three evicted? Or just one of them?
James Frederick
13-07-2016
Originally Posted by Helen90:
“Are the bottom three evicted? Or just one of them?”

I think the HM's will pick one of them.

But this will give them a idea of who is liked.
Jimmy Connors
13-07-2016
Originally Posted by detroit city:
“Take the show for what it is, a joke.”

Spot on.
4troy7
13-07-2016
Originally Posted by Aura101:
“No its sensible when doing a multiple eviction with all the housemates. Glad they have FINALLY learnt from past mistakes.
Can't imagine they care about saving Jason at all. And I very much doubt he would be evicted either way TBH”

Well they didn't do it last year when they chucked 4 people out ! I know it's sensible but just weird how they suddenly NOW decided to have a Vote to Save !
rhizo_mania
13-07-2016
Originally Posted by Skyrah:
“IMO only 4 is worth saving

Jason
Andy
Laura
Evelyn”


I'm with you on that, but I don't vote
Aura101
13-07-2016
Originally Posted by 4troy7:
“Well they didn't do it last year when they chucked 4 people out ! I know it's sensible but just weird how they suddenly NOW decided to have a Vote to Save !”

I know thats why I said learnt from past mistakes. There was a hoo harr last year when they evicted the 4 on VTE.
Thought of course nothing will be as bad as the quadruple eviction on channel 4 wiping out all Josie's competition
*~TeePee~*
13-07-2016
To ensure Golden Boy Jason doesn't budge.
benbeez1
13-07-2016
about time they did this, get the dead wood out AKA Alex,Jackson,Ryan,Sam
J Swift
13-07-2016
Vote to save always makes more sense
satellite
13-07-2016
No one will save Sam, he's tedious in the extreme.
atko
13-07-2016
Originally Posted by 4troy7:
“Definetly to save Jason he would out of there if it was Vote To Evict !”

Exactly! They want him saved.....he would definitely go on a vote to evict because the votes would be on him but vote to save brings him more in to the game because votes will be more evenly spread across the board. Typical BB just like saving his mate Andy they are both guaranteed to stay!
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map