And it wasn't a group decision..."dying of starvation"...oh Laura, you silly little ignorant girl.

It was literally like 8 hours of no "rich" food.

Sam was pissing me off too with his song. Eat a sugar cube - proper poor and hungry folk dont even have that!!!!

I actually CANNOT stand Ryan & Jackson. Jason is still top 3 for me - he and Andy were right.

yeah Andy hasn't done anything wrong in there has he (ROLLEYES), beside sh*t stir, bitching,moaning & how unhappy he always is and yet people on here want that miserable lump to win

He was also correct when he said that group only see and hear what they want .

Line of the series 'I can spell Pâté'

Like some of the anti Andy forum members on here.

Hes a bore.. he should concentrate on sorting out his own life before judging others.

Hes such a good judge of character isnt he..getting engaged to a guy who cheats with men on grindr.

I have a feeling you are talking about the house as a whole surely?
There have been much worse housemates when using those exact words youve used.

They throw them off rooftops

I wouldn't call it being a good judge of character, it's called trust. And it's hardly the person's lack of judgement if their partner turns out to be a cheat. Unless they are serial cheaters.

Surely you're not blaming Andy?

She's aged 30, which makes it worse. The housemates who took the food are the ones who were being miserable, but they twisted it all round to target Jason and Andy. Jason didn't moan, he just said it wasn't a "group decision."

Agreed.

Whats the point of BB making rules for this game if they never follow the rules...BB need to punish ONLY those who broke the rules...and make it harsh.

Even if his outside/personal life was a complete mess, he still has the right to judge the behavior of other housemates. They won't take responsibility for their own behavior.

I don`t....I think you are quite correct in your assessment of him. Yep, he is indeed a miserable lump..and some

They'd just direct their anger for the punishment towards Jason and Andy.

I like Andy more than not - I don't think he has a hell's chance of winning, but then I can't think of a 'winner' as such within that house.

I see it as whoever wins deserves to win because they made it to the final and got the most votes All I can hope for is that it's somebody I at least found interesting, even better if I liked them but not necessary. We all have different ideas on who should win, could win and why. But who deserves to win - the winner does

If, say, Jackson won I'd say he deserved it because, much as I don't always like him, I haven't always disliked him either and he's certainly played the game and been a prominent housemate.

**** him.....they were having some fun diving into the food

So did Andy say he would make it up to everyone when he agreed to have his bf stop another night.

Big Brother is about breaking rules sometimes and disagreeing with the big man. I loved it when Jayne joined in. Was a bit of rebellious fun

Oh well, im sure the guys can handle it.

That wasn't theirs.

HM's constantly break the rules, it's time BB got harsh over this kind of thing...BB should kick out the ring leader Laura to make an example of her...that'll stop random rule breaks.

WTF does any of that have to do with whether Andy was right in what he said, nor not?

He didn't though. Emma was the one who pressed the buzzer for the bfs to stay a second time.

It's more fun for us as viewers if they break the rules, so I prefer it if they do

The food was left around deliberately to tempt them, it worked. I can't imagine that I wouldn't have done the same.