• TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
  • Follow
    • Follow
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • google+
    • instagram
    • youtube
Hearst Corporation
  • TV
  • MOVIES
  • MUSIC
  • SHOWBIZ
  • SOAPS
  • GAMING
  • TECH
  • FORUMS
Forums
  • Register
  • Login
  • Forums
  • TV
  • Big Brother
Jason's hypocritical reasons for choosing Lateysha
<<
<
5 of 5
>>
>
Bench
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by Scarlett Berry:
“AH wow Bench, that's so cool”

Aw shucks
Vesna
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by zx50:
“You think so? The fact that she criticised Jason's decision (in front of housemates) of having Lateysha evicted shows that she's desperate to stay in the house. She was trying to keep in well with the others by showing others that she was criticising Jason for his decision when they were in the garden area.”

I think Jason hitting the button and then LYING that it wasn't about the money shows he's the most desperate to win. Jason has made an issue of others doing what he does, he's a massive hypocrite. You are welcome to think the sun shines out his bottom. I can see him for the turdblossom he is.

Originally Posted by trevor tiger:
“Exactly. Though to be fair to her they were all acting their little hearts out trying to please each other and the voting public. Like Evelyn said they were all over it a nano second later ”

Nothing fair about pretending something would happen. 4 people went for the button. Jason was ALWAYS going to go for it. He saw the money and thought right I'll have that, it was written all over his face. NO ONE in the bedroom crew hit the button. 2 of Jason's bitch crew did (him and Jackson another weasel like male and 2 floaters)

Originally Posted by jeanoj:
“Do you want a prize? ”

If you think that's appropriate. Just pointing out that I can see Jason for who he is. Shame is so many can't but it's no worries for me.
Derek_Hale
14-07-2016
I think there's a fundamental difference between a 20 year old and a 9 month year old. But regardless, he should never have brought that up, since he went in hard on Charlie for mentioning his kid.
Wainy84
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by Derek_Hale:
“I think there's a fundamental difference between a 20 year old and a 9 month year old. But regardless, he should never have brought that up, since he went in hard on Charlie for mentioning his kid.”

Good point.
karl_kennedy
14-07-2016
Originally Posted by ahoyy:
“She is far from gone.”

She's gone...accept it and move on with your life
<<
<
5 of 5
>>
>
VIEW DESKTOP SITE TOP

JOIN US HERE

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Hearst Corporation

Hearst Corporation

DIGITAL SPY, PART OF THE HEARST UK ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK

© 2015 Hearst Magazines UK is the trading name of the National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Complaints
  • Site Map